Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 12, pp 2045–2076 | Cite as

The biogeography of the Anura of sub-equatorial Africa and the prioritisation of areas for their conservation

  • C.L. Seymour
  • H.M. De Klerk
  • A. Channing
  • T.M. Crowe
Article

Abstract

There is an increasing need for protected areas to conserve biodiversity efficiently. The Anura of sub-equatorial Africa have received little attention, but we quantitatively analyse a database containing presence-only data for anurans of sub-equatorial Africa to determine patterns of distribution and species richness, and discuss the roles of present and past environmental conditions in shaping these patterns. We consider the distribution of areas rich in endemic, range-restricted and Red Data Book (RDB) species to identify areas of significance to conservation. The Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe and adjacent area in Mozambique, southeastern Malawi and the northern coast of KwaZulu/Natal are particularly species rich, whereas the southwestern Cape of South Africa and northwestern Zambia exhibit high degrees of endemism. Four major biogeographical sub-regions are identified, which can be further subdivided into provinces. All statistically significant, current environmental factors together account for 52.6% of species richness. Annual maximum rainfall, soil type variation, minimum temperature and range of elevation were all positively correlated with species richness. Thus, both habitat influences and history appear to have influenced patterns of anuran richness in the region. Generally, areas of high species richness coincide with those high in range-restricted, endemic and RDB species. In South Africa, the northeastern coast and southwestern Cape are hypothesised to have been both refugia and centres of speciation. Results suggest that the current reserve system in sub-equatorial Africa is inadequate for the conservation of the full complement of anuran species in the region.

amphibian distribution patterns endemism environmental correlates protected areas species richness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander WJR (1985) Hydrology of low latitude Southern Hemisphere land masses. Hydrobiologia 125: 75–83Google Scholar
  2. Blaustein AR and Wake DB (1995) The puzzle of declining amphibian populations. Scientific American 272: 52–57Google Scholar
  3. Blaustein AR, Keisecker JM and Walls SC (1996) Field experiments, amphibian mortality, and UV radiation. BioScience 46: 386–388Google Scholar
  4. Branch WR (1988) South African Red Data Book-Reptiles and Amphibians. South African Natural Scientific Progress Report No. 151. CSIR, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray JR and Curtis JC (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–449Google Scholar
  6. Channing A and Griffin M (1993) An annotated checklist of the frogs of Namibia. Madoqua 18: 101–116Google Scholar
  7. Channing A and Van Dijk DE (1995) Amphibia. In: Cowan GI (ed) Wetlands of South Africa, pp 193–206. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Pretoria. CTP Book Printers (Pty.), ParowGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowe TM (1990) A quantitative analysis of patterns of distribution, species richness and endemism in southern African vertebrates. In: Peters G and Hutterer R (eds) Vertebrates in the Tropics. pp 145–160. Museum Alexander Koenig, BonnGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowe TM and Crowe AA (1982) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism in Afrotropical birds. Journal of Zoology 198: 417–442Google Scholar
  10. Davies B and Day J (1998) Vanishing Waters. University of Cape Town Press, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa, 487 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies BR, O'Keefe JH and Snaddon CD (1995) River and stream ecosystems in southern Africa: predictably unpredictable. In: Cushing CE, Cummins KW and Minsall GW (eds) Ecosystems of theWorld: River and Stream Ecosystems, pp 537–599. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis DHS (1962) Distribution patterns of southern African Muridae, with notes on some of their fossil antecedents. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museum 2: 56–76Google Scholar
  13. Department of Environment Affairs (1994a) ENPAT (Environmental Potential Atlas): User's Reference, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Department of Environment Affairs (1994b) ENPAT (Environmental Potential Atlas): National Database Guide, 24 pp 2075Google Scholar
  15. Dixon WJ (1990) BMDP Statistical Software. California University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  16. Drinkrow DR and Cherry MI (1995) Anuran distribution, diversity, and conservation in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African Journal of Zoology 30(3): 82–90Google Scholar
  17. Frances RL and Welbourn PM (1992) Influence of lake pH and macrograzers on the distribution and abundance of nuisance metaphytic algae in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 185–195Google Scholar
  18. Frost DR (1985) Amphibian Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Allen Press and the Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas 732 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Götmark F, Ahlund M and Eriksson MOG (1986) Are indices reliable for assessing conservation value for natural areas? An avian case study. Biological Conservation 38: 55–73Google Scholar
  20. Guillet A and Crowe TM (1985) Patterns of distribution, species richness, endemism and guild composition of water-birds in Africa. African Journal of Ecology 23: 89–120Google Scholar
  21. Guillet A and Crowe TM (1986) A preliminary investigation of patterns of distribution and species richness of southern African waterbirds. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 16(3): 65–81Google Scholar
  22. Haffer J (1969) Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165: 131–137Google Scholar
  23. Jackson SP (1961) Climatological Atlas of Africa. Government Printer, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  24. Kershaw M, Williams PH and Mace GM (1994) Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 354–372Google Scholar
  25. Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127–134Google Scholar
  26. Licht LE (1996) Amphibian decline still a puzzle. BioScience 46: 172–173Google Scholar
  27. Margules CR (1989) Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation. Biological Conservation 50: 1–11Google Scholar
  28. Margules CR and Usher MB (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 21: 79–109Google Scholar
  29. Margules CR, Nicholls AO and Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43: 63–76Google Scholar
  30. Muriuki JN, deKlerk HM, Williams PH, Bennun LA, Crowe TM and van den Berge E (1997) Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritise areas for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 191–210Google Scholar
  31. Nelson G and Platnick NI (1981) Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York, 567 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker C (1982) The western Cape lowland fynbos. What is there left to Conserve? Veld and Flora 68: 98–101Google Scholar
  33. Passmore NI and Carruthers VC (1995) South African Frogs. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, 322 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips K (1990) Where have all the frogs and toads gone? BioScience 40: 422–424Google Scholar
  35. Picker MD (1985) Hybridization and habitat selection in Xenopus gilli and Xenopus laevis in the southwestern Cape province. Copeia 3: 574–580Google Scholar
  36. Poynton JC (1964) The Amphibia of southern Africa: a faunal study. Annals of the Natal Museum 17: 1–334Google Scholar
  37. Poynton JC and Broadley DG (1978) The herpetofauna. In: Werger MJA (ed) Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa, pp 925–948. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  38. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC and Gibbons DW (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diverstiy hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337Google Scholar
  39. Pressey RC (1994) Ad Hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conservation Biology 8(3): 662–668Google Scholar
  40. Pressey RC, Johnson IR and Wilson PD (1994) Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 242–262Google Scholar
  41. Rebelo AG (1994) Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. Strelitzia 1: 231–257Google Scholar
  42. Rebelo AG and Siegfried WR (1992) Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape floristic region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biology 6(2): 243–252Google Scholar
  43. Rebelo AG and Siegfried WR (1990) Protection of fynbos vegetation: ideal and real world options. Biological Conservation 54: 15–31Google Scholar
  44. Savage JM (1973) The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, 470 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Stewart MM (1967) Amphibians of Malawi. State University of New York Press, New York, 179 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Stuckenburg BR (1969) Effective temperature as an ecological factor in southern Africa. Zoologica Africana 4(2): 145–197Google Scholar
  47. Thomas CD and Mallorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas mountains in Morrocco. Biological Conservation 33: 95–117Google Scholar
  48. Turpie JK and Crowe TM (1994) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism of larger African mammals. South African Journal of Zoology 29(1): 19–32Google Scholar
  49. Van Dijk DE (1966) Systematic and field keys to the families, genera and described species of South African anuran tadpoles. Annals of the Natal Museum 18: 231–286Google Scholar
  50. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ and Williams PH (1991) What to protect?-systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235–254Google Scholar
  51. Wake DB and Morowitz HJ (1991) Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon? Findings and recommendations. Alytes 9(2): 33–42Google Scholar
  52. White F (1981a) Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  53. White F (1981b) The Vegetation of Africa: A Descriptive Memoir to Accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/ UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams PH (1993) Using WORLDMAP: Priority Areas for Biodiversity, Version 3.06. The Natural History Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson EO (1985) The biological diversity crisis: a challenge to science. Issues in Science and Technology 2: 20–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.L. Seymour
    • 1
  • H.M. De Klerk
    • 1
  • A. Channing
    • 2
  • T.M. Crowe
    • 3
  1. 1.Percy FitzPatrick InstituteUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of the Western CapeCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Percy FitzPatrick InstituteUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations