Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 130, Issue 1–4, pp 1139–1144 | Cite as

Characterization of Critical Load Exceedances in Europe

  • M. Posch
  • J.-P. Hettelingh
  • P.A.M. De Smet
Article

Abstract

The excess of acidic and eutrophying depositions over critical loads (critical load exceedances) is considered a measure for the risk of harmful effects on sensitive elements of the environment. The magnitude and the geographical distribution of critical load exceedances over Europe vary with the extent to which national emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and ammonia are reduced. The scientific support of negotiations on emission reductions in the framework of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) of the UN Economic Commission for Europe has been based on the integrated assessment of sources, including abatement costs, and risks to receptors (e.g. forests, lakes) using critical load exceedances. The shift from a single-pollutant (sulfur) protocol in 1994 to a multi-pollutant protocol in 1999 necessitated an extension of the methods by which critical load exceedances are computed and mapped. The focus changed from the protection of the most sensitive ecosystem against excessive deposition of one pollutant, to an assessment of the accumulated exceedance by more pollutants of all ecosystems. This paper presents and compares the different characterisations ("gap-closure methods") used in those negotiations. It is shown that the approach finally used has several appealing features, but treats the exceedance as a linear damage function, thus going beyond the critical load definition as a simple on-off limit value.

critical loads acidification eutrophication LRTAP Convention integrated assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hettelingh, J.-P., Posch, M., de Smet, P.A.M. and Downing, R.J.: 1995, Water Air Soil Pollut. 85: 2381–2389.Google Scholar
  2. Hettelingh, J.-P., Posch, M. and de Smet, P.A.M.: 2001, Multi-effect critical loads used in multi-pollutant reduction agreements in Europe. Water Air Soil Pollut. (this volume).Google Scholar
  3. Nilsson, J. and Grennfelt, P. (eds): 1988, Critical Loads for Sulphur and Nitrogen. Nord 1988:97, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, 418 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Posch M., de Smet, P.A.M., Hettelingh, J.-P. and Downing, R.J. (eds): 1999, Calculation and Mapping of Critical Thresholds in Europe. CCE Status Report 1999, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 165 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Schöpp, W., Amann, M., Cofala, J., Heyes, C. and Klimont, Z.: 1999, Environmental Modelling & Software, 14(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. UN/ECE: 1996, Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Mapping Critical Levels/Loads. Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Texte 71/96, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Posch
    • 1
  • J.-P. Hettelingh
  • P.A.M. De Smet
  1. 1.Coordination Center for Effects (CCE) National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)BilthovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations