Advertisement

Journal of Management and Governance

, Volume 5, Issue 3–4, pp 353–379 | Cite as

The Process of Vertical Dis-Integration: An Evolutionary Perspective on Outsourcing

  • Volker Mahnke
Article

Abstract

It is argued that an evolutionaryperspective on firm boundaries with its strongfocus on knowledge, as well as processes ofsearch, learning and capability development isinstrumental in developing a theory of firmboundaries that is close to managerialconcerns. Building on insights in evolutionaryeconomics, propositions are developed regardingscope, speed, and switching costs in theprocess of vertical dis-integration of whichoutsourcing is a particular instance. Currenttheories of firm boundaries give indication whycertain activities might be candidates foroutsourcing by stressing efficiency gains interms of transaction and production costs. They overlook, however, that ``technologicallyseparable interface'' between activities might notbe available in codified form, and neglectlearning dynamics that lead to strategicconsequences in terms of capability developmentand adaptability in competitive environments ofvarying dynamics. An evolutionary perspectiveon vertical dis-integration recognises thatfirms make contractual commitments and partlytacit capabilities develop in a path-dependentmanner. The fact that the firm's past casts ashadow on current governance options, andpossibilities to realise them, complicates theprocess of governance change and imposesswitching costs that impact the scope and speedof vertical dis-integration. An evolutionaryperspective on vertical dis-integration alsosuggests considering long-term consequences ofoutsourcing decisions on the dynamiccapabilities of the firm.

Keywords

Production Cost Industrial Organization Switching Cost Evolutionary Perspective Competitive Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A.: 1970, “The Market for Lemons: Quality and the Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review 625: 772–795.Google Scholar
  3. Argyres, N. and J. Liebeskind: 2000, “The Role of Prior Commitment in Governance Choice”, in N. Foss and V. Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Argyres, N. and J. Liebeskind: 1999, “Contractual Commitments, Bargaining Power, and Governance Inseparability: Incorporating History into Transaction Cost Theory”, Academy of Management Review: 49–63.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K.: 1974, The Limits of Organization (New York: W.W. Norton and Co.).Google Scholar
  6. Aubert, B., S. Rivard and M. Patry: 1996, “A Transaction Cost Approach to Outsourcing Behavior”, Information Management 30: 51–64.Google Scholar
  7. Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  8. Barney, J: 1991, “Firm resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
  9. Baron, J.N. and D.M. Kreps: 1999, “Consistent Human Resource Practice”, California Business Review 41(3): 30–52.Google Scholar
  10. Barhelemy, J.: 2001, “The Hidden Costs of IT Outsourcing”, Sloan Management Review: 60–69.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, B. and B. Gerhart: 1996, “The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects”, Academy of Management Journal 39: 779–801.Google Scholar
  12. Bettis, R.A. and M.A. Hitt: 1995, “The New Competitive Landscape”, Strategic Management Journal 16: 7–20.Google Scholar
  13. Chandler, A.D.: 1992, “Organizational Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 79–100.Google Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, H. and D. Teece: 1996, “When Is Virtual Virtuous”, Harvard Business Review: 65–74.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, K.B. and S. Wheelwright: 1993, Managing New Product and Process Development (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  16. Coase, R.H.: 1988, “The Nature of the Firm: Origin, Meaning, Influence”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 41: 3–47.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, M. and P. Bacadayan: 1994, “Organizational Routines are Stored in Organizational Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study”, Organization Science 5: 554–568.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal: 1989, “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D”, Economic Journal 99: 569–627.Google Scholar
  19. Conner, K.R. and C.K. Prahalad: 1996, “A Resource Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism”, Organization Science 7(5): 477–501.Google Scholar
  20. Coombs, R. and S. Metcalfe: 2000, “Organizing for Innovation: Coordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities”, in M. Foss and V. Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Coriat, B. and G. Dosi: 1998, “Learning How to Govern and Learning How to Solve Problems”, in Chandler et al. (eds.), The Dynamic Firm (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Cowen, R. and D. Foray: 1997, “The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge”, Industrial and Corporate Change 6(3): 595–622.Google Scholar
  23. Cyert, R. and J.G. March: 1963, A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  24. D'Aveni, R.A.: 1994, Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  25. Day, J. and J. Wendler: 1999, “The New Economics of Organization”, McKinsey Quarterly 1: 4–17.Google Scholar
  26. Demsetz, H.: 1991/1988, “The Theory of the Firm Revisited”, in O.E. Williamson and S. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 159–178.Google Scholar
  27. Dierickx, I. and K. Cool: 1989, “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Management Science 35: 1504–1511.Google Scholar
  28. Domberger, S.: 1998, The Contracting Organization (OUP).Google Scholar
  29. Dosi, G. and L. Marengo: 1994, “Toward a Theory of Organizational Competencies”, in R.W. England (ed.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press), pp. 157–178.Google Scholar
  30. Dosi, G. and L. Marengo.: 1994, “Some Elements of an Evolutionary Theory of Organizational Competences”, in R.W. Englander (eds.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  31. Dosi, G. and L. Marengo: 2000, “On the Tangled Discourse Between Transaction Cost Economics and Competence Based Views of the Firm”, in N. Foss and V. Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Dosi, G. and M. Egidi: 1991, “Substantive and Procedural Uncertainty. An Exploration of Economic Behaviours in Complex and Changing Environments”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 145–168.Google Scholar
  33. Dyer, G. and Nobeoka: 2000, “Creating Knowledge and Managing a High Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case”, Strategic Management Journal 21: 345–467.Google Scholar
  34. Earl, M.: 1996, “The Risks of IT Outsourcing”, Sloan Management Review 37: 26–34.Google Scholar
  35. Foss, N.: 1999, “Research in the Strategic Theory of the Firm; Isolationism vs. Integrationism”, Journal of Management Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Foss, N.J.: 1993, “Theories of the Firm: Competence and Contractual Perspectives”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3: 127–144.Google Scholar
  37. Foss., N.J.: 1997, “The Classical Theory of Production and the Capabilities View of the Firm”, Journal of Economic Studies 24: 307–323.Google Scholar
  38. Gartner Group: 2000, Outsourcing Trends 2000-2005.Google Scholar
  39. Goldhaber, G.M.: 1993, Organizational Communication (Madision, WI: Brown & Benchmark).Google Scholar
  40. Grandori, A.: 2001, Organization and Economic Behaviour (Routledge).Google Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M.: 1985, “Economic action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.Google Scholar
  42. Grant, R.: 1996, “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal 17: 109–122.Google Scholar
  43. Grossman, S. and O. Hart: 1986, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical Integration”, Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.Google Scholar
  44. Hamel, G.: 1991, “Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal 12: 83–103.Google Scholar
  45. Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad: 1994, Competing for the Future (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
  46. Harre, R. and N. deCarlo: 1985, Motives and Mechanisms (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
  47. Hart, O.: 1995, Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  48. Haspeslagh P.C. and D.B. Jemison: 1991, Managing Acquisition: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  49. Holmstrom, B.R. and J. Tirole: 1989, “The theory of the firm”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 1 (Amsterdam: North Holland), pp. 61–133.Google Scholar
  50. Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom: 1994, “The Firm as an Incentive System”, American Economic Review 84: 972–991.Google Scholar
  51. Holmström, B. and J. Roberts: 1998, “The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited”, Journal of Economic Perspectives.Google Scholar
  52. Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom 1991, “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24–52.Google Scholar
  53. Ichniowski, C.T.A., D. Kochan, C. Levine, G. Olson, and G. Strauss: 1996, “What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment”, Industrial Relations 353: 299–333.Google Scholar
  54. Jemison, D.B. and S.B. Sitkin: 1986, “Corporate Acquisition: A Process Perspective”, Academy of Manangement Review 11: 145–163.Google Scholar
  55. Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling: 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.Google Scholar
  56. Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz: 1982, Market Structure and Innovation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  57. Klein, B., R.G. Crawford and A. Alchian: 1978, “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process”, Journal of Law and Economics: 297–326.Google Scholar
  58. Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1996, “What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning”, Organization Science 7: 502–518.Google Scholar
  59. Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1992, “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science 3: 383–397.Google Scholar
  60. Kreps, D.: 1990, “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory”, in J. Alt and K. Shepsle (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 90–143.Google Scholar
  61. Langlois, R.N. and P. Robertson: 1995, Firms, Markets, and Economic Change (Routledge).Google Scholar
  62. Langlois, R.N. and N.J. Foss: 1999, “Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of the Firm”, forthcoming in KYKLOS.Google Scholar
  63. Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W.: 1967, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Boston: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  64. Levinthal, D.A. and J.G. March: 1993, “The Myopia of Learning”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 95–113.Google Scholar
  65. Levitt, B. and J. March: 1988, “Organizational Learning”, American Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.Google Scholar
  66. Liebeskind, J.: 1997, “Keeping Organizational Secret: Protective Institutional Mechanisms and Their Costs”, Industrial and Corporate Change 6(3): 623–663.Google Scholar
  67. Lippman, S.A. and R.P. Rumelt: 1982, “Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Competition”, Bell Journal of Economics 13: 418–438.Google Scholar
  68. Loasby, B.: 2001, “The Evolution of Knowledge”, DRUID Working Paper.Google Scholar
  69. Loasby, B.J.: 1976, Choice, Complexity, and Ignorance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  70. Lyles, M. and J. Stalk: 1996, “Knowledge Acquisition from Foreign Parents in International Joint Ventures”, Journal of International Business Studies 27(5): 877–904.Google Scholar
  71. MacKenzie, D. and G. Spinardi: 1995, “Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons”, American Journal of Sociology 101: 44–99.Google Scholar
  72. Mahnke, V.: 1998, Economies of Knowledge-Sharing, Copenhagen Business School Working Paper.Google Scholar
  73. Mahoney, J.T.: 1992, “Organizational Economics within the Conversation of Strategic Management”, in Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 8, (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.), pp. 103–155.Google Scholar
  74. Malerba, F. and L. Orsiengo: 1994, “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 47–86.Google Scholar
  75. March, J.: 1994, A Primer in Decision Making (Free Press).Google Scholar
  76. March, J. G.: 1991, “Exploration and Exploitation in Oganizational Learning”, Organization Science 2: 71–87.Google Scholar
  77. March, J.G. and H.A. Simon 1958/1991, Organizations (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar
  78. Marengo, L.: 1999, “Decentralisation and Market Mechanisms in Collective Problem-Solving”, mimeo.Google Scholar
  79. Matusik, S. and C. Hill: 1998, “The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage”, The Academy of Management Review 23(4): 680–697.Google Scholar
  80. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J.: 1995, “Complementarities and Fit Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 179–208.Google Scholar
  81. Milgrom, P.R. and J. Roberts: 1992, Economics, Organization, and Management (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  82. Nelson, R.: 1991, “Why Do Firms Differ and How Does It Matter?”, Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.Google Scholar
  83. Nelson, R. and S. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press).Google Scholar
  84. Nellore, R. and K. Søderquist: 2000, “Strategic Outsourcing Through Specications”, Omega (3): 525–540.Google Scholar
  85. Nonaka, I.: 1994, “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science 5: 14–37.Google Scholar
  86. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  87. Pavitt, K.: 1999, Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  88. Penrose, E.: 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  89. Peteraf, M.A.: 1993, “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 179–191.Google Scholar
  90. Pfeffer, J.: 1982, Organizations and Organization Theory (Boston: Pittman).Google Scholar
  91. Pfeffer, J.: 1992, Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
  92. Pfeffer, J. and N. Langton: 1993, “The Effect of Wage Dispersion on Satisfaction, Productivity, and Working Collaboratively: Evidence from College and University Faculty”, Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 382–407.Google Scholar
  93. Polanyi, M.: 1966, The Tacit Dimension (New York, NY: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  94. Poppo L. and T. Zenger: 1998, “Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions in Information Services”, Strategic Management Journal 19(9): 853–877.Google Scholar
  95. Porter, M.E.: 1996, “What is Strategy”, Harvard Business Review (November-December) 746: 61–80.Google Scholar
  96. PWC: 1998, The Outsourcing Challenge (PriceWaterhouseCooper Publication).Google Scholar
  97. Quinn, B. and F. Hilmer: 1995, “Strategic Outsourcing”, McKinsey Quarterly (1): 48–70.Google Scholar
  98. Rebitzer, J and L. Taylor: 1995, “EfficiencyWages and Employment Rents: The Employer-Size Wage Effect in the Job Market for Lawyers”, Journal of Labor Economics (October) 13(4): 678–708.Google Scholar
  99. Rumelt, R.P.: 1984, “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm”, in R.B. Lamb (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management (Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), pp. 556–570.Google Scholar
  100. Rumelt, R.P.: 1995, “Inertia and Transformation”, in C.A. Montgomery (ed.), Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 101–132.Google Scholar
  101. Schumpeter, J.A.: 1950, Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
  102. Selznick, P.: 1957, Leadership in Administration (Berkeley: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  103. Simon, H.: 1969, The science of the Artificial (MIT Press).Google Scholar
  104. Simon, H.: 1991, “Organizations and Markets”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 25–44.Google Scholar
  105. Smith, A.: 1776, The Wealth of Nation (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  106. Stein. J and J. Ridderståle: 1996, “Managing the Dissemination of Competences”, Working Paper. The Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  107. Stigler, G.: 1951, “The Division of Labour is Limited by the Extent of the Market”, Journal of Political Ecomomy 59: 185–193.Google Scholar
  108. Teece, D.J.: 1992, “Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation - Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological-Progress”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  109. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen: 1998, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533.Google Scholar
  110. Teece, D.J., R.P. Rumelt, G. Dosi and S.G. Winter: 1994, “Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23: 1–30.Google Scholar
  111. Tushman, M.L. and P. Anderson: 1986, “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly 31(3): 439–465.Google Scholar
  112. von Hippel, E.: 1988, The Sources of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University).Google Scholar
  113. Walker, G. and L. Poppo: 1991, “Profit Centers, SingleSource Suppliers, and Transaction Costs”, Administrative Science Quarterly (March) 36: 66–87.Google Scholar
  114. Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, “A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 4–12.Google Scholar
  115. Williamson, O.: 1985, The economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  116. Williamson, O.: 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  117. Williamson, O.: 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  118. Williamson, O.: 1991, “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269–296.Google Scholar
  119. Winter, S.: 2000, “The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning”, Strategic Management Journal: 981–996.Google Scholar
  120. Winter, S.: 1987, “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets”, in D. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger), pp. 159–184.Google Scholar
  121. Winter, S. G.: 1988, “On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4: 163–180.Google Scholar
  122. Winter, S.G.: 1982, “An Essay on the Theory of Production”, in H. Hymans (ed.), Economics and the World around It (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 55–93.Google Scholar
  123. Young, A.: 1928, “Increasing returns and Economic Progress”, Economic Journal 38: 523–542.Google Scholar
  124. Zenger, T.: 1994, “Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale in R&D: The Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Firm Size”, Management Science 40(6): 708–729.Google Scholar
  125. Zenger, T.R.: 1992, “Why Do Employers only Reward Extreme Performance? Examining the Relationships among Performance Pay and Turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 198–219.Google Scholar
  126. Zenger, T.R. and W.S. Hesterly: 1997, “The Disaggregation of Corporations: Selective Intervention, High-Powered Incentives, and Molecular Units”, Organization Science 8(3): 209–222.Google Scholar
  127. Zollo, M. and S. Winter: 2001, “From Organizational Routines to Dynamic Capabilities”, Wharton Working PaperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Mahnke
    • 1
  1. 1.LINK, Department of Industrial Economics and StrategyCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations