Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business andStakeholder Codes
- 2.4k Downloads
Increasing attention to the issue of child labor has been reflected in codes of conduct that emerged in the past decade in particular. This paper examines the way in which multinationals, business associations, governmental and non-governmental organizations deal with child labor in their codes. With a standardized framework, it analyzes 55 codes drawn up by these different actors to influence firms’ external, societal behavior. The exploratory study helps to identify the main issues related to child labor and the use of voluntary instruments such as codes of conduct. Apart from a specific indication of the topics covered by the code, especially minimum-age requirements, this also includes monitoring systems and monitoring parties. Most important to company codes are the sanctions imposed on business partners in case of non-compliance. Severe measures may be counterproductive as they do not change the underlying causes of child labor and can worsen the situation of the child workers by driving them to more hazardous work in the informal sector. This underlines the importance of a broad rather than a restrictive approach to child labor in codes of conduct. The paper discusses the implications of this study, offering suggestions for future research.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Basu, K.: 1999b, ‘International Labor Standards and Child Labor’, Challenge (September-October), 80-93.Google Scholar
- Bowie, N. and P. Vaaler: 1999, ‘Some Arguments for Universal Moral Standards’, in G. Enderle (ed.), International Business Ethics. Challenges and Approaches (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN), pp. 160-173.Google Scholar
- Cleek, M. A. and S. L. Leonard: 1998, ‘Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behavior?’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 619-630.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T.: 1997, ‘Fundamental Rights and Multinational Duties’, in N. E. Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, Fifth Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 535-545.Google Scholar
- Fyfe, A. and M. Jankanish: 1997, Trade Unions and Child Labour (ILO, Geneva).Google Scholar
- George, I.: 1990, Child Labour and Child Work (Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi).Google Scholar
- Hartman, L. P., B. Shaw and R. Stevenson: 1999, ‘Balancing Sweatshop Ethics and Economics’ Labor Standards Working Paper No. 9901 <http://www.ssrn.com>.Google Scholar
- ILO: 1998, ‘Statistics on Working Children and Hazardous Child Labour in Brief’, Bureau of Statistics, Geneva.Google Scholar
- Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and C. Welters: 1999, ‘International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can Transnational Corporations Regulate Themselves?’, Transnational Corporations 8(1), 143-180.Google Scholar
- Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and I. Sloekers: 2001, ‘Werken gedragscodes kinderarbeid?’, ESB 86(4295), 160-163.Google Scholar
- Save the Children: 2000, Big Business, Small Hands-Responsible Approaches to Child Labour (The Wolsey Press, London).Google Scholar
- UNICEF: The State of the World’s Children (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar