, Volume 460, Issue 1–3, pp 195–212 | Cite as

Modeling studies of the effect of climate variability on MSX disease in eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations

  • Eileen Hofmann
  • Susan Ford
  • Eric Powell
  • John Klinck


Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) often undergo epizootics of MSX (Multinucleated Spore Unknown) disease, which is caused by the protozoan pathogen, Haplosporidium nelsoni. The disease has been present in oyster populations in the mid-Atlantic United States since the 1950s. During the 1980s and 1990s, it became established further north along the east coast of the United States. To investigate the factors underlying the northward progression of MSX disease, a model that simulates the host–parasite–environmental interactions was used. The model is physiologically-based and is structured around the transmission, proliferation and death rates of the parasite. Environmental conditions of temperature, salinity and oyster food supply provide the external forcing that results in variations in the biological rates. For this study, environmental data sets, both average and extreme, were obtained at a site in upper Chesapeake Bay for 1986 through 1995. This site is in the middle of one of the most productive oyster growing regions on the east coast of the United States; thus, both short- and long-term changes in the environment measured here realistically reflect conditions experienced by important oyster populations. The effect of short-term high-salinity (drought) or low-salinity (wet) conditions on MSX disease prevalence and intensity was relatively small because the average salinity regime already favors maximum parasite activity at this site. Even the extreme low salinity events were not low enough to significantly inhibit the parasite. Similarly, simulations using short-term high-temperature extremes for the same site showed only minor deviations from the average pattern because average temperatures were already high enough to support parasite development. In contrast, the measured low temperature conditions, applied for a single year, caused a dramatic reduction in parasite activity, which extended over a 2-year period. Additional simulations show that overall food supply to the host is of little consequence in determining the basic disease pattern; however, the timing of maximum food supply provided to the host, relative to specific times in the parasite life cycle, is important in determining whether or not the parasite attempts sporulation or undergoes density-independent growth. Simulations that test a sequence of changing environmental conditions show that when a year with cold winter temperatures (less than 3 °C) is followed by a year of low salinity (less than 15 ppt), prevalences and intensities of MSX disease are greatly reduced, with the disease becoming almost absent in the oyster populations; however, the disease returns when average environmental conditions return. Simulations using progressive cooling or warming conditions indicate that winter temperatures consistently lower than 3 °C limit the long-term development of MSX disease. These simulations support the suggestion that climate warming is a contributing factor to the northward spread of MSX disease.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews, J. D., 1964. Oyster mortality studies in Virginia. IV. MSX in James River public seed beds. Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Ass. 53: 65–84.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, J. D., 1983. Minchinia nelsoni (MSX) infections in the James River seed-oyster area and their expulsion in spring. Estuar. coast. shelf Sci. 16: 255–269.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, J. D. & J. L. Wood, 1967. Oyster mortality studies in Virginia. VI. History and distribution of Minchinia nelsoni, a pathogen of oysters, in Virginia. Chesapeake Sci. 8: 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, R. D. & S. E. Ford, 1992. Occurrence and significance of ingested haplosporidan spores in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791). J. Shellfish Res. 11: 371–375.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. J., R. R. Langan & T. L. Howell, 1997. Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) epizootic in the Piscataqua River Estuary (Maine/New Hampshire, U.S.A.). J. Parasitol. 83: 148–150.Google Scholar
  6. Bobo, M. Y., D. Richardson, T. C. Cheng, E. McGovern & L. Coen, 1996. Season cycle of Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) in intertidal oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in South Carikuba. J. Shellfish Res. 15: 525.Google Scholar
  7. Burreson, E. M. & L. M. Ragone Calvo, 1996. Epizootiology of Perkinsus marinus disease of oysters in Chesapeake Bay, with emphasis on data since 1985. J. Shellfish Res. 15: 17–34.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, T.,M. Folli, J. Klinck, S. Ford & J. Miller, 1998. The relationship between increasing sea surface temperature and the northward spread of Perkinsus marinus (Dermo) disease epizootics in oysters. Estuar. coast. shelf Sci. 40: 587–597.Google Scholar
  9. Easterling, D. R., B. Horton, P. D. Jones, T. C. Peterson, T. R. Karl, D. E. Parker, M. J. Salinger, V. Razuvayev, N. Plummer, P. Jamason & C. K. Folland, 1997. Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science 277: 364–367.Google Scholar
  10. Farley, C. A., 1968. Minchinia nelsoni (Haplosporida) disease syndrome in the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. J. Protozool. 15: 585–599.Google Scholar
  11. Farley, C. A., 1975. Epizootic and enzootic aspects of Minchinia nelsoni (Haplosporida) disease inMaryland oysters. J. Protozool. 22: 418–427.Google Scholar
  12. Ford, S. E., 1985. Effects of salinity on survival of theMSX parasite Haplosporidium nelsoni (Haskin, Stauber & Mackin) in oysters. J. Shellfish Res. 2: 85–90.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, S. E., 1996. Range extension by the oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus into the northeastern U.S.: response to climate change? J. Shellfish Res. 15: 45–56.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, S. E. & H. H. Haskin, 1982. History and epizootiology of Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX), an oyster pathogen, in Delaware Bay, 1957–1980. J. Invertebrate Pathol. 40: 118–141.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, S. E. & H. H. Haskin, 1987. Infection and mortality patterns in strains of oysters Crassostrea virginica selected for resistance to the parasite Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX). J. Parasitol. 73: 368–376.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, S. E. & H. H. Haskin, 1988. Comparison of in vitro salinity tolerance of the oyster parasite Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) and hemocytes from the host, Crassostrea virginica. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 90: 183–187.Google Scholar
  17. Ford, S. E. and S. A. Kanaley, 1988. An evaluation of hemolymph diagnosis for detection of the oyster parasite Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX). J. Shellfish Res. 7: 11–18.Google Scholar
  18. Ford, S. E., E. N. Powell, J. M. Klinck & E. E. Hofmann, 1999. Modeling the MSX parasite in Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations. I. Model development, implementation and verification. J. Shellfish Res. 18: 475–500.Google Scholar
  19. Ford, S. E. & M. R. Tripp, 1996. Diseases and defense mechanisms. In Newell, R. I. E., V. S. Kennedy & A. F. Eble (eds), The Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant College: 383–450.Google Scholar
  20. Haskin, H. H. & J. D. Andrews, 1988. Uncertainties and speculations about the life cycle of the eastern oyster pathogen Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX). In Fisher, W. S. (ed.), Disease Processes in Marine Bivalve Molluscs. Spec. Pub. 18, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD: 5–22.Google Scholar
  21. Haskin, H. H. & S. E. Ford, 1982. Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) on Delaware Bay seed oyster beds: a host–parasite relationship along a salinity gradient. J. Invert. Pathol. 40: 388–405.Google Scholar
  22. Hofmann, E. E., E. N. Powell, J. M. Klinck & E. A. Wilson, 1992. Modeling oyster populations III. Critical feeding periods, growth and reproduction. J. Shellfish Res. 11: 399–416.Google Scholar
  23. Kern, F. G., 1988. Recent changes in the range of ‘MSX’ Haplosporidium nelsoni. J. Shellfish Res. 7: 543.Google Scholar
  24. Krantz, E. L., L. R. Buchanan, C. A. Farley & A. H. Carr, 1972. Minchinia nelsoni in oysters from Massachusetts waters. Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Ass. 62: 83–88.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, E. J., F. G. Kern, A. Rosenfield, S. A. Stevens, R. L. Walker & P. B. Heffernan, 1992. Lethal parasites in oysters from coastal Georgia, with discussion of disease and management implications. U.S. Nat.Mar. Fish. Ser. mar. Fish. Rev. 52(2): 1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Paraso, M. C., S. E. Ford, E. N. Powell, E. E. Hofmann & J. M. Klinck, 1999. Modeling the MSX parasite in Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations. II. salinity effects. J. Shellfish Res. 18: 501–516.Google Scholar
  27. Powell, E. N., E. E. Hofmann & J. M. Klinck, 1996. Modeling diseased oyster populations II. Triggering mechanisms for Perkinsus marinus epizootics. J. Shellfish Res. 15: 141–165.Google Scholar
  28. Powell, E. N., J. M. Klinck, S. E. Ford, E. E. Hofmann & S.J. Jordan, 1999. Modeling the MSX parasite in eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations. III. regional application and the problem of transmission. J. Shellfish Res. 18: 517–537.Google Scholar
  29. Powell, E. N., J. M. Klinck., E. E. Hofmann & S. E. Ford, 1997. Varying the timing of oyster transplant: implications for management from simulation studies. Fish. Oceanogr. 6: 213–237.Google Scholar
  30. Soniat, T. M., E. N. Powell, E. E. Hofmann & J. M. Klinck, 1998. Understanding the success and failure of oyster populations: the importance of sampled variables and sample timing. J. Shellfish Res. 17: 1149–1165.Google Scholar
  31. Sprague, V., E. A. Dunnington & E. Drobeck, 1969. Decrease in incidence of Minchinia nelsoni in oysters accompanying reduction of salinity in the laboratory. Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Ass. 59: 23–26.Google Scholar
  32. Sunila, I., J. Karolus & J. Volk, 1999. A new epizootic of Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX), a Haplosporidian oyster parasite, in Long Island Sound, Connecticut. J. Shellfish Res. 18: 169–174.Google Scholar
  33. Verwer, J. G. & M. Van Loon, 1994. An evaluation of explicit pseudo-steady-state approximation schemes for stiff ODE systems from chemical kinetics. J. Comp. Phys. 113: 347–352.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eileen Hofmann
    • 1
  • Susan Ford
    • 2
  • Eric Powell
    • 2
  • John Klinck
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Coastal Physical OceanographyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkU.S.A.
  2. 2.Haskin Shellfish Research LaboratoryRutgers UniversityPort NorrisU.S.A

Personalised recommendations