Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening – a population-based register study (Sweden) Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Lagerlund, M., Maxwell, A.E., Bastani, R. et al. Cancer Causes Control (2002) 13: 73. doi:10.1023/A:1013978421073 Abstract Objective: To investigate the role of sociodemographic factors in predicting mammography uptake in an outreach screening program. Methods: Linkage of data from a regional population-based mammography program with four Swedish nationwide registers: the Population and Housing Census of 1990, the Fertility Register, the Cancer Register, and the Cause of Death Register. We computed odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for non-attendance by sociodemographic factors. Non-attendance was defined as failure to attend in response to the two most recent invitations. Results: Multivariate analyses among 4198 non-attenders and 38,972 attenders revealed that both childless and high-parity women were more likely to be non-attenders (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6–2.0 and OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.8–2.7, respectively). Women living without a partner were less likely to attend (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5–1.9), as were non-employed women (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.9–2.3). Those renting an apartment were more likely to be non-attenders compared with home-owners (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6–2.0), and immigrants from non-Nordic countries were more than twice as likely to be non-attenders compared with Swedish-born women (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 2.0–2.8). Conclusions: There are identifiable subgroups in which mammography utilization can be increased. Special attention should be paid to women who have never attended, childless women, and non-Nordic immigrants. breast cancer demography mammography mass screening utilization References
European Commission (1996) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening, 2nd edn. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Olsson S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. (1995) 600, 000 kvinnor per aår underso¨ ks med mammografi. Var femte inbjuden avstaår fraå n screening. [600 000 women are examined by mammography per year. Every fifth of them refuses screening.]. Lakartidningen 92: 552-556.
Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS (1999) Trends in selfreported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ 48: 1-22.
Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP (2000) Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist. Am J Public Health 90: 799-803.
Smith RA, Haynes S (1992) Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer 69: 1968-1978.
Bostick RM, Sprafka JM, Virnig BA, Potter JD (1994) Predictors of cancer prevention attitudes and participation in cancer screening examinations. Prev Med 23: 816-826. Mammography screening in Sweden 81
Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM (1993) Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 83: 53-60.
Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath Jr CW (1996) Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med 12: 82-90.
Lagerlund M, Hedin A, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, Lambe M (2000) Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Prev Med 31: 417-428.
.Lagerlund M, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M (2000) Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening program; sociodemographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 9: 25-33.
Lagerlund M, Widmark C, Lambe M, Tishelman C (2001) Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening-a focus group study among women in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 10: 429-442.
Johansson L, Finna¨ s F (1983) Fertility of Swedish Women Born 1927-1960. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
National Board of Health and Welfare. Center for Epidemiology (1998) Cancer Incidence in Sweden 1958-1995. Stockholm.
SAS Users Guide: Statistics (1993) Gary, NC: SAS Institute.
Hobbs P, Smith A, George WD, Sellwood RA (1980) Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves. J Epidemiol Commun Health 34: 19-22.
Kee F, Telford AM, Donaghy P, O'Doherty A (1992) Attitude or access: reasons for not attending mammography in Northern Ireland. Eur J Cancer Prev 1: 311-315.
Schofield PE, Cockburn J, Hill DJ, Reading D (1994) Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography program: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen 1: 144-149.
Scaf-Klomp W, van Sonderen FL, Stewart R, van Dijck JA, van den Heuvel WJ (1995) Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 2: 195-199.
Calnan M (1984) The health belief model and participation in programs for the early detection of breast cancer: a comparative analysis. Soc Sci Med 19: 823-830.
Maclean U, Sinfield D, Klein S, Harnden B (1984) Women who decline breast screening. J Epidemiol Commun Health 38: 278-283.
McNoe B, Richardson AK, Elwood JM (1996) Factors affecting participation in mammography screening. NZ Med J 109: 359-361.
Seow A, Straughan PT, Ng EH, Emmanuel SC, Tan CH, Lee HP (1997) Factors determining acceptability of mammography in an Asian population: a study among women in Singapore. Cancer Causes Control 8: 771-779.
Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G (1994) Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. J Epidemiol Commun Health 48: 65-73.
French K, Porter AM, Robinson SE, McCallum FM, Howie JG, Roberts MM (1982) Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 285: 617-620.
Ore L, Hagoel L, Shifroni G, Rennert G (1997) Compliance with mammography screening in Israeli women: the impact of a prescheduled appointment and of the letter-style. Isr J Med Sci 33: 103-111.
Luengo S, Lazaro P, Azcona B, Madero R, Fitch K (1999) Use of mammography among women residing in Spanish provinces with breast cancer screening programs. Eur J Cancer Prev 8: 517-524.
Hagoel L, Ore L, Neter E, Shifroni G, Rennert G (1999) The gradient in mammography screening behavior: a lifestyle marker. Soc Sci Med 48: 1281-1290.
Donato F, Bollani A, Spiazzi R, et al. (1991) Factors associated with non-participation of women in a breast cancer screening program in a town in northern Italy. J Epidemiol Commun Health 45: 59-64.
Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M (1999) Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6: 82-88.
Gram IT, Slenker SE (1992) Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited. Am J Public Health 82: 249-251.
Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US (1998) Mammography utilization and related attitudes among Korean-American women. Women Health 27: 89-107.
Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US (2000) Demographic predictors of cancer screening among Filipino and Korean immigrants in the United States. Am J Prev Med 18: 62-68.
Peragallo NP, Fox PG, Alba ML (1998) Breast care among Latino immigrant women in the U.S. Health Care Women Int 19: 165-172.
Remennick LI (1999) Breast screening practices among Russian immigrant women in Israel. Women Health 28: 29-51.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002