Advertisement

Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 2, Issue 1–2, pp 31–42 | Cite as

Constraints on E-commerce in Less Developed Countries: The Case of China

  • Stephen Chen
  • Jian Ning
Article

Abstract

We suggest a revised framework based on Michael Porter's Diamond of National Competitive Advantage that can be applied in examining development of e-commerce in less-developed countries. This incorporates cross-industry institutions and networks as key determinants of national competitive advantage. Using this framework we show that China has made significant progress in building the technical infrastructure and regulatory framework for e-commerce. However, it suffers still from poorly developed institutions and social networks. These are crucial in moving into the second phase of development of electronic commerce where the technologies are integrated into existing industries.

e-commerce LDC's industry clusters national competitive advantage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Archibugi, D. and J. Michie. (1997). Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Business Software Alliance. (2000). “1999 Global Software Piracy Report.” Available at http://www.bsa.org/usa/globallib/piracy/piracystats99.phtml.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Doeringer, P.B. and D.G. Terkla. (1999). “Business Strategy and Cross-Industry Clusters.” In J.P. Blair and L.A. Reese (eds.), Approaches to Economic Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Clinton, W.J. and A. Gore. (1997). “A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce.” Available at http://www.ecommerce.gov/framewrk.htm.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cohen, S.S. and G. Fields. (1999). “Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley.” California Management Review 41(2), 108–130.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Goldstein, A. and D. O'Connor. (2000). E-commerce for Development: Prospects and Policy Issues. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hansen, M.T., H.W. Chesbrough, N. Nohria, and D.N. Sull. (2000). “Networked Incubators: Hothouses of the New Economy.” Harvard Business Review, September-October, 74–84.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Internet Economy Indicators. (2000). “June 2000 Internet Economy Indicators.” Available at http://www.internetindicators.com.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Mansell, R. and U. Wehn. (1998). Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Porter, M.E. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Smilor, R.W., D.V. Gibson and G. Kozmetsky. (1988). “Creating the Technopolis: High-Technology Development in Austin, Texas.” Journal of Business Venturing 4, 49–67.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Thomadakis, S.B. (1998). “Coordinated Industrialization: Institutional agendas of less favored countries.” In M. Storper, S.B. Thomadakis and L.J. Tsipouri (eds.), Latecomers in the Global Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yeager, T.J. (1999). Institutions, Transition Economies and Economic Development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zhao, P. and D.J. Grimshaw. (1991). “A Comparative Study of the Application of IT in China and the West: Culture and Stages of Growth Model.” Warwick Business School Research Papers No. 32. Coventry: Warwick Business School.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Chen
    • 1
  • Jian Ning
    • 2
  1. 1.Anderson School of ManagementUCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Manchester Business SchoolManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations