# Supporting Students' Ability to Reason about Data

- 382 Downloads
- 24 Citations

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the role of an instructional sequence and two accompanying computer-based tools in supporting students' developing understandings of statistical data analysis. In doing so, we also take account of the role of the data creation process in supporting students' ability to engage in *genuine* data analysis. Data is taken from two classroom teaching experiments conducted with middle-grades students (ages twelve and thirteen) in the fall semester of 1998 and 1999. Through analysis of two classroom episodes we document 1) the emergence of the sociomathematical norm of what counts as a mathematical argument in the context of data analysis, and 2) the importance of the data creation process in grounding the students' activity in the context of a problem or question under investigation. These claims are grounded in students' ways of reasoning about data as they made arguments in the course of their analyses.

## Keywords

Data Analysis Statistical Data Teaching Experiment Classroom Teaching Creation Process## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G. and Voigt, J.: 1988, ‘Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies’, in H.G. Steiner and A. Vermandel (eds.),
*Foundations and Methodology of the Discipline of Mathematics Education*, Antwerp, Belgium: Proceedings of the Theory of Mathematics Education Conference, pp. 174–188.Google Scholar - Biehler, R.: 1993, ‘Software tools and mathematics education: The case of statistics’, in C. Keitel and K. Ruthven (eds.),
*Learning from Computers: Mathematics Education and Technology*Springer, Berlin, pp. 68–100.Google Scholar - Biehler, R.: 1994, ‘Cognitive technologies for statistics education: Relating the perspective of tools for learning and of tools for doing statistics’, in L. Brunelli and G. Cicchitelli (eds.),
*Proceedings of the First Scientific Meeting of the International Association for Statistical Education*, Universita de Perugia, Perugia, pp. 173–190.Google Scholar - Biehler, R., Rach, W. and Winkelmann, B.: 1988,
*Computers and Mathematics Teaching: The German Situation and Reviews of International Software*, Occasional paper #103. Institute fur Didaktik der Mathematik. University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, FRG.Google Scholar - Biehler, R. and Steinbring, H.: 1991, ‘Explorations in statistics, stem-and-leaf, boxplots: Concepts, justifications and experience in a teaching experiment’,
*Der Mathematikunterricht*37(6), 5–32.Google Scholar - Burrill, G.: 1996, ‘Data analysis in the United States: Curriculum projects’, in B. Phillips (ed.),
*Papers on Statistical Education*, Swinburne Press, Hawthorn, Australia.Google Scholar - Burrill, G. and Romberg, T.A. (in press), ‘Statistics and probability for the middle grades: Examples from mathematics in context’, in S.P. Lajoie (ed.),
*Reflections on Statistics: Agendas for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment in K-12*, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Cai, J. and Moyer, J.C.: 1995,
*Middle School Students' Understanding of Average: A Problem-Solving Approach*, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar - Cobb, G.W.: 1997, ‘Mere literacy is not enough’, in L.A. Steen (ed.),
*Why Numbers Count: Quantitative Literacy for Tomorrow's America*, College Examination Board, New York.Google Scholar - Cobb, P.: 1999,‘Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis’,
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning*, 5–44.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M. and Underwood, D.: 1994, ‘Construction individuelle, acculturation mathématique et communauté scolaire’,
*Revue des Sciences de l'Éducation*20, 41–62.Google Scholar - Cobb, P. and Yackel, E.: 1996, ‘Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research’,
*Educational Psychologist*31, 175–190.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., McClain, K. and Gravemeijer, K.: (in press), ‘Learning about statistical covariation’,
*Cognition and Instruction*.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. and Gravemeijer, K.: 2001, ‘Participating in classroom mathematical practices’,
*Journal for the Learning Sciences*10(1,2), 113–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P. and Whitenack, J.W.: 1996, ‘A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom videorecordings and transcripts’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*30, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - deLange, J., van Reeuwijk, M., Burrill, G. and Romberg, T.: 1993,
*Learning and Testing Mathematics in Context*.*The Case: Data Visualization*, University of Wisconsin, National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education, Madison, WI.Google Scholar - Doerr, H.M.: 1995, April,
*An Integrated Approach to Mathematical Modeling: A Classroom Study*, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar - Dörfler, W.: 1993, ‘Computer use and views of the mind’, in C. Keitel and K. Ruthven (eds.),
*Learning from Computers: Mathematics Education and Technology*, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 159–186.Google Scholar - Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.: 1967,
*The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research*, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J. and Whitenack, J.: 2000, ‘Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design,’ in P. Cobb, E. Yackel and K. McClain (eds.),
*Symbolizing and Communicating in Mathematics Classrooms: Perspectives on Discourse, Tools, and Instructional Design*, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar - Hancock, C.: in press, ‘The medium and the curriculum: Reflection on transparent tools and tacit mathematics’, in A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss and L. Edwards (eds.),
*Computers and Exploratory Learning*, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar - Harel, G. and Confrey, J.: 1994,
*The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics*, SUNY Press, New York.Google Scholar - Hershkowitz, R. and Schwartz, B.: 1999, ‘The emergent perspective in rich learning environments: Some roles of tools and activities in the construction of sociomathematical norms’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*39, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kaput, J.J.: 1994, ‘The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience’, in R. Biehler, R.W. Scholz, R. Strasser and B. Winkelmann (eds.),
*Didactics ofMathematics as a Scientific Discipline*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 379–397.Google Scholar - Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A. and Gagnon, A.: in press, ‘Students analyzing data: Research of critical barriers,’
*Journal of Research in Mathematics Education*.Google Scholar - Lampert, M.: 1990, ‘When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching’,
*American Educational Research Journal*27(1), 29–63.Google Scholar - Lajoie, S.P.: in press, ‘Reflections on a statistics agenda for K-12’, in S.P. Lajoie (ed.),
*Reflections on Statistics: Agendas for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment in K-12*, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Lajoie, S.P. and Romberg, T.A.: in press, ‘Identifying an agenda for statistics instruction and assessment in K-12’, in S.P. Lajoie (ed.),
*Reflections on Statistics: Agendas for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment in K-12*, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Lehrer, R. and Romberg, T.: 1996, ‘Exploring children's data modeling’,
*Cognition and Instruction*14, 69–108.Google Scholar - Lipson, K. and Jones, P.: 1996, ‘Statistics: Towards the 21st century’, in Phillips, B. (ed.),
*Papers on Statistical Education*, Swinburne Press, Hawthorn, Australia.Google Scholar - McClain, K., Cobb, P. and Gravemeijer, K.: 2000, ‘Supporting students' ways of reasoning about data’, in Burke, M. (ed.),
*Learning mathematics for a new century*, (2001 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), NCTM, Reston, VA.Google Scholar - McGatha, M., Cobb, P. and McClain K.: 1999, April,
*An Analysis of Student's Initial Statistical Understandings*, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar - Meira, L.: 1998, ‘Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*29, 121–142.Google Scholar - Mokros, J. and Russell, S.: 1995, ‘Childrens' concepts of average and representativeness’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*26(1), 20–39.Google Scholar - Moore, David S.: 1996, ‘New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics’, in Phillips, B. (ed.),
*Papers on Statistical Education*Swinburne Press, Hawthorn, Australia.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 2000,
*Standards 2000*, NCTM, Reston, VA.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers ofMathematics [NCTM].: 1989,
*Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics*, NCTM, Reston, VA.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM].: 1991,
*Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics*, NCTM, Reston, VA.Google Scholar - Pea, R.D.: 1993, ‘Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education’, in G. Solomon (ed.),
*Distributed Cognitions*, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 47–87.Google Scholar - Pollatsek, A., Lima, S. and Well, A.D.: 1981, ‘Concept or computation: Students’ understanding of the mean’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*12, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Roth, W-M. and McGinn, M.K.: 1998, ‘Inscriptions: Towards a theory of representing as social practice’,
*Review of Educational Research*68, 35–59.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J.M.: 1992, ‘Research on probability and statistics: Reflections and directions,’ in D. Grouws (ed.),
*Handbook of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics*, Macmillan, New York, pp. 465–494.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J.M., Garfiled, J. and Greer, B.: 1996, ‘Data handling’, in Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.),
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Part 1, 205–237.Google Scholar - Simon, M.A. and Blume, G.W.: 1996, ‘Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers’,
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*15, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Strauss, S. and Bichler, E.: 1988, ‘The development of children's concepts of the arithmetic mean',
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*19(1), 64–80.Google Scholar - Thompson, P.W.: 1994, ‘The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of speed', in G. Harel and J. Confrey (eds.),
*The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics*, SUNY Press, NY, pp. 179–234.Google Scholar - Thompson, P. and Saldanha, L.: 2000,
*To understand Post Counting Numbers and Operations*, White paper prepared for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Tzou, C.: 2000,
*Learning About Data Creation*, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar - von Glaserfeld, E.: 1995,
*Radical Constructivism: AWay of Knowing and Learning*, Falmer Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar - Wilensky, U.: 1997, ‘What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety',
*Educational studies on Mathematics*33, 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Voigt, J.: 1995, ‘Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms', in P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (eds.),
*The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures*, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 163–202.Google Scholar - Yackel, E. and Cobb, P.: 1996, ‘Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*27(4), 458–477.Google Scholar