, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 145–164 | Cite as

The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process

  • Michael T. Kinnison
  • Andrew P. Hendry


We compiled a database of microevolution on contemporary time scales in nature (47 source articles; 30 animal species), comprising 2649 evolutionary rates in darwins (proportional change per million years) and 2151 evolutionary rates in haldanes (standard deviations per generation). Here we demonstrate how quantitative rate measures can provide general insights into patterns and processes of evolution. The frequency distribution of evolutionary rates was approximately log-normal, with many slow rates and few fast rates. Net selection intensities estimated from haldanes were on average lower than selection intensities commonly measured directly in natural populations. This difference suggests that natural selection could easily accomplish observed microevolution but that the intensities of selection typically measured in nature are rarely maintained for long (otherwise observed evolutionary rates would be higher). Traits closely associated with fitness (life history traits) appear to evolve at least as fast as traits less closely tied to fitness (morphology). The magnitude of evolutionary difference increased with the length of the time interval, particularly when maximum rates from a given study were considered. This pattern suggests a general underlying tendency toward increasing evolutionary diversification with time. However, evolutionary rates also tended to decrease with time, perhaps because longer time intervals average increasingly disparate rates over time, or because evolution slows when populations approach new optima or as genetic variation is depleted. In combination, our results suggest that macroevolutionary transitions may ultimately arise through microevolution occasionally ‘writ large’ but are perhaps temporally characterized by microevolution ‘writ in fits and starts’.

contemporary evolution darwins evolutionary rates genetic variation haldanes microevolution rapid evolution selection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, S.J., M.E. Pfrender & A.G. Jones, 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro-and macroevolution. Genetica 112-113: 9–32.Google Scholar
  2. Arnqvist, G. & D. Wooster, 1995. Metaanalysis - synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 236–240.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, N. & L. Partridge, 2000. Limits to natural selection. Bioessays 22: 1075–1084.Google Scholar
  4. Bone, E. & A. Farres, 2001. Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica 112-113: 165–182.Google Scholar
  5. Bookstein, F.L., 1987. Random walk and the existence of evolutionary rates. Paleobiology 13: 446–464.Google Scholar
  6. Bookstein, F.L., 1988. Random walk and the biometrics of morphological characters. Evol. Biol. 23: 369–398.Google Scholar
  7. Bürger, R. & M. Lynch, 1995. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49: 151–163.Google Scholar
  8. Charlesworth, B., 1984. Some quantitative methods for studying evolutionary patterns in single characters. Paleobiology 10: 308–318.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C.D., 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. J. Murray, London.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C.D., 1872. The Origin of Species. John Murray, London, 6th edn.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, J., S.L. Pimm, M.E. Gilpin & M. LeCroy, 1989. Rapid evolution of character displacement in Myzomelid honeyeaters. Am. Nat. 134: 675–708.Google Scholar
  12. Endler, J.A., 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  13. Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Fenster, E.J., M.K. Hecht & U. Sorhannus, 1992. Problems in the measurement of morphological rates of change. Ann. Zool. Fennici 28: 165–174.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, R.A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Gingerich, P.D., 1983. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science 222: 159–161.Google Scholar
  17. Gingerich, P.D., 1993. Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. Am. J. Sci. 293A: 453–478.Google Scholar
  18. Gingerich, P.D., 2001. Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process. Genetica 112-113: 127–144.Google Scholar
  19. Gould, S.J., 1984. Smooth curve of evolutionary rate: a psychological and mathematical artifact. Science 226: 994–995.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, P.R. & B.R. Grant, 1995. Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49: 241–251.Google Scholar
  21. Haldane, J.B.S., 1949. Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3: 51–56.Google Scholar
  22. Haugen, O.T. & L.A. Vøllestad, 2000. Population differences in early life-history traits in grayling. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 897–905.Google Scholar
  23. Haugen, O.T. & L.A. Vøllestad, 2001. A century of life-history evolution in grayling. Genetica 112-113: 475–491.Google Scholar
  24. Hedges, V.L. & I. Olkin, 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  25. Hendry, A.P. & M.T. Kinnison, 1999. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman, A.A., 2000. Laboratory and field heritabilities: some lessons from Drosophilia, pp. 200–218 in Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild, edited by T. Mousseau, B. Sinervo & J. Endler. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Houle, D., 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195–204.Google Scholar
  28. Huey, R.B., G.W. Gilchrist, M.L. Carlson, D. Berrigan & L. Serra, 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287: 308–309.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, J.B., G.C. Daily & P.R. Ehrlich, 1997. Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science 278: 689–692.Google Scholar
  30. Jablonski, D., 2000. Micro-and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26(Suppl.): 15–52.Google Scholar
  31. Kingsolver, J.G., H.E. Hoekstra, J.M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S.N. Vignieri, C.E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert & P. Beerli, 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural popualations. Am. Nat. 57: 245–261.Google Scholar
  32. Kruuk, L.E.B., T.H. Clutton-Brock, J. Slate, J.M. Pemberton, S. Brotherstone & F.E. Guinness, 2000. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 698–703.Google Scholar
  33. Lande, R., 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314–334.Google Scholar
  34. Larsson, K., H.P. van der Jeugd, I.T. van der Veen & P. Forslund, 1998. Body size declines despite positive directional selection on heritable size traits in a barnacle goose population. Evolution 52: 1169–1184.Google Scholar
  35. Lenski, R.E. & M. Travisano, 1994. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000–generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6808–6814.Google Scholar
  36. Lerman, A., 1965. On rates of evolution of unit characters and character complexes. Evolution 19: 16–25.Google Scholar
  37. Losos, J.B., D.A. Creer, D. Glossip, R. Goellner, A. Hampton, G. Roberts, N. Haskell, P. Taylor & J. Ettling, 2000. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 54: 301–305.Google Scholar
  38. Losos, J.B., T.W. Schoener, K.I. Warheit & D.A. Creer, 2001. Experimental studies of adaptive differentiation in Bahamanian Anolis lizards. Genetica 112-113: 399–415.Google Scholar
  39. Losos, J.B., K.I. Warheit & T.W. Schoener, 1997. Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards. Nature 387: 70–73.Google Scholar
  40. Lynch, M., 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. Am. Nat. 136: 727–741.Google Scholar
  41. Lynch, M., 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues, pp. 471–501 in Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature, edited by J. C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Merilä, J. & B.C. Sheldon, 1999. Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83: 103–109.Google Scholar
  43. Merilä, J. & B.C. Sheldon, 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155: 301–310.Google Scholar
  44. Merilä, J., B.C. Sheldon & L.E.B. Kruuk, 2001. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica 112- 113: 199–222.Google Scholar
  45. Mousseau, T.A. & D.A. Roff, 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181–197.Google Scholar
  46. Pergams, O.R.W. & M.V. Ashley, 1999. Rapid morphological change in channel island deer mice. Evolution 53: 1573–1581.Google Scholar
  47. Price, T. & D. Schluter, 1991. On the low heritability of life history traits. Evolution 45: 853–861.Google Scholar
  48. Reznick, D.N. & C.K. Ghalambor, 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112- 113: 183–198.Google Scholar
  49. Reznick, D.N., F.H. Shaw, F.H. Rodd & R.G. Shaw, 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275: 1934–1937.Google Scholar
  50. Roff, D.A., 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Roff, D.A. & T.A. Mousseau, 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103–118.Google Scholar
  52. Scharf, F.S., F. Juanes & M. Sutherland. 1998. Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of scatter diagrams: comparison of regression techniques. Ecology 79: 448–460.Google Scholar
  53. Schluter, D., 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. Schluter, D., T.D. Price & L. Rowe, 1991. Conflicting selection pressures and life history trade-offs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 246: 11–17.Google Scholar
  55. Sheets, H.D. & C.E. Mitchell, 2001a. Uncorrelated change produces the apparent dependence of evolutionary rate of interval. Paleobiology 27: 429–445.Google Scholar
  56. Sheets, H.D. & C.E. Mitchell, 2001b. Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution. Genetica 112-113: 105–125.Google Scholar
  57. Simpson, G.G., 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Simpson, G.G., 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Stearns, S.C., 1983a. The evolution of life-history traits in mosquitofish since their introduction to Hawaii in 1905: rates of evolution, heritabilities, and developmental plasticity. Am. Zool. 23: 65–76.Google Scholar
  61. Stearns, S.C., 1983b. The genetic basis of differences in life-history traits among six populations of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) that shared ancestors in 1905. Evolution 37: 618–627.Google Scholar
  62. Trussel, G.C., R.J. Etter. 2001. Integrating genetic and environmental forces that shape the evolution of geographical variation in a marine snail. Genetica 112-113: 321–337.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael T. Kinnison
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrew P. Hendry
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  3. 3.Organismic and Evolutionary Biology ProgramUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations