Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 237–251 | Cite as

Spatial Patterns of Soil Moisture as Affected by Shrubs, in Different Climatic Conditions

  • Sarah Pariente

Abstract

At three study sites, representing Mediterranean, semi-aridand mildly-arid climatic conditions, the effect of shrubs onthe spatial patterns of soil moisture was studied. At eachsite soil moisture was measured, on hillslopes, at thevicinity of 8 shrubs. For each shrub the measurements havebeen taken at 3 microenvironments, i.e. under the shrub (US),at the margins of shrub (MS) and between shrubs (BS). At themicroenvironments US and MS the measurements were taken at 3 directions: upslope, downslope and sideslope of the shrubs. At all sampling points soil samples were taken from 3 depths: 0–2, 2–5 and 5–10 cm. In addition, rock fragments cover percentage near the shrubs was determined. A soil moisture pattern was found, around each shrub,which is composed of a radial gradient and a downslope gradient. The radial gradient is expressed by soil moisture decreasingfrom the US microenvironment, in all directions, through the MS towards the BS microenvironment. The US microenvironmenthas a `spatial advantage' of higher soil moisture content dueto (1) relatively higher infiltration rate, (2) capture overlandflow from the BS area upslope that shrub and (3) low evaporationrate because of the shading effect.The downslope gradient is expressed by decreasing soil moisturefrom the upslope direction of each shrub (MS and US microenvironments) towards the downslope direction of that shrub (MS and US microenvironments, respectively). Thisgradient is controlled by the relatively high content of rockfragments near the shrubs at their upslope direction. Suchrock fragments spatial distribution is attributed to (1) thedetachment and transport of rock fragments by sheep and goatstrampling and (2) the effect of shrub on the continuity ofoverland flow and sediment transport. The effect of rockfragments is similar to that of shrubs regarding increasinginfiltration and decreasing evaporation rate. The relativelyhigh soil moisture at the upslope direction of each shrubenhances annuals growth producing a positive feedback loop:soil moisture – annuals growth – trampling. This sequencemaintains the typical rock fragments spatial organization andcontributes to the sustainability of the grazing system.At all the study sites at the US microenvironment there isa trend of decreasing soil moisture with increasing soildepth. At microenvironments MS and BS soil moisture increaseswith soil depth.The results are of great relevance for rehabilitationstrategies as they suggest that in order to combatdesertification in degraded semi-arid and mildly-arid areas,where the main land use is grazing, both shrubs and rockfragment should be kept at their present spatial distribution.

climatic regions rock fragments shrub soil moisture spatial patterns 

References

  1. Baver, L. D., Gardner,W. H. and Gardner, W. R.: 1972, Soil Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Belsky, A.J., Amundson, R. G., Duxburg, J. M., Riha, S. J., Ali, A. R. and Mwonga, S. M.: 1989, ‘The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environments in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya’, J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 1005–1024.Google Scholar
  3. Bochet, E., Rubio, J. L. and Poesen, J.:1999, ‘Soil stability islands within a Mediterranean patchy vegetation’, Catena 38, 23–44.Google Scholar
  4. Brakensiek, D. L. and Rawls,W. J.:1994, ‘Soil Containing Rock Fragments: Effects on Infiltration’, in J. Poesen and H. Lavee (eds.), Rock Fragments in Soil: Surface Dynamics, Catena 23, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, D. B.: 1955, ‘Multiple range and multiple F-test’, Biometric 11, 1–42.Google Scholar
  6. Govers, G. and Poesen, J.: 1998, ‘Field experiments on the transport of rock fragments by animal trampling on scree slopes’, Geomorph. 23(2–4), 193–203.Google Scholar
  7. Hemming, C. F.: 1965, Vegetation acts in Somaliland, J. Ecol. 53, 57–67.Google Scholar
  8. Hennessy, J. T., Gibens, R. P., Tromble, J. M. and Cardenas, M.: 1985, Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) dunes and interdunes in southern New Mexico: a study of soil properties and soil water relations, J. Arid Environ. 9, 27–38.Google Scholar
  9. Imeson, A. C.: 1995, ‘The Physical, Chemical andBiological Degradation of the Soil’, in R. Fantechi, D. Peter, P. Balabanis and J. L. Rubio (eds.), Desertification in a European Context: Physical and Socio-Economic Aspects, CEE, Luxembourg. Proceedings of the European School of Climatology and Natural Hazards Course, Pueblo Acantilado, Alicante, Spain, 6–13th October 1993, pp. 153–169.Google Scholar
  10. Lavee, H., Wieder, M. and Pariente, S.: 1989,‘Pedogenic indicators of subsurface flow on Judean Desert hillslopes’, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 14, 545–555.Google Scholar
  11. Lavee, H. and Poesen, J.: 1991, ‘Overland flow generation and continuity on stone-covered soil surfaces’, Hydrol. Process. 5, 345–360.Google Scholar
  12. Lavee, H., Sarah, P. and Imeson, A. C.: 1996, ‘Aggregate stability dynamics as affected by soil temperature and moisture regimes’,Geografiska annaler 78A, 73–82.Google Scholar
  13. Lavee, H., Sarah, P. and Perevolotsky, A.: 1997, ‘The effect of traditional grazing on eco-geomorphic properties in semi-arid areas in Israel’, Fourth Inter. Conf. Geomorph., Bologna Italy, Abstracts, p. 243.Google Scholar
  14. Lavee, H., Imeson, A.C. and Sarah, P.: 1998, ‘The impact of climate change on geomorphology and desertification along a Mediterranean-arid transect’, Land Degrad. Develop. 9, 407–422.Google Scholar
  15. Poesen, J.: 1986, ‘Surface sealing as influenced by slope angle and position of simulated stones inthe top layer of loose sediments’, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 11, 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Poesen, J. and Lavee, H.: 1991, ‘Effects of sizeand incorporation of synthetic mulch on runoff and sediment yield from interrills in a laboratory study with simulated rainfall’, Soil Tillage Res. 21, 209–223.Google Scholar
  17. Poesen, J. and Lavee, H.: 1994, ‘Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes’, Catena 23, 1–28.Google Scholar
  18. Poesen, J., Ingelmo-Sanchez, F. and Mucher, H.: 1990, ‘The Hydrological response of soil surfaces to rainfall as affected by cover andposition of rock fragments in the top layer’, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 15, 653–671.Google Scholar
  19. Puigdefabregas, J. and Sanchez, G.:1996, ‘Geomorphological Implications of Vegetation Patchiness on Semi-Arid Slopes’, in M. G. Anderson and S. M. Brooks (eds.), Advances in Hillslope Processes, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 1027–1060.Google Scholar
  20. Sarah, P.: 1999, ‘Temporal andspatial variability of pedo-geomorphic processes as a response to changing climatic conditions along a topo-climatic transect between the Judean Mountains and the Dead Sea’, Ph.D. Thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Israel (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  21. Sanchez, G. and Puigdefabregas, J.: 1994,‘Interactions of plant growth and sediment movement on slopes in semi-arid environment’, Geomorph. 9, 243–260.Google Scholar
  22. Sarig, S. and Steinberger, Y.: 1993, ‘Immediate effect of wetting event on microbial biomes and carbohydrate production-mediated aggregation in desert soil’, Geoderma 56, 599–607.Google Scholar
  23. Schaefer, R.: 1973, ‘Microbial Activity Under Seasonal Conditions of Drought in MediterraneanClimates’, in Francesco di Castri and M. A. Harold (eds.), Mediterranean Type Ecosystems, Origin and Structure, Ecological Studies 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
  24. Schlesinger, W. H., Reynolds, J. F., Cunningham, G. L., Huenneke, L. F., Jarrell, W. M., Virginia, R. A. and Whitford, W. G.: 1990, ‘Biological feedbacks in global desertification’, Science 247, 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  25. Thornes, J. B.: 1980, ‘Erosional Processes of Running Water and their Spatial and Temporal Controls: A Theoretical Viewpoint’, in M.J. Kirkby and R. P. Morgan (eds.), Soil Erosion, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 129–182.Google Scholar
  26. Valentin, C.: 1994, ‘SurfaceSealing as Affected by Various Rock Fragment Covers in West Africa’, in J. Poesen and H. Lavee (eds.), Rock Fragments in Soil: Surface Dynamics, Catena 23, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
  27. Yair, A. and Lavee, H.: 1976, ‘Runoff generative process and runoff yield from arid talus mantlesslopes’, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 1, 235–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Pariente
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations