Genetica

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 417–434 | Cite as

Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs

  • Barry Sinervo

Abstract

Analysis of evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) and decade-long field studies indicate that two color morphs of female side-blotched lizards exhibit density- and frequency-dependent strategies. Orange females are r-strategists: they lay large clutches of small progeny that are favored at low density. Conversely, yellow females are K-strategists: they lay small clutches of large progeny that are favored when carrying capacity is exceeded and the population crashes to low density. Interactions among three male morphs resembles a rock-paper-scissors (RPS) game. Fertilization success of males depends on frequency of neighboring morphs. Orange males usurp territory from blue neighbors and thereby mate with many females. However, orange males are vulnerable to cuckoldry by sneaky yellow males that mimic females. The yellow strategy is thwarted in turn by the mate-guarding strategy of blue. Sinervo and Lively (1996) developed a simple asexual model of the RPS game. Here, we model the dynamics of male and female morphs with one- and two-locus genetic models. Male and female games were considered in isolation and modeled as games that were genetically coupled by the same locus. Parameters for payoff matrices, which describe the force of frequency-dependent selection in ESS games, were estimated from free-ranging animals. Period of cycles in nature was 5 years for males and 2 years for females. Only the one locus model with three alleles (o, b, y) was capable of driving rapid cycles in male and female games. Furthermore, the o allele must be dominant to the y allele in females. Finally, the amplitude of male cycles was only reproduced in genetic models which allowed for irreversible plasticity of by genotypes, which is consistent with hormonally-induced changes that transform some males with yellow to dark blue. We also critique experimental designs that are necessary to detect density- and frequency-dependent selection in nature. Finally, runaway ESS games are discussed in the context of self-reinforcing genetic correlations that build and promote the formation of morphotypic variation.

density-dependent selection frequency-dependent selection lizards morphs polymorphism social selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonzo, S. & B. Sinervo, 2000. Mate choice games, contextdependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 176–186.Google Scholar
  2. Alonzo, S.H. & R.R Warner, 2000. Female choice, conflict between the sexes and the evolution of male alternative reproductive behaviors. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 149–170.Google Scholar
  3. Begon, M., J.L. Harper & C.R. Townsend, 1996. Ecology. Black-Well Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Boag, P.T. & P.R. Grant, 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin' finches (Geospizinae) in the Galapagos. Science 214: 82–85.Google Scholar
  5. Boonstra, R., C. Krebs & N.C. Stenseth, 1998. Population cycles in small mammals: the problem of explaining the low phase. Ecology 79: 1479–1488.Google Scholar
  6. Brodie, E.D.I., 1992. Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46: 1284–1298.Google Scholar
  7. Calsbeek, R., S.H. Alonzo, K. Zamudio, & B. Sinervo, 2001. Small population size can maintain diversity in mating behaviors with unequal fitness. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond B, in press.Google Scholar
  8. Charlesworth, B., 1971. Selection in density-regulated populations. Ecology 52: 469–474.Google Scholar
  9. Chitty, D., 1958. Regulation in numbers through changes in viability. Can. J. Zool. 38: 99–113.Google Scholar
  10. Chitty, D., 1960. Population forces in the vole and their relevance to general theory. Cold Spring Harbour Symp. Quant. Biol. 22: 277–280.Google Scholar
  11. Chitty, D., 1996. Do Lemmings Commit Suicide: Beautiful Hypotheses and Ugly Facts? Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, W.E. & N. Greenberg, 1992. Reptilian coloration and behavior, pp. 298–422 in Biology of the Reptilian: Hormones, Brain, and Behavior, edited by D. Crews. & C. Gans. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  13. DeNardo, D.F. & P. Licht, 1993. Effects of corticosterone on social behavior of male lizards. Horm. Behav. 27: 184–199.Google Scholar
  14. DeNardo, D.F. & B. Sinervo, 1994a. Effects of corticosterone on activity and territory size of free-ranging male lizards. Horm. Behav. 28: 53–65.Google Scholar
  15. DeNardo, D.F. & B. Sinervo, 1994b. Effects of steroid hormone interaction on territorial behavior of male lizards. Horm. Behav. 28: 273–287.Google Scholar
  16. Endler, J.A., 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  17. Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C. MacKay, 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Press, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Finch, C.E. & M.R. Rose, 1995. Hormones and the physiological architecture of life history evolution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 70: 1–52.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, R.A., 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52: 399–433.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, D.L., 1976. Animal Biochromes and Structural Colours: Physical, Chemical, Distributional and Physiological Features of Coloured Bodies in the Animal World. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Gibbs, H.L. & P.R. Grant, 1987. Oscillating selection on Darwin' Finches. Nature 327: 511–513.Google Scholar
  22. Greene, E., B.E. Lyon, V.R. Muehter, L. Ratcliffe, S.J. Oliver & P.T. Boag, 2000. Disruptive sexual selection for plumage coloration in a passerine bird. Nature 407: 1000–1003.Google Scholar
  23. Hews, D.K., R. Knapp & M.C. Moore, 1994. Early exposure to androgens affects adult expression of alternative male types in tree lizards. Horm. Behav. 28: 96–115.Google Scholar
  24. Hews, D.K. & M.C. Moore, 1995. Influence of androgens on differentiation of secondary sex characters in tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 97: 86–102.Google Scholar
  25. Houde, A.E., 1994. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256: 125–130.Google Scholar
  26. Hudson, P.J., A.P. Dobson & D. Newborn, 1998. Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science 282: 2256–2258.Google Scholar
  27. Hulbert, S.H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monographs 54: 187–211.Google Scholar
  28. Lande, R. & S.J. Arnold, 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210–1226.Google Scholar
  29. Li, C.C., 1975. Path Analysis - A Primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
  30. Lidicker, W.Z., J.O. Wolff & R.A. Mowrey, 2000. Genetic change in a cyclic population of snowshoe hares. Ecoscience 7: 247–255.Google Scholar
  31. Lochmiller, R.L. & C.B. Dabbert, 1993. Immunocompetence, environmental stress, and the regulation of animal populations. Trends in Comparat. Biochem. Physiol. 1: 823–855.Google Scholar
  32. Maynard Smith, J., 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith, J., 1998. Evolution and Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell-Olds, T. & R.G. Shaw,1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149–1161.Google Scholar
  35. Moorcroft, P.R., S.D. Albon, J.M. Pemberton, I.R. Stevenson & T.H. Clutton-Brock, 1996. Density-dependent selection in a fluctuating ungulate population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 31–38.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, M.C., 1988. Testosterone control of territorial behavior: tonic-release implants fully restore seasonal and short-term aggressive responses in free-living castrated lizards. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 65: 225–232.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, M.C., 1991. Application of organization-activation theory to alternative male strategies: a review. Horm. Behav. 25: 154–179.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, M.C. & C.W. Thompson, 1990. Field endocrinology of alternative male reproductive tactics. Progress in clinical and biological research, edited by A. Epple, C.G. Scanes and M.H. Stetson. 342: 685–690.Google Scholar
  39. Morrison, R.L., W.C. Sherbrooke & S.K. Frost-Mason, 1996. Temperature sensitive, physiologically active iridophores in the lizard Urosaurus ornatus: an ultrastructural analysis of color change. Copeia 4: 806–812.Google Scholar
  40. Mueller, L.D., 1997. Theoretical and empirical examinations of density-dependent selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 269–288.Google Scholar
  41. Mueller, L.D. & F.J. Ayala, 1981. Trade-off between r- selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations. PNAS 78: 1303–1305.Google Scholar
  42. Mueller, L.D., G. Pingzhong & F.J. Ayala, 1991. Density-dependent natural selection and trade-offs in life history traits. Science 253: 433–435.Google Scholar
  43. Provine, W., 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  44. Roughgarden, J., 1971. Density-dependent natural selection. Ecology 52: 453–468.Google Scholar
  45. Schluter, D., 1994. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266: 798–801.Google Scholar
  46. Schluter, D., 1996. Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 351: 807–814.Google Scholar
  47. Shuster, S.M. & C. Sassaman, 1997. Genetic interaction between male strategy and sex ratio in a marine isopod. Nature 388: 373–377.Google Scholar
  48. Sinervo, B., 1997. Adaptive maternal effects in lizards, pp. 288–306 in Adaptive Maternal Effects, edited by T. Mousseau & C. Fox. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  49. Sinervo, B., 1999. Mechanistic analysis of natural selection and a refinement of Lack' and William' principles. Am. Natural. 154 SUPPL: S26–S42.Google Scholar
  50. Sinervo, B., 2000. Adaptation, natural selection, and optimal life history allocation in the face of genetically-based trade-offs, pp. 41–64 in Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild, edited by T. Mousseau, B. Sinervo & J.A. Endler. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  51. Sinervo, B., 2001. Selection in local neighborhoods, graininess of social environments, and the ecology of alternative strategies, pp. 191–226 in Model Systems in Behavioral Ecology, edited by L. Dugatkin. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  52. Sinervo, B. & A.L. Basolo, 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations, pp. 149–185 in Adaptation edited by M.R. Rose & G.V. Lauder. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  53. Sinervo, B. & D.F. DeNardo, 1996. Costs of reproduction in the wild: path analysis of natural selection and experimental tests of causation. Evolution 50: 1299–1313.Google Scholar
  54. Sinervo, B. & P. Licht, 1991a. The physiological and hormonal control of clutch size, egg size, and egg shape in Uta stansburiana: constraints on the evolution of lizard life histories. J. Exp. Zool. 257: 252–264.Google Scholar
  55. Sinervo, B. & P. Licht, 1991b. Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, egg number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Science 252: 1300–1302.Google Scholar
  56. Sinervo, B. & C.M. Lively, 1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies. Nature 380: 240–243.Google Scholar
  57. Sinervo, B., D.B. Miles, D.F. DeNardo, W.A. Frankino & M. Klukowski, 2000a. Testosterone, endurance, and Darwinian fitness: proximate bases of the rock-paper-scissors game of alternative male strategies. Horm. Behav. 38: 222–233.Google Scholar
  58. Sinervo, B., E. Svensson & T. Comendant, 2000b. Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 406: 985–988.Google Scholar
  59. Sinervo, B. & E. Svensson, 1998. Mechanistic and selective causes of life history trade-offs and plasticity. Oikos 83: 432–442.Google Scholar
  60. Sinervo, B. and E. Svensson. in press. Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity in press.Google Scholar
  61. Sinervo, B. & K. Zamudio, 2001. Genetic correlations between the sexes, fitness differentials, and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies. J. Hered. (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Sinervo, B., C. Bleay & C. Adamopoulou, 2001. Social causes of correlational selection and the resolution of a heritable throat color polymorphism in a lizard. Evolution, in press.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, T.B., 1993. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphisms in the African Finch Pyrenestes. Nature 363: 618–620.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, T.B., 1997. Adapative significance of the mega-billed form in the polymorphic black-bellied seedcracker Pyrenestes ostrinus. Ibis 139: 382–387.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, T.B., & D.J. Girman, 1999. Reaching new adaptive peaks: evolution of alternative adaptive bill forms in an African finch, in Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild, edited by T. Mousseau, B. Sinervo & J. Endler. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  66. Stearns, S.C., 1977. The evolution of life history traits: a critique of the theory and a review of the data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8: 145–171.Google Scholar
  67. Stearns, S.C., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories.Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  68. Svensson, E., B. Sinervo & T. Comendant, 2001. Competitive stress and selection on immune function in genetic lizard morphs. PNAS, in press.Google Scholar
  69. Svensson, E., B. Sinervo & T. Comendant, Condition, genotypeby-environment interaction and correlational selection in lizard life-history morphs. Evolution, in press.Google Scholar
  70. Svensson, E. & B. Sinervo, 2000. Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size. Evolution 54: 1396–1403.Google Scholar
  71. Travis, J. & L.D. Mueller, 1989. Blending ecology and genetics: progress towards a unified population biology, in Perspectives in Ecological Theory, edited by J. Roughgarden, R.M. May & S.A. Levin. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  72. Wade, M.J. & S. Kalisz, 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44: 1947–1955.Google Scholar
  73. Wiens, J.J., 2000. Decoupled evolution of display morphology and display behaviour in phrynosomatid lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70: 597–612.Google Scholar
  74. Whitlock, M.C., P.C. Phillips, F.B.-G. Moore & S.J. Tonsor, 1995. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 601–629.Google Scholar
  75. Wright, S., 1920. The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea pigs. PNAS 6: 320–332.Google Scholar
  76. Wright, S., 1984. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  77. Zamudio, K. & B. Sinervo, 2000. Polygyny, mate-guarding, and posthumous fertilizations as alternative male strategies. PNAS 97: 14427–14432.Google Scholar
  78. Zeng, Z., R.M. Nowierski, M.L Taper, B. Dennis & W.P. Kemp, 1996. Complex population dynamics in the real world. Modeling the influence of time varying parameters and time lags. Ecology 79: 2193–2209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Sinervo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations