Genetica

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 383–398 | Cite as

Refugial isolation versus ecological gradients

  • Thomas B. Smith
  • Christopher J. Schneider
  • Karen Holder
Article

Abstract

Hypotheses for divergence and speciation in rainforests generally fall into two categories: those emphasizing the role of geographic isolation and those emphasizing the role of divergent selection along gradients. While a majority of studies have attempted to infer mechanisms based on the pattern of species richness and congruence of geographic boundaries, relatively few have tried to simultaneously test alternative hypotheses for diversification. Here we discuss four examples, taken from our work on diversification of tropical rainforest vertebrates, in which we examine patterns of genetic and morphological variation within and between biogeographic regions to address two alternative hypotheses. By estimating morphological divergence between geographically contiguous and isolated populations under similar and different ecological conditions, we attempt to evaluate the relative roles of geographic isolation and natural selection in population divergence. Results suggest that natural selection, even in the presence of appreciable gene flow, can result in morphological divergence that is greater than that found between populations isolated for millions of years and, in some cases, even greater than that found between congeneric, but distinct, species. The relatively small phenotypic divergence that occurs among long-term geographic isolates in similar habitats suggests that morphological divergence via drift may be negligible and/or that selection is acting to produce similar phenotypes in populations occupying similar habitats. Our results demonstrate that significant phenotypic divergence: (1) is not necessarily coupled with divergence in neutral molecular markers; and (2) can occur without geographic isolation in the presence of gene flow.

divergence with gene flow drift mtDNA natural selection speciation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benkman, C.W., 1991. Predation, seed size partitioning and the evolution of body size in seed-eating finches. Evol. Ecol. 5: 118–127.Google Scholar
  2. Boag, P.T. & A. van Noordwijk, 1987. Quantitative genetics, pp. 45–78 in Avian Genetics: A Population and Ecological Approach, edited by F. Cooke & P.A. Buckley. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Chapin, J.P., 1924. Size-variation in Pyrenestes, a genus of weaver-finch. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 49: 415–441.Google Scholar
  4. Chapin, J.P., 1954. The birds of the Belgian Congo. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 75, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Charlesworth, B., 1994. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Dieckmann, U. & M. Doebeli, 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354–357.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, S.V. & P. Beerli, 2000. Gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54: 1839–1854.Google Scholar
  8. Endler, J.A., 1982a. Problems in distinguishing historical from ecological factors in biogeography. Am. Zool. 22: 441–452.Google Scholar
  9. Endler, J.A., 1982b. Pleistocene forest refuges: fact or fancy, in Biological Diversification in the Tropics, edited by G.T. Prance. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Fjeldså, J. & J.C. Lovett, 1997. Geographical patterns of old and young species in African forest biota: the significance of specific montane areas as evolutionary centres. Biodiv. Cons. 6: 325–346.Google Scholar
  11. Fridolfsson, A.K. & H. Ellegren, 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J. Avian Biol. 30: 116–121.Google Scholar
  12. Funk, D.J., 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52: 1744–1759.Google Scholar
  13. Gans, C., 1975. Tetrapod limblessness: evolution and functional corollaries. Am. Zool. 15: 455–467.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia-Moreno, J. & J. Fjeldså, 2000. Chronology and mode of speciation in the Andean avifauna. Bonn. Zool. Monogr. 46: 25–46.Google Scholar
  15. Garcia-Paris, M., D.A. Good, G. Parra-Olea & D.B. Wake, 2000. Biodiversity of Costa Rican salamanders: implications of high levels of genetic differentiation and phylogeographic structure for species formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 1640–1647.Google Scholar
  16. Gavrilets, S., 2000. Waiting time to parapatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2483–2492.Google Scholar
  17. Gavrilets, S., H. Li & M.D. Vose, 2000. Patterns of parapatric speciation. Evolution 54: 1126–1134.Google Scholar
  18. Grant, P.R., 1986. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin' Finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  19. Haffer, J., 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165: 131–137.Google Scholar
  20. Haffer, J., 1974. Avian speciation in tropical South America. Publ. Nutt. Ornithol. Club 14, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  21. Haffer, J., 1993. Time' cycle and time' arrow in the history of Amazonia. Biogeographica 69: 15–45.Google Scholar
  22. Haffer, J., 1997. Alternative models of vertebrate speciation in Amazonia: an overview. Biodiv. Cons. 6: 451–477.Google Scholar
  23. Hendry, A.P., 2001. Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112-113: 515–534.Google Scholar
  24. Hendry, A.P., J.K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E.C. Volk & T.P. Quinn, 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516–518.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, K.P. & M.D. Sorenson, 1998. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND2) in the dabbling ducks (Tribe: Anatini). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 10: 82–94.Google Scholar
  26. Keith, S., E.K. Urban & C.H. Fry, 1992. The Birds of Africa. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kondrashov, A.S. & F.A. Kondrashov, 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351–354.Google Scholar
  28. Korol, A., E. Rashkovetsky, K. Iliadi, P. Michalak, Y. Ronin & E. Nevo, 2000. Nonrandom mating in Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations derived from closely adjacent ecologically contrasting slopes at ‘Evolution Canyon’. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 12637–12642.Google Scholar
  29. Longman, K.A. & J. Jenik, 1992. Forest-savanna boundaries: general considerations, pp. 3–20 in Nature and Dynamics of Forest-Savanna Boundaries, edited by P.A. Furley, J. Proctor & J.A. Ratter. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Losos, J.B., T.W. Schoener, K.I. Warheit & D. Creer, 2001. Experimental studies of adaptive differentiation in Bahamian Anolis lizards. Genetica 112-113: 399–415.Google Scholar
  31. Louette, M., 1981. The birds of Cameroon. An annotated checklist. Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie. Klasse der Wetenschappen, Brussels.Google Scholar
  32. Lovette, I.J. & E. Bermingham, 1999. Explosive speciation in the New World Dendroica warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1629–1636.Google Scholar
  33. Lu, G. & L. Bernatchez, 1999. Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis): support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution 53: 1491–1505.Google Scholar
  34. Lynch, M. & K. Ritland, 1999. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 1753–1766.Google Scholar
  35. Maynard Smith, J., 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637–650.Google Scholar
  36. Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Mayr, E. & R.J. O'Hara, 1986. The biogeographical evidence supporting the Pleistocene forest refuge hypothesis. Evolution 40: 55–67.Google Scholar
  38. McMillan, W.O., C.D. Jiggins & J. Mallet, 1997. What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 8628–8633.Google Scholar
  39. Moritz, C., L. Joseph, C. Cunningham & C.J. Schneider, 1997. Molecular perspectives on historical fragmentation of Australian tropical and subtropical rainforest: implications for conservation, pp. 442–454 in Tropical Forest Remnants, edited by W. Laurance & R. Bierregard. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Moritz, C., J.L. Patton, C.J. Schneider & T.B. Smith, 2000. Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 533–563.Google Scholar
  41. Orr, M.R. & T.B. Smith, 1998. Ecology and speciation. TREE 13: 502–506.Google Scholar
  42. Peterson, A.T., J. Soberon & V. Sanchez-Cordero, 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265–1267.Google Scholar
  43. Podos, J., 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin' finches. Nature 409: 185–188.Google Scholar
  44. Prance, G.T. (ed.), 1982. Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Price, T., 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 251–260.Google Scholar
  46. Reznick, D.N. & C.K. Ghalambor, 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112- 113: 183–198.Google Scholar
  47. Reznick, D.N., F.H. Shaw, F.H. Rodd & R.G. Shaw, 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275: 1934–1937.Google Scholar
  48. Rice, R.R. & E.E. Hostert, 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637–1653.Google Scholar
  49. Roy, M., 1997. Recent diversification in African greenbuls (Pycnonotidae: Andropadus) supports a montane speciation model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1337–1344.Google Scholar
  50. Rundle, H.D., L. Nagel, J.W. Boughman & D. Schluter, 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sticklebacks. Science 287: 306–308.Google Scholar
  51. Schluter, D., 1998. Ecological causes of speciation, pp. 114–129 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Schluter, D., 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Schluter, D. & J.N.M. Smith, 1986a. Natural selection on beak and body size in the song sparrow. Evolution 40: 221–231.Google Scholar
  54. Schluter, D. & J.N.M. Smith, 1986b. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in a natural population of song sparrows. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 29: 23–36.Google Scholar
  55. Schneider, C., 2000. Natural Selection and Speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 12398–12399.Google Scholar
  56. Schneider, C.J. & C. Moritz, 1999. Refugial isolation and evolution in Australia' wet tropics rainforest. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266: 191–196.Google Scholar
  57. Schneider, C., T.B. Smith, B. Larison & C. Moritz, 1999. A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: ecological gradients versus rainforest refugia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 13869–13873.Google Scholar
  58. Schneider, C.J., M. Cunningham & C. Moritz, 1998. Comparative phylogeography and the history of vertebrates endemic to the Wet Tropics rainforest of Australia. Mol. Ecol. 7: 487–498.Google Scholar
  59. Shields, G.F. & A.C. Wilson, 1987. Calibration of mitochondrial DNA evolution in geese. J. Mol. Evol. 24: 212–217.Google Scholar
  60. Slabbekoorn, H. & T.B. Smith, 2000. Does bill size polymorphism affect courtship song characteristics in the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 737–753.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, T.B., 1987. Bill size polymorphism and intraspecific niche utilization in an African finch. Nature 329: 717–719.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, T.B., 1990a. Natural selection on bill characters in the two bill morphs of the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus. Evolution 44: 832–842.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, T.B., 1990b. Patterns of morphological and geographic variation in trophic bill morphs of the African finch Pyrenestes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41: 381–414.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, T.B., 1990c. Resource use by bill morphs of an African finch: evidence for intraspecific competition. Ecology 71: 1246–1257.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, T.B., 1991. Inter-and intra-specific diet overlap during lean times between Quelea erythrops and bill morphs of Pyrenestes ostrinus. Oikos 60: 76–82.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, T.B., 1993. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch, Pyrenestes. Nature 363: 618–620.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, T.B., 1997. Adaptive significance of the mega-billed form in the polymophic black-bellied seedcracker Pyrnestes ostrinus. Ibis 139: 382–387.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, T.B. & S. Skulason, 1996. Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fish, amphibians and birds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 111–133.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, T.B. & D. Girman, 2000. Reaching new adaptive peaks: evolution of bill size polymorphism in a African finch, pp. 139–156 in Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild, edited by T. Mousseau, B. Sinervo & J. Endler. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  70. Smith, T.B., R.K. Wayne, D.J. Girman & M.W. Bruford, 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276: 1855–1857.Google Scholar
  71. Stebbins, G.L., 1974. Flowering Plants, Evolution above the Species Level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  72. Thiollay, J.M., 1971. L'avifaune de la region de Lamto. Annales De L'Universite D'Abidjan, Ser. E. Ecologie IV: 1–132.Google Scholar
  73. Turton, S.M. & G. J. Sexton, 1996. Environmental gradients across four rainforest-open forest boundaries in northeastern Queensland. Aust. J. Ecol. 21: 245–254.Google Scholar
  74. Wilson, A.C., R.L. Cann, S.M. Carr, M. George, U.B. Gyllensten, K.M. Helm-Bychowski, R.G. Higuchi, S.R. Palumbi, E.M. Prager, R.D. Sage & M. Stoneking, 1985. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26: 375–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas B. Smith
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher J. Schneider
    • 3
  • Karen Holder
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Tropical Research and Department of BiologySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Population BiologyUniversity of California at DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyGonzaga UniversitySpokaneUSA

Personalised recommendations