Minds and Machines

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 137–142 | Cite as

The Turing Machine May Not Be the Universal Machine

  • Matjaz Gams
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, J.R. (1994), 'Mind, Evolution, and Computers', AI Magazine 15(1), pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
  2. Angell, I.O. (1993), 'Intelligence: Logical or Biological', Communications of the ACM 36(7), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  3. Bojadžiev, D. (2000), 'Is Consciousness Not a Computational Property?-Response to Caplain', Informatica 24(1), pp. 75–78.Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, M., ed. (1997), Software Agents, Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caplain, G. (2000), 'Reply to Bojadžiev', Informatica 24(1), pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, H.M. (1996), ‘Embedded or Embodied? A Review of Hubert Dreyfus’ What Computers Still Can't Do', Artificial Intelligence 80, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  7. Dreyfus, H.L. (1979), What Computers Can't Do, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Dunlop, C. (2000), 'Book Reviews', Minds and Machines 10(2), pp. 289–296.Google Scholar
  9. Edelman, G. (1992), Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Gams, M., Paprzycki, M. and Wu, X., eds. (1997), Mind versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right?, Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Applications 43, Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton, S. (1999), 'Taking Moore's Law into the Next Century', IEEE Computer January 1999, pp. 43–48.Google Scholar
  12. Hauser, L. (1997), 'Searle's Chinese box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument', Minds and Machines 7(2), pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
  13. Minsky, M. and Papert, S. (1969), Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, G.E. (1975), 'Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics', Technical Digest of 1975, International Electronic Devices Meeting 11.Google Scholar
  15. Moravec, H. (1988), Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Penrose, R. (1994), Shadows of the Mind, A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Searle, J.R. (1982), 'The Chinese Room Revisited', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, pp. 345–348.Google Scholar
  19. Sloman, A. (1992), 'The Emperor's Real Mind: Review of Penrose', Artificial Intelligence 56, pp. 335–396.Google Scholar
  20. Wegner, P. (1997), 'Why Interaction Is More Powerful Than Computing', Communications of the ACM 40(5), pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
  21. Wilkes, M.W. (1992), 'Artificial Intelligence As the Year 2000 Approaches', Communications of the ACM 35(8), pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  22. Winograd, T. (1991), 'Thinking Machines: Can There Be? Are We?', in Sheehan J, and Sosna M., eds., The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines, Berkeley, CA: University of Berkeley, pp. 198–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matjaz Gams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Intelligent SystemsJozef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations