Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 87–92 | Cite as

New Europe; a political geography of fragmented unity

  • Herman van der Wusten
Article

Abstract

The Europe of the European Union has an ever more important set of policy arenas at the European level, still strong states, and a series of strong regions that put their demands on the table. The EU is deeply involved in its immediate surroundings and it acts in conjunction with member states in global policy forums. Europe is an unprecedented example of multi-level, multi-sector governance. Europe has been politically re-ordered on a number of occasions and this is one of them. In the current debate abundant use is made of historical examples. The new Europe is in need of institutional re-structuring. Following the traditions of European cooperation this is very slow in coming. Geographers should particularly be concerned with the consequences of terrioriality at several scales simultaneously.

multi-level governance territoriality post Cold War Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer C., 1994 (sec.ed.): Organizing Europe. The institutions of integration. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  2. Braudel F., 1949: La méditerranee et le monde méditerraneen à l'époque de Philippe II. Arman Colin, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Brook Chr., 1995: The drive to global regions. In: Anderson J. et al. (eds), A global world? Re-ordering political space, pp. 113–166, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Caporaso J.A., 2000: Changes in the Westphalian order: territory, public authoriy, and sovereignty. Int. Studies Rev. 2(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
  5. Conquest R.E., 2000: Reflections on a ravaged century. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Corbey D., 1993: Stilstand is vooruitgang. De dialectiek van het Europese integratieproces. Van Gorcum, Assen.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch K.W., 1957: Political community in the North Atlantic area: international organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrera M., Hemereijck A. and Rhodes M., 2000: Recasting European welfare states for the 21st century. European review 8(3): 427–446.Google Scholar
  9. Garton Ash T., 2000: Kosovo: anarchy and madness. New York Rev. Books 47(2), 48–53.Google Scholar
  10. Huntington S.P., 1996: The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Keating M., 1997: The invention of regions: political restructuring and territorial government inWestern Europe. Environment and Planning C 15: 383–398.Google Scholar
  12. Lieshout R.H., 1997: De organisatie van de West-Europese samenwerking: een voortdurende strijd om de macht. Coutinho, Bussum.Google Scholar
  13. Mackinder H.J., 1904: The geographical pivot of history. Geographical Journal 23: 421–442.Google Scholar
  14. Mann M., 1984: The autonomous power of the state:its origins, mechanisms and results. Arch. European Sociol. 25: 185–213.Google Scholar
  15. O'Loughlin J. and Van derWusten H., 1993: Political geography of war and peace. In: Taylor P.J. (ed.) Political geography of the twentieth century. A global analysis. pp. 63–114, Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam R.D., 1992: Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  17. Rokkan S., 1973: Cities, states, nations. A dimensional model for the study of contrasts in development. In: Eisenstadt S.N. and Rokkan S. (eds), Building states and nations, Vol. I, pp. 73–97. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  18. Sack R.W., 1986: Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Schulte Nordholt H., 2000: Een staat van geweld. Inaugural lecture, Rotterdam 31 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor P.J., 1995a: World cities and territorial states: the rise and fall of their mutuality. In: Knox P.L. and Taylor P.J. (eds), World cities in a world-system, pp. 48–62, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor P.J., 1995b: Beyond containers: internationality, interstateness, interterritoriality. Prog. Human Geogr. 19(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  22. Tilly Ch., 1992: Coercion, capital, and European states AD 990–1992. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Weaver O., 1997: Imperial metaphors: emerging European analogies to prenation-state imperial systems. In: O. Tunander et al. (eds), Geopolitics in post-wall Europe; security, territory and identity, pp. 59–93, Sage, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herman van der Wusten
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations