Integrated Assessment

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 209–218 | Cite as

Transparency and Control in Engineering Integrated Assessment Models

  • Minh Ha-Duong

Abstract

Better software engineering such as archiving releases with version control, writing portable code, publishing documentation and results closely tied to the code improves integrated assessment models' transparency and control. A case study of four climate change policy analysis models found that source code and data was generally available, but for larger models licenses were more restrictive with respect to modification and redistribution. It is suggested that Free software licenses such as the GNU GPL would improve transparency and control. Moreover, opening the source allows opening the development process, a potentially important tool to improve collaboration, data sharing and models integration.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Alcamo, ed., IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, with Papers by The IMAGE Project (Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1994). Reprinted from Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 76(1/2).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    F.H. Clarke, Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche Mathématiques (CRM), 1989).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Kram, The energy technology systems analysis programme: History, the ETSAP Kyoto statement and post-Kyoto analysis, in: Experts Workshop on Climate Change and Economic Modelling: Background Analysis for the Kyoto Protocol, OCDE, 17–18 September 1998 (1998).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Lerner and J. Tirole, The simple economics of open source, Technical report, Harvard Business School, 25 February 2000 (2000).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A.S. Manne and R. Richels, Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Cost of CO 2 Emissions Limits (MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Moen, Fear of forking, Linuxcare Featured Article published online, 17 November 1999 (1999).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.G. Morgan and H. Dowlatabadi, Learning from integrated assessment of climate change, Climate Change 34 (1996) 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    W.D. Nordhaus, Managing the Global Commons (MIT Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.R. Ravetz, Integrated environmantal assessmant forum: developing guidelines for good practice, Technical Report WP-97-1, ULYSSES project, Darmstadt University of Technology, Germany, EAWAG, Human Ecology Division, Ueberlandstr. 133, CH-8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland (1997). <http://www.zit.tu-darmstadt.de/ulysses/ eWP97-1.pdf>.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    E.S. Raymond, La cathédrale et le bazar, Le Micro Bulletin 75 (1998) 81–112. Traduction de Sébastien Blondeel. Also published online at <http://www.tuxedo.org/esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar /cathedral-bazaar. html>.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Rotmans, Method for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3 (1998) 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S.H. Schneider, Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2(4) (1997) 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F.L. Toth, T. Bruckner, H.M. Füssel, M. Leimbach and G. Petschel-Held, The tolerable window approach to integrated assessments, in: IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models, eds. O.K. Cameron, K. Fukuwatari and T. Morita, NIES.CGER, 10–12 March 1997 (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minh Ha-Duong
    • 1
  1. 1.Chargé de Recherche au CIRED-CNRS, Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le DéveloppementCampus international du Jardin TropicalNogent sur Marne CEDEXFrance

Personalised recommendations