Advertisement

Genetica

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 245–256 | Cite as

Microevolution in island rodents

  • Oliver R.W. Pergams
  • Mary V. Ashley
Article

Abstract

We perform a meta-analysis on morphological data from four island rodent populations exhibiting microevolution (>≈ 100 years). Data consisting of incidences of skeletal variants, cranial, and external measurements are from house mice (Mus musculus) on one Welsh and one Scottish island, black rats (Rattus rattus) on two Galapagos islands, and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) on three California Channel islands. We report extremely high rates of microevolution for many traits; 60% of all mensural traits measured changed at a rate of 600 d or greater (max. 2682 d). The proportion of all mensural traits evolving at 600–800 d (23%) was idiosyncratic and departed from an expected negative exponential distribution. We argue that selection, rather than founder events, is largely responsible for the substantial shifts in morphology seen among insular rodents. Examining individual traits, there is a trend towards the nose becoming longer and wider, while the skull becomes shallower, shown by both rats and mice on five different islands. We found a significant correlation between island size and degree of skeletal variant evolution and between island distance from the mainland (or nearest island) and degree of cranial and external character evolution. Thus, microevolution of rodents is greater on smaller and more remote islands.

evolution islands mensural traits microevolution Mus musculus Peromyscus maniculatus Rattus rattus rodents skeletal variants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, G.H. & R. Levins, 1994. The island syndrome in rodent populations. Quart. Rev. Biol. 69: 473–490.Google Scholar
  2. Affifi, A.A. & V. Clark, 1996. Computer-aided Multivariate Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  3. Allard, M.W. & I.F. Greenbaum, 1988. Morphological variation and taxonomy of chromosomally differentiated Peromyscus from the Pacific Northwest. Can. J. Zool. 66: 2734–2739.Google Scholar
  4. Aquadro, C.F. & C.W. Kilpatrick, 1981. Morphological and biochemical variation and differentiation in insular and mainland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), pp. 214–230 in Mammalian Population Genetics, edited by M.H. Smith & J. Joule. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
  5. Ashley, M. & C. Wills, 1987. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms among Channel island deer mice. Evolution41: 854–863.Google Scholar
  6. Boag, P.T. & P.R. Grant, 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin' finches (Geospizinae) in the Galápogos.Science 214: 82–85.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, R.J., 1963. Epigenetic polymorphism in wild populations of Mus musculus. Genet. Res. Camb. 4: 193–220.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, R.J., 1964. The evolution of an island population of the house mouse. Evolution 18: 468–483.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, R.J., 1969. History in the evolution of Apodemus sylvaticus (Mammalia) at one edge of its range. J. Zool. London 159: 311–328.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, R.J., 1970. Covert and overt variation, as exemplified by British mouse populations. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 26: 3–26.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, R.J., 1975. On the nature of genetical distance and island races of Apodemus sylvaticus. J. Zool. London 176: 293–296.Google Scholar
  12. Berry, R.J., 1986. Genetics of the insular populations of mammals, with particular reference to differentiation and founder effects in British small mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 28: 205–230.Google Scholar
  13. Berry, R.J. & M.E. Jakobson, 1975. Ecological genetics of an island population of the House mouse. J. Zool. London 175: 523–540.Google Scholar
  14. Berry, R.J. & F.E.N. Rose, 1975. Islands and the evolution of Microtis arvalis (Microtinae). J. Zool. London 177: 395–409.Google Scholar
  15. Berry, R.J. & H.M. Murphy, 1970. Biochemical genetics of an island population of the house mouse. Proc. Royal Soc. London B 176: 87–103.Google Scholar
  16. Berry, R.J. & J. Peters, 1975. Macquarie island house mice: a genetical isolate on a sub-Antarctic island. J. Zool. London 176: 375–389.Google Scholar
  17. Berry, R.J. & J. Peters, 1976. Genes, survival and adjustment in island population of the house mouse, pp. 23–48 in Population Genetics and Ecology, edited by S. Karlin & E. Nevo. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Berry, R.J. & B.J.K. Tricker, 1969. Competition and extinction: the mice of Foula, with notes on those of Fair isle and St Kilda. J. Zool. London 158: 247–265.Google Scholar
  19. Berry, R.J., M.E. Jakobson & J. Peters, 1978. The house mice of the Faroe islands: a study in microdifferentiation. J. Zool. London 185: 573–592.Google Scholar
  20. Berry, R.J., J. Peters & R.J. van Aarde, 1978. Sub-Antarctic house mice: colonization, survival and selection. J. Zool. London 184: 127–141.Google Scholar
  21. Berry, R.J., W.N. Bonner & J. Peters, 1979. Natural selection in house mice (Mus musculus) from South Georgia (South Atlantic Ocean). J. Zool. London 189: 385–398.Google Scholar
  22. Calhoun, S.W. & I.F. Greenbaum, 1991. Evolutionary implications of genic variation among insular populations of Peromyscus maniculatus and Peromyscus oreas. J. Mammal. 72: 248–262.Google Scholar
  23. Clarke, W.E., 1904. On some forms of Mus musculus, Linnaeus, with description of a new subspecies from the Faroe islands. Proc. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh 15: 160–167.Google Scholar
  24. Collins, P.W., J. Storrer & K. Rindlaub, 1979. XI. Vertebrate zoology: biology of the deer mouse, pp, 11.1–11.74 in A Natural Resources Study of the Channel Islands National Park, California, edited by D.M. Power. Final Technical Report to the U.S. National Park Service. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Corbet, G.B., 1964. Regional variation in the bank-vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, in the British Isles. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 143: 191–219.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, S.J.M., 1983. Morphometric variation of populations of house mouse Mus domesticus in Britain and Faroe. J. Zool. London 199: 521–534.Google Scholar
  27. Dobzhansky, T., 1941. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, N.Y., 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  28. Drost, C.A. & G.M. Fellers, 1991. Density cycles in an island population of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus. Oikos 60: 351–364.Google Scholar
  29. Erickson, W.A. & W.L. Halvorsen, 1990. Ecology and control of the roof rat (Rattus rattus) in Channel islands National Park. Technical Report No. 38 to the National Park Service.Google Scholar
  30. Foster, B.F., 1964. Evolution of mammals on islands. Nature 202: 234.Google Scholar
  31. Gill, A.E., 1980. Evolutionary genetics of California islands Peromyscus, pp. 719–744 in The California Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium, edited by D. M. Power. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, C.A.Google Scholar
  32. Gingerich, P.D., 1983. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science 222: 159–161.Google Scholar
  33. Gliwicz, J., 1980. Island populations of rodents: their organization and function. Biol. Rev. 55: 109–138.Google Scholar
  34. Haldane, J.B.S., 1949. Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3: 51–56.Google Scholar
  35. Heaney, L.R., 1978. Island area and body size of insular mammals: evidence from the tri-colored squirrel (Callosciurus prevosti) of southeast Asia. Evolution 32: 29–44.Google Scholar
  36. Hendry, A.P. & M.T. Kinnison, 1999. Perspective: the pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653.Google Scholar
  37. Huxley, J.S., 1942. Evolution, theModern Synthesis. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  38. Kinnison, M.T. & A.P. Hendry. The pace of modern life. II: From rates to pattern and process. Genetica (in press).Google Scholar
  39. Lawlor, T.E., 1982. The evolution of body size in mammals: evidence from insular populations in Mexico. Am. Natural. 119: 60.Google Scholar
  40. Leamy, L., 1974. Heritability of osteometric traits in a randombred population of mice. J. Hered. 65: 109–120.Google Scholar
  41. Lomolino, M.V., 1985. Body size of mammals on islands: the island rule revisited. Am. Natural. 125: 310.Google Scholar
  42. Matthews, L.H., 1952. British Mammals. London, Collins New Naturalist.Google Scholar
  43. Melton, R.H., 1982. Body size and island Peromyscus: a pattern and a hypothesis. Evol. Theory 6: 113–126.Google Scholar
  44. Patton, J.L., S.Y. Yang & P. Myers, 1975. Genetic and morphological divergence among introduced rat populations (Rattus rattus) of the Galapagos archipelago, Equador. Systemat. Zool. 24: 296–310.Google Scholar
  45. Pergams, O.R.W. & M.V. Ashley, 1999. Rapid morphological change in Channel island deer mice. Evolution 53: 1573–1581.Google Scholar
  46. Pergams, O.R.W. & M.V. Ashley, 2000. California island deer mice: genetics, morphometrics, and evolution, pp. 278–288 in Proc. 5th California Islands Symp., 29 March to 1 April 1999, edited by D.R. Browne, K.L. Mitchell, & H.W. Chaney. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA. Sponsored by the U.S. Minerals Management Service, Pacific OCS Region, 770 Paseo Camarillo, Camarillo, CA 93010. OCS Study No. 99–0038.Google Scholar
  47. Pergams, O.R.W., R.C. Lacy & M.V. Ashley, 2000. Conservation and management of Anacapa island deer mice. Conserv. Biol. 14: 819–832.Google Scholar
  48. Rohlf, F.J. & R.R. Sokal, 1981. Statistical Tables. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  49. SPSS, Inc. 2000a. SYSTAT v. 9.0. Computer program. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  50. SPSS, Inc. 2000b. SYSTAT v. 9.0. Statistics II. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  51. Voss, R.S., L.F. Marcus & P. Escalente P., 1990. Morphological evolution in muroid rodents. I. Conservative patterns of craniometric covariance and their ontogenetic basis in the neotropical genus Zygodontomys. Evolution 44: 1568–1587.Google Scholar
  52. Yom-Tov, Y., S. Yom-Tov & H. Moller, 1999. Competition, coexistence, and adaptation amongst rodent invaders to Pacific and New Zealand islands. J. Biogeograph. 26: 947–958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver R.W. Pergams
    • 1
  • Mary V. Ashley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066)University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066)University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations