Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 109, Issue 3–4, pp 371–394 | Cite as

Does the Wage Tax System Cause Budget Deficits A Macro-Economic Experiment

  • Arno Riedl
  • Frans van Winden
Article

Abstract

In this paper we investigate experimentallythe economic functioning of a wage taxsystem for financing unemployment benefits in aninternational economy, in particular inreaction to budget deficits and taxadjustment. Our results support the hypothesisthat due to out-of-equilibrium priceuncertainty producers are reluctant toemploy inputs. We also observe a downward pressureon wages exacerbated by an over-supply of labor by consumers. Theseobservations can explain the budgetdeficits found. Furthermore, we find that taxadjustments in order to facilitate abalancing of the budget has strong adverse effects onunemployment and real GDP.

Keywords

Adverse Effect Economic Functioning Public Finance Budget Deficit Unemployment Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1995). The political economy of budget deficits. IMF Staff Papers 42: 1-31.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R.J. (1989). The Ricardian approach to budget deficits.Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 37-54.Google Scholar
  3. Batra, R.N. and Ullah, A. (1974). Competitive firm and the theory of input demand under price uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy 82: 537-548.Google Scholar
  4. Bernheim, D.B. (1989). A neoclassical perspective on budget deficits.Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 55-72.Google Scholar
  5. Brockhaus, Sr. R.H. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton and K.H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (1994). Growth, competitiveness, employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st Century. White Paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  8. Graafland, J.J. and de Mooij, R.A. (1994). Analyzing fiscal policy in the Netherlands: Simulations with a revised MIMIC. Research Memorandum 140. Central Planning Bureau, The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. Gunjal, K. and Legault, B. (1995). Risk preferences of dairy and hog producers in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Agricultural-Economics 43: 23-35.Google Scholar
  10. Hartman, R. (1975). Competitive firm and the theory of input demand under price uncertainty: Comment. Journal of Political Economy 83: 1289-1290.Google Scholar
  11. Hartman, R. (1976). Factor demand with output price uncertainty. American Economic Review 66: 675-681.Google Scholar
  12. Holthausen, D.M. (1976). Input choices and uncertain demand. American Economic Review 66: 94-103.Google Scholar
  13. Newey, W.K. and West, K.D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703-708.Google Scholar
  14. Noussair, C.N., Plott, C.R. and Riezman, R.G. (1995). An experimental investigation of the patterns of international trade. American Economic Review 85: 462-491.Google Scholar
  15. Plott, C.R. and Gray, P. (1990). The multiple unit double auction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13: 245-258.Google Scholar
  16. Riedl, A. and van Winden, F. (2000). An experimental investigation of wage taxation and unemployment in a closed and an international economy. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2000-112/1. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Sø renson, P.B. (1997). Public finance solutions to the European unemployment problem?. Economic Policy: A European Forum 25: 221-251.Google Scholar
  18. Velthoven, van, B., Verbon, H.A.A. and Winden, van, F.A.A.M(1993). The political economy of government debt: A survey. In H.A.A. Verbon and F.A.A.M van Winden (Eds.), The political economy of government debt. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Winden, van, F.A.A.M., Riedl, A., Wit, J. and Dijk, van, F. (1999). Experimenteel onderzoek naar het plan van Elswijk: Eindrapport voor het Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. CREED. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Yellen, J.L. (1989). Symposium on the budget deficit. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 17-21.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, G. (1998). Ownership concentration, risk aversion, and the effect of financial structure on investment decision. European Economic Review 42: 1751-1778.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arno Riedl
    • 1
  • Frans van Winden
    • 1
  1. 1.CREED, Department of EconomicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations