Research in Science Education

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 289–307 | Cite as

Documenting Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through PaP-eRs

  • John Loughran
  • Philippa Milroy
  • Amanda Berry
  • Richard Gunstone
  • Pamela Mulhall
Article

Abstract

This paper examines science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and ways in which that knowledge might be captured, articulated and portrayed to others. The research from which this paper is drawn has involved interviews with experienced science teachers in an attempt to make the tacit nature of their practice explicit. Initially, case methodology was envisaged as being a way of documenting these teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. However, over time, the form of knowledge and information that we were gathering and attempting to portray extended beyond that which could reasonably be described as being case-based. Hence we have developed an approach to articulation and portrayal based on what we call the CoRe (Content Representation) – which represents the particular content/topic of the science teaching – and PaP-eRs (Pedagogical and Professional experience Repertoire) – which help to illuminate specific aspects of the CoRe and therefore offer insights into pedagogical content knowledge itself. The results of this study offer new ways of conceptualising what pedagogical content knowledge is and how it might be captured, documented and disseminated.

pedagogical content knowledge science teachers' professional knowledge science teaching and learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (1999). Researching formative assessment. In J. J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fox, D. (1997). What will I do with all these questions? In I. J. Mitchell, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Stories of reflective teaching: A book of PEEL cases. Melbourne: PEEL Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91.Google Scholar
  4. Ingvarson, L. C., Livingston, J., Loughran, J. J., & Haslam, F. (1995). Teaching science: Getting down to cases. A Monash University and Science Teachers' Association of Victoria project for the Department of Employment, Education and Training. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.Google Scholar
  5. Kadar, P. (1988). Triggers for reflection. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Faculty of Education, Monash University.Google Scholar
  6. Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.Google Scholar
  7. Loughran, J. J., & Corrigan, D. J. (1991). Do you know your body: An assessment task. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 37(4), 44-48.Google Scholar
  8. Loughran, J. J., Gunstone, R. F., Berry, A., Milroy, P., & Mulhall, P. (2000, April). Science cases in action: Developing an understanding of science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  9. Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. R. (1996). Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mitchell, I. J., & Mitchell, J. (1997). Stories of reflective teaching: A book of PEEL cases. Melbourne: PEEL Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Milroy, P., & Mulhall, P. (2000). Sharing science teachers' professional know-how. Lab Talk, 44(1), 7-10.Google Scholar
  12. Mulhall, P., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Loughran, J. (2000, June). Enhancing understanding of science pedagogical content knowledge for teachers and researchers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Fremantle, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Teaching and learning as everyday activity. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 169-181), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Acad. Publ.Google Scholar
  14. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Shulman, J. H. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.Google Scholar
  18. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.Google Scholar
  19. van Driel, J, H., Verloop, N, & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Loughran
    • 1
  • Philippa Milroy
    • 1
  • Amanda Berry
    • 1
  • Richard Gunstone
    • 1
  • Pamela Mulhall
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations