Advertisement

Distributed and Parallel Databases

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 33–51 | Cite as

Workflow Architecture for Interactive Video Management Systems

  • Elisa Bertino
  • Alberto Trombetta
  • Danilo Montesi
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

This paper introduces an interactive video system and its architecture where several systems cooperate to manage the services of interactive video. Each system is specialized according to the data it handles and the functionality it performs. A system can be a database (for billing purposes) or just a video store system (to store the video data) lacking the typical features of a database or an information retrieval system to support indexing and querying of video data. Because quality of service is an important requirement for whole management system, a specific system is introduced in the architecture. Such system monitors the bandwidth of the network, the buffer size and the frame size and rate. The resulting architecture of interactive video system consists of several systems cooperating through an active rules based workflow system to integrate their functionalities while preserving autonomy, extensibility and data integrity where necessary.

interactive video workflow system active rules databases distributed systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Bernstein, “Middleware: A model for distributed system services,” Communications of the ACM, pp. 86–98, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Brink, S. Marcus, and V.S. Subrahmanian, “Heterogeneous multimedia reasoning,” Computer, pp. 33–39, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.S. Candan, B. Prabhakaran, and V.S. Subrahmanian, “Retrieval schedule based on resource avaliability and flexible presentation specification,” Submitted.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.K. Elmagarmid et al., Video Database Systems. Issues, Products and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Fuhr, “Logical and conceptual models for the integration of information retrieval and database systems,” in Proc. Second East-West Workshop on Database, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Fuhr, “Modelling hypermedia retrieval in datalog,” in Proc. Conf. Hypertext, Information Retrieval, Multimedia, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Fuhr, “Probabilistic datalog--A logic for powerful retrieval methods,” in Proc. of the ACM conference in Information Retrieval, 1995, pp. 282–290.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Hjelsvold and R. Midtstraum, “Modelling and querying video data,” in Very Large Data Bases, 1994, pp. 686–694.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Jiang, D. Montesi, and A.K. Elmagarmid, “VideoText database systems,” in International Conference Multimedia Computing and Systems, IEEE Press, Ottawa, pp. 344–351, 1997. See http://proximity.cs. purdue.edu:7000/vdb/index.html.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.W. Kerr, “Servers for british telecom's interactive TV services,” BT Technology Journal, vol. 13, no.4, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Krishnakumar and A. Sheth, “Managing heterogeneous multisystems tasks to support enterprise-wide operations,” Distributed and Parallel Databases, vol. 3, no.2, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.D.C. Little and D. Venkatesh, “Prospects for interactive video on demand,” IEEE Multimedia, Fall 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Miller, A.P. Shet, K.J. Kochut, and X. Wang, “CORBA-based run-time architecture for workflow management systems,” Journal of Database Management, vol. 7, no.1, 1996, pages 16–27.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.A. Miller et al., “The future of web-based workflows,” in Proc. of International Workshop on Research Directions in Process Technology, Nancy, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Montesi, “Multimedia databases: Integrating relational, text, hypertext, image and video databases,” in Proc. International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Montesi and R. Torlone, “A transaction transformation approach to active rule processing,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, Taipei (Taiwan), IEEE Press, 1995, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    OMG, “The common object request broker: Architecture and specification,” Technical Report, Object Management Group, July 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Salton, Automatic Text Processing. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Walker, P. Foster, and S. Banthorpe, “Content production and delivery for interactive multimedia services--A new approach,” BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, no.2, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisa Bertino
    • 1
  • Alberto Trombetta
    • 1
  • Danilo Montesi
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations