Plant Ecology

, Volume 155, Issue 1, pp 47–60

The sensitivity of a species-rich flood-meadow plant community to fertilizer nitrogen: the Lužnice river floodplain, Czech Republic

  • Chris Joyce


Concerns over the relative stability or sensitivity of biologicallydiverse ecosystems in relation to environmental change include the effects ofland-use intensification on diverse plant communities. This paper examines thesensitivity of a floristically diverse flood-meadow under hay-cutting managementto nitrogen enrichment, this being a key component of intensified agriculturalmanagement. A gradient of fertilizer nitrogen treatments was applied to a sitein the Czech Republic in two successive seasons and plant community response wasmonitored using measures of species diversity, cover and above-ground primaryproduction. Results show that diversity was supported by annual hay-cuttingmanagement and that the community was highly sensitive to nitrogen enrichment.Fertilization at rates consistent with intensive agricultural practice reducedspecies richness significantly within eight weeks, with forbs and mossparticularly susceptible. The cover and biomass of some grasses were stimulatedby fertilization until constrained by litter accumulation. Over two seasons,fertilization significantly reduced species diversity and simplified communitystructure as inter-specific competitive relations shifted. Biologically diverseflood-meadows therefore seem to be vulnerable to agricultural intensificationand other human activities that promote enhanced nitrogen levels.

Agricultural intensification Biodiversity Ecological sensitivity Fertilization Floodplain grasslands Grassland management Nitrogen 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bakker J.P. 1989. Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Bignal E.M. and McCracken D.I. 1996. Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 413–424.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbink R. 1991. Effects of nutrient enrichment in Dutch chalk grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology 28: 28–41.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess N.D., Evans C.E. and Thomas G.J. 1990. Vegetation change on the Ouse Washes wetland, England, 1972–88 and effects on their conservation importance. Biological Conservation 53: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodd M., Silvertown J., McConway K., Potts J. and Crawley M. 1995. Community stability: a 60-year record of trends and outbreaks in the Park Grass Experiment. Journal of Ecology 83: 277–285.Google Scholar
  6. FryĆ ek A., Kralovec J. and Prach K. 1992. Long-term fetilizing of grassland: productivity and ecological aspects. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemoslovaca 24: 255–265.Google Scholar
  7. Grant D.A., Luscombe P.C. and Thomas V.J. 1981. Responses of ryegrass, browntop, and an unimproved resident pasture in hill country, to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilisers I. Pasture production. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 9: 227–236.Google Scholar
  8. Grime J.P. 1973. Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Environmental Management 1: 151–167.Google Scholar
  9. Grime J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  10. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  11. Haynes R.J. and Goh K.M. 1978. Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of plants. Biological Review 53: 465–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins A. and Hopkins J.J. 1994. UK grasslands now: agricultural production and nature conservation. In: Haggar R.J. and Peel S. (eds), Grassland management and nature conservation. Occasional Symposium No. 28. British Grassland Society, Reading, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
  13. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 1995. Interaction between agriculture and nature conservation in the Czech and Slovak Republics. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson K.H., Vogt K.A., Clark H.J., Schmitz O.J. and Vogt D.J. 1996. Biodiversity and the productivity and stability of ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 372–377.Google Scholar
  15. Joyce C.B. 1998. Management of European floodplain grasslands for plant biodiversity. (unpublished).Google Scholar
  16. Joyce C.B. and Wade P.M. 1998. Wet grasslands: a European perspective. In: Joyce C.B. and Wade P.M. (eds), European wet grasslands: biodiversity, management and restoration. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Kirkham F.W. and Wilkins R.J. 1994. The productivity and response to inorganic fertilizers of species-rich wetland hay meadows on the Somerset Moors: the effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on herbage production. Grass and Forage Science 49: 163–175.Google Scholar
  18. Knapp A.K. and Seastadt T.R. 1986. Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. BioScience 10: 662–668.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis O.A.M. 1986. Plants and nitrogen. Studies in Biology No.166. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  20. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  21. Mahmoud A. and Grime J.P. 1976. An analysis of competitive ability in three perennial grasses. New Phytologist 77: 431–435.Google Scholar
  22. May R.M. 1973. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  23. McLean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H. and Keeney D.R. (eds), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Soceity of AgronomyInc/Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 199–224.Google Scholar
  24. Morrison J. 1987. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer. In: Snaydon R.W. (ed.), Managed grasslands. Analytical studies. Ecosystems of the World 17B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
  25. Mountford J.O., Lakhani K.H. and Kirkham F.W. 1993. Experimental assessment of the effects of nitrogen addition under hay-cutting and aftermath grazing on the vegetation of meadows on a Somerset peat moor. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 321–332.Google Scholar
  26. Naeem S., Thompson L.J., Lawler S.P., Lawton J.H. and Woodin R.M. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368: 734–736.Google Scholar
  27. Nilsson C. and Grelsson G. 1995. The fragility of ecosystems: a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 677–692.Google Scholar
  28. Oomes M.J.M. and Mooi H. 1981. The effect of cutting and fertilizing on the floristic composition and production of an Arrhenatherion elatioris grassland. Vegetatio 47: 233–239.Google Scholar
  29. Prach K. 1992. Vegetation, microtopography and water table in the LuŽnice River floodplain, South Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Preslia 64: 357–367.Google Scholar
  30. Prach K. 1993. Vegetational changes in a wet meadow complex, South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 28: 1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Prach K., KucĆ era S. and Klimešová J. 1990. Vegetation and land use in the LuŽnice river floodplain and valley in Austria and Czechoslovakia. In: Whigham D.F., Good R.E. and Kvet J. (eds), Wetland ecology and management: case studies. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 117–125.Google Scholar
  32. Rabotnov T.A. 1977. The influence of fertilizers on the plant communities of mesophytic grasslands. In: Krause W. (ed.), Application of vegetation science to grassland husbandry. Junk, the Hague, pp. 461–497.Google Scholar
  33. Rauch O., Large A. and Šmilauer P. 1996. The floodplain as a buffer zone for water quality. In: Prach W., Jenì J. and Large A.R.G. (eds), Floodplain ecology and management. The LuŽnice River in the Třeboň Biosphere Reserve, central Europe. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 201–208.Google Scholar
  34. Risser P.G. 1990. The ecological importance of land-water ecotones. In: Naiman R.J. and Décamps H. (eds), The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, pp. 7–21.Google Scholar
  35. Robson M.J., Parsons A.J. and Williams T.E. 1989. Herbage production: grasses and legumes. In: Holmes W. (ed.), Grass. Its production and utilization. British Grassland Society. 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 7–88.Google Scholar
  36. Rodwell J.S. (ed.) 1992. British plant communities. Grasslands and montane communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Rychnovská M. 1993. Temperate semi-natural grasslands of Eurasia. In: Coupland R.T. (ed.), Natural grasslands. Ecosystems of the world 8B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 125–166.Google Scholar
  38. Rychnovská M., BlaŽková D. and Hrabé F. 1994. Conservation and development of floristically diverse grasslands in central Europe. In: 't Mannetje L. and Frame J. (eds), Grassland and society. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
  39. Schulze E.D. and Mooney H.A. (eds) 1993. Biodiversity and ecosytem function. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Smith R.S., Buckingham H., Bullard M.J., Shiel R.S. and Younger A. 1996. The conservation management of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in northern England. Grass and Forage Science 51: 278–291.Google Scholar
  41. Straškrabová J. and Prach K. 1998. Five years of restoration of alluvial meadows-a case study from Central Europe. In: Joyce C.B. and Wade P.M. (eds), European wet grasslands: biodiversity, management and restoration. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 295–303.Google Scholar
  42. Tilman D. 1987. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecological Monographs 57: 189–214.Google Scholar
  43. Tilman D. 1993. Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation? Ecology 74: 2179–2191.Google Scholar
  44. Tilman D. 1996. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77: 350–363.Google Scholar
  45. Tilman D., Wedin D. and Knops J. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379: 718–720.Google Scholar
  46. Traczyk T., Traczyk H. and Pasternak D. 1976. The influence of intensive mineral fertilization on the yield and floral composition of meadows. Polish Ecological Studies 2: 39–47.Google Scholar
  47. Traczyk T., Traczyk H. and Pasternak-Kuś mierska D. 1984. Reaction of meadow vegetation after seven years of intensive inorganic fertilization. Ekologia Polska 4: 581–596.Google Scholar
  48. Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.D., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M. et al. 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. Volumes 1–5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  49. van der Meer H.G. 1982. Effective use of nitrogen on grassland farms. In: Corall A.J. (ed.), Efficient grassland farming. Occasional Symposium No.14. British Grassland Society, Reading, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
  50. van Dijk G. 1991. The status of semi-natural grasslands in Europe. In: Goriup P.D., Batten L.A. and Norton J.A. (eds), The conservation of lowland dry grassland birds in Europe. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
  51. van Hecke P., Impens I. and Behaeghe T.J. 1981. Temporal variation of species composition and species diversity in permanent grassland plots with different fertilizer treatments. Vegetatio 47: 221–232.Google Scholar
  52. Willems J.H., Peet R.K. and Bik L. 1993. Changes in chalk-grassland structure and species richness resulting from selective nutrient additions. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 203–212.Google Scholar
  53. Xiong S. and Nilsson C. 1997. Dynamics of leaf litter accumulation and its effects on riparian vegetation. The Botanical Review 63: 240–264.Google Scholar
  54. Zar J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Joyce
    • 1
  1. 1.School of the EnvironmentUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations