Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 243–254 | Cite as

Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Marketing: The Ethics of the DoubleClick Experience

  • Darren Charters
Article

Abstract

The paper examines the ethics of electronic monitoring for advertising purposes and the implications for Internet user privacy using as a backdrop DoubleClick Inc’s recent controversy over matching previously anonymous user profiles with personally identifiable information. It explores various ethical theories that are applicable to understand privacy issues in electronic monitoring. It is argued that, despite the fact that electronic monitoring always constitutes an invasion of privacy, it can still be ethically justified on both Utilitarian and Kantian grounds. From a Utilitarian perspective the emphasis must be on minimizing potential harms. From a Kantian perspective the emphasis must be on giving users complete information so that they can make informed decisions as to whether they are willing to be monitored. Considering the Internet advertising industry’s current actions, computer users and government regulators would be well advised, both practically and ethically, to move to a user control model in electronic monitoring.

business marketing computer ethics cookies electronic monitoring privacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alder, G. S.: 1998,‘Ethical Issues in ElectronicPerformance Monitoring: A Consideration ofDeontological and Teleological Perspectives’Journal of Business Ethics 17(7) (May), 729–743.Google Scholar
  2. Boatright, M.: 2000,‘Privacy’ Ethics and the Conductof Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Saddle RiverNew Jersey), pp. 159–183.Google Scholar
  3. Culver, C., J. Moor, W. Duerfeldt, M. Kapp andM. Sullivan: 1994,‘Privacy’ Professional Ethics3(3 & 4), 3–25.Google Scholar
  4. Green, H.: 1999,‘Privacy Online – The FTC MustAct Now’ Business Week, No. 3657 (Nov. 29), 48.Google Scholar
  5. Introna, L. and A. Pouloudi: 1999,‘Privacy in theInformation Age: Stakeholders, Interests andValues’ The Journal of Business Ethics 22(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  6. McCloskey, H.: 1980,‘Privacy and the Right toPrivacy’ Philosophy 55(211), 17–38.Google Scholar
  7. Tuan, J.: 2000,‘U.S. West, Inc. v. FCC’ BerkeleyTechnology Law Journal 15, 353.Google Scholar
  8. ‘I-034: Internet Cookies’ U.S. Department of EnergyComputer Incident Advisory Capability. 1998.<http://ciac.IInI.gov/ciac/bulletins/i-034.shtm>(March 1, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. ‘IAB Privacy Guidelines’ Internet AdvertisingBureau. 2000. <http//www.iab.net/privacy guidelines/htm> (August 7, 2000).University of Waterloo School of Accountancy,200 University Avenue West,Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1,Hagey Hall, Room 155,Canada254 Darren ChartersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Charters
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Waterloo School of AccountancyWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations