Synthese

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 69–90 | Cite as

Holism, Underdetermination, And The Dynamics Of Empirical Theories

  • Ulrich Gähde

Abstract

The goal of this article is to show that the structuralist approachprovides a powerful framework for the analysis of certain holistic phenomena in empirical theories.We focus on two aspects of holism. The first refers to the involvement of comprehensive complexes of hypothesesin the theoretical treatment of systems regarded in isolation. By contrast, the second refers to thecorrelation between the theoretical descriptions of different systems. It is demonstrated how these two aspectscan be analysed by making use of the structuralist notion of theory-nets, and how they are reflected by a refinedversion of the Ramsey sentence. Furthermore, it is argued that there exists a tight correlation between theoccurrence of these two holistic phenomena, a specific form of underdetermination of terms which occur in thefundamental principles of an empirical theory, and the shaping of the theory's protective belt. After having dealtwith these questions in abstracto, the relevance of these considerations for a better understanding of the dynamicsof empirical theories is demonstrated in a concrete case study. It refers to the role holistic phenomenaplayed in the investigation of the anomalous advance of Mercury's perihelion and in the various attempts to eliminate this anomaly.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Balzer, W., C. U. Moulines, and J. D. Sneed: 1987, An Architectonic for Science,Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Duhem, P.: 1906, La théorie physique, son objet et sa structure, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Gähde, U.: 1990, 'On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms', Erkenntnis 32, 215–233.Google Scholar
  4. Gähde, U.: 1996: 'Holism and the Empirical Claimof Theory-Nets', in W. Balzer and C. U. Moulines (eds), Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results, de Gruyter, Berlin - New York, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
  5. Gähde, U.: 1997, 'Anomalies and the Revision of Theory-Elements: Notes on the Advance of Mercury's Perihelion', in M. L. Dalla Chiara et al. (eds), Structures and Norms in Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
  6. Roseveare, N. T.: 1982, Mercury's Perihelion. From Le Verrier to Einstein, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Gähde
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations