Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 291–301 | Cite as

Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business andStakeholder Codes

  • Ans Kolk
  • Rob van Tulder
Article

Abstract

Increasing attention to the issue of child labor has been reflected in codes of conduct that emerged in the past decade in particular. This paper examines the way in which multinationals, business associations, governmental and non-governmental organizations deal with child labor in their codes. With a standardized framework, it analyzes 55 codes drawn up by these different actors to influence firms’ external, societal behavior. The exploratory study helps to identify the main issues related to child labor and the use of voluntary instruments such as codes of conduct. Apart from a specific indication of the topics covered by the code, especially minimum-age requirements, this also includes monitoring systems and monitoring parties. Most important to company codes are the sanctions imposed on business partners in case of non-compliance. Severe measures may be counterproductive as they do not change the underlying causes of child labor and can worsen the situation of the child workers by driving them to more hazardous work in the informal sector. This underlines the importance of a broad rather than a restrictive approach to child labor in codes of conduct. The paper discusses the implications of this study, offering suggestions for future research.

business associations child labor codes of conduct international organizations multi-national enterprises non-governmental organizations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basu, K.: 1999a, ‘Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards’, Journal of Economic Literature XXXVII, 1083-1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, K.: 1999b, ‘International Labor Standards and Child Labor’, Challenge (September-October), 80-93.Google Scholar
  3. Bowie, N. and P. Vaaler: 1999, ‘Some Arguments for Universal Moral Standards’, in G. Enderle (ed.), International Business Ethics. Challenges and Approaches (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN), pp. 160-173.Google Scholar
  4. Buller, P. F., J. J. Kohls and K. S. Andersen: 1997, ‘A Model for Addressing Cross-cultural Ethical Conflicts’, Business and Society 26(2), 169-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleek, M. A. and S. L. Leonard: 1998, ‘Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behavior?’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 619-630.Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson, T.: 1997, ‘Fundamental Rights and Multinational Duties’, in N. E. Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, Fifth Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 535-545.Google Scholar
  7. Fyfe, A. and M. Jankanish: 1997, Trade Unions and Child Labour (ILO, Geneva).Google Scholar
  8. George, I.: 1990, Child Labour and Child Work (Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi).Google Scholar
  9. Hartman, L. P., B. Shaw and R. Stevenson: 1999, ‘Balancing Sweatshop Ethics and Economics’ Labor Standards Working Paper No. 9901 <http://www.ssrn.com>.Google Scholar
  10. Hindman, H. D. and C. G. Smith: 1999, ‘Crosscultural Ethics and the Child Labor Problem’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 21-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, K. T.: 1997, ‘Globalizing Corporate Ethics Programs: Perils and Prospects’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1227-1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ILO: 1998, ‘Statistics on Working Children and Hazardous Child Labour in Brief’, Bureau of Statistics, Geneva.Google Scholar
  13. Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and C. Welters: 1999, ‘International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can Transnational Corporations Regulate Themselves?’, Transnational Corporations 8(1), 143-180.Google Scholar
  14. Kolk, A., R. van Tulder and I. Sloekers: 2001, ‘Werken gedragscodes kinderarbeid?’, ESB 86(4295), 160-163.Google Scholar
  15. Langlois, C. C. and B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‘Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States’, Journal of International Business Studies 21(4), 519-539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prakash, A.: 2000, ‘Responsible Care: An Assessment’, Business and Society 39(2), 183-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Save the Children: 2000, Big Business, Small Hands-Responsible Approaches to Child Labour (The Wolsey Press, London).Google Scholar
  18. Somers, M. J.: 2001, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship Between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 185-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tulder, R. van and A. Kolk: 2001, ‘Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(2), 267-283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UNICEF: The State of the World’s Children (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Weaver, G. R.: 2001, ‘Ethics Programs in Global Businesses: Culture’s Role in Managing Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 3-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ans Kolk
    • 1
  • Rob van Tulder
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics, Department of Accountancy & Information ManagementUniversity of AmsterdamAmstelveenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations