Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 901–919 | Cite as

The Revolution Maximally Confused

  • Shalom Lappin
  • Robert D. Levine
  • David E. Johnson


Artificial Intelligence Revolution Maximally 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Applebaum, D.: 1996, Probability and Information: An Integrated Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, J.: 2001, 'On the Occurrence of Es with a Finite Clause in German', in W. D. Meurers and T. Kiss (eds.), Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
  3. Bošković, Z.: 1997, The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Bošković, Z.: 1998,' Multiple Wh-Fronting and Economy of Derivation', West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 16, 49–63.Google Scholar
  5. Bošković, Z. and D. Takahashi: 1998, 'Scrambling and Last Resort', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 347–366.Google Scholar
  6. Bresnan, J. W.: 2000, 'Optimal Syntax', in J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology, and Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 334–385.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1975, Reflections on Language, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N.: 1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1991, 'Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation', in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 417–454.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1992, 'Language and Interpretation: Philosophical Reflections and Empirical Inquiry', in J. Earman (ed.), Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1993, 'Naturalism and Dualism in the Study of Language and Mind', International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2, 181–209.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1995a, 'Language and Nature', Mind 104, 1–61.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.: 1995b, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, C.: 1997, Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, C.: 2001, 'Economy Conditions in Syntax', in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar
  16. Denham, K.: 2000, 'Optional Wh-Movement in Babine-Witsuwit'en', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 199–251.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, D.: 1995, 'Economy and Scope', Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–341.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, D.: 1999, Economy and Semantic Interpretation, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, Vol. 35, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Hinrichs, E. and W. Detmar Meurers: 2000, 'Some Remarks on Trends in HPSG', Unpublished paper presented at the International Workshop on HPSG, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  20. Hornstein, N.: 1999, 'Movement and Control', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69–96.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. E. and S. Lappin: 1997, 'A Critique of the Minimalist Program', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 273–333.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, D. E. and S. Lappin: 1999, Local Constraints vs. Economy, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  23. Kitahara, H.: 1997, Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Krifka, M.: 1998, 'Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 75–111.Google Scholar
  25. Kuhn, J.: 2001, 'Resource Sensitivity in the Syntax-Semantics Interface: Evidence from the German Split-NP Construction', in W. D. Meurers and T. Kiss (eds.), Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 177–215.Google Scholar
  26. Lappin, S., R. D. Levine, and D. E. Johnson: 2000, 'The Revolution Confused: A Response to Our Critics', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 873–890.Google Scholar
  27. Lasnik, H.: 1999, 'On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt Movement', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 197–218.Google Scholar
  28. Nakamura, M.: 1997, 'Object Extraction in Bantu Applicatives: Some Implications from Minimalism', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 252–280.Google Scholar
  29. Richards, N.: 1998, 'The Principle of Minimal Compliance', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 599–629.Google Scholar
  30. Roberts, I.: 2000, 'Current Developments in Generative Grammar', Ampersand n.v., 5.Google Scholar
  31. Sag, I. A.: 1997, 'English Relative Clause Constructions', Journal of Linguistics 33, 431–483.Google Scholar
  32. Uriagereka, J.: 1998, Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction toMinimalist Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Weinberg, S.: 2001 (May 31), 'Can Science Explain Everything? Anything?', New York Review of Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalom Lappin
    • 1
  • Robert D. Levine
    • 2
  • David E. Johnson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKing's CollegeLondonThe StrandLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsOhio-State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Mathematical Sciences DepartmentIBM T.J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations