Synthese

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 123–133 | Cite as

Concepts Structured Through Reduction: A Structuralist Resource Illuminates The Consolidation – Long-Term Potentiation (Ltp) Link

  • John Bickle
Article

Abstract

The structuralist program has developed a useful metascientific resource: ontological reductive links (ORLs) between the constituents of the potential models of reduced and reducing theories. This resource was developed initially to overcome an objection to structuralist ``global'' accounts of the intertheoretic reduction relation. But it also illuminates the way that concepts at a higher level of scientific investigation (e.g., cognitive psychology) become ``structured through reduction'' to lower-level investigations (e.g., cellular/molecular neuroscience). After (briefly) explaining this structuralist background, I demonstrate how this resource illuminates an actual, emerging scientific example: the link between the psychological concept of a ``consolidation switch'' from short-term to long-term memory and the cellular/molecular mechanisms of the transition from early- to late-phases of long-term potentiation (LTP) (an important type of synaptic plasticity in mammalian hippocampus and cortex).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., and Sneed, J. D.: 1987, An Architectonic for Science,Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Bickle, J.: 1998, Psychoneural Reduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., and Jessell, T. (eds.): 2000, Principles of Neural Science, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Lewin, B.: 1999, Genes VII, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Mayr, D.: 1976, 'Investigations of the Concept of Reduction I', Erkenntnis 10, 275–294.Google Scholar
  6. Mormann, T.: 1988, 'Structuralist Reduction Concepts as Structure-Preserving Maps', Synthese 77, 215–250.Google Scholar
  7. Moulines, C. U.: 1984, 'Ontological Reduction in the Natural Sciences', in W. Balzer, D. Pearce, and H. J. Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
  8. Moulines, C. U.: 1996, 'Structuralism: The Basic Ideas', in W. Balzer and C. U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Schaffner, K.: 1967, 'Approaches to Reduction', Philosophy of Science 34, 137–147.Google Scholar
  10. Squire, L.: 1987, Memory and Brain, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Squire, L. and Kandel, E.: 1999, Memory: From Mind to Molecules, Scientific American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Stegmüller, W.: 1976, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. Suppes, P.: 1956, Introduction to Logic, van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Bickle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Neuroscience Graduate ProgramUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations