Sex Roles

, Volume 45, Issue 1–2, pp 67–88 | Cite as

Development of Gender Differences in Children's Responses to Animated Entertainment

  • Mary Beth Oliver
  • Stephen Green


This study examined gender differences in children's responses to animated scenes from an action adventure versus a sad film, and to animated previews of a prototypical “male” versus “female” movie. Females were more likely than males to express sadness in response to the sad scene, and gender differences in intensities of sadness increased with age. Children were much more likely to stereotype the “male” preview as most liked by other boys, whereas the majority of children perceived the “female” preview as liked by either gender equally. In terms of enjoyment of the “male” and “female” previews, gender differences in enjoyment of the “male” preview were apparent only among children who perceived the film as more appealing to boys, and gender differences in enjoyment of the “female” preview were apparent only among children who perceived the film as more appealing to girls. Implications for children's programming are discussed.


Gender Difference Social Psychology Examine Gender Difference Action Adventure Study Examine Gender Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ang, I. (1990). Melodramatic identifications: Television fiction and women's fantasy. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Television and women's culture: The politics of the popular (pp. 75-88). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, P. (2000, August 21). Fox Family ditches Boyz and Girlz. Variety, 380, 33.Google Scholar
  3. Beuf, A. (1974). Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication, 24, 142-145.Google Scholar
  4. Birnbaum, D. W., Nosanchuk, T. A., & Croll, W. L. (1980). Children's stereotypes about sex differences in emotionality. Sex Roles, 6, 435-443.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, D. C., Graczyk, B., & Blanchard, R. J. (1986). Differential reactions of men and women to realism, physical damage, and emotionality in violent films. Aggressive Behavior, 12, 45-55.Google Scholar
  6. Block, J. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512-526.Google Scholar
  7. Block, J. H. (1978). Another look at sex differentiation in the socialization behaviors of mothers and fathers. In J. Sherman & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), The psychology of women: Future directions of research. New York: Psychological Dimensions.Google Scholar
  8. Brannon, R., & David, D. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood, and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Briton, N., & Hall, J. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79-90.Google Scholar
  10. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 338-349). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Broverman, I., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.Google Scholar
  12. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 4, 676-713.Google Scholar
  13. Cantor, J. (1996). Television and children's fear. In T. M. MacBeth (Ed.), Tuning in to young viewers: Social science perspectives on television (pp. 87-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Cantor, J., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Predictors of children's interest in violent television program. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 155-167.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the social and behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Collins-Standley, T., Gan, S., Yu, H. J., & Zillmann, D. (1996). Choice of romantic, violent, and scary fairy-tale books by preschool girls and boys. Child Study Journal, 26, 279-302.Google Scholar
  17. Condry, J. (1980). The psychology of television. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, D. M. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics. Sex Roles, 23, 325-333.Google Scholar
  19. Donohue, T. R. (1975). Black children's perceptions of favorite TV characters as models of antisocial behavior. Journal of Broadcasting, 19, 153-157.Google Scholar
  20. Fox Family heralds two new arrivals!; The Boyz Channel and The Girlz Channel. (1998, October 27). PR Newswire, p. 1.Google Scholar
  21. Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Zellman, G. L. (1978). Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Frueh, T., & McGhee, P. E. (1975). Traditional sex role development and amount of time spent watching television. Developmental Psychology, 111, 109.Google Scholar
  23. Gantz, W., & Wenner, L. A. (1991). Men, women, and sports:Audience experiences and effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 233-243.Google Scholar
  24. Gerbner, G. (1993). Women and minorities on television: A study in casting and fate. A report to the Screen Actors Guild and The American Federation of Radio and Television Artists. Philadelphia, DE: University of Pennsylvania,The Annenberg School for Communication.Google Scholar
  25. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Gunter, B. (1994). The question of media violence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 163-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Herrett-Skjellum, J., & Allen, M. (1995, November). Television programming and sex stereotyping: Ameta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association Convention, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  28. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1985). Developmental differences in responses to a television character's appearance and behavior. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1065-1074.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1990). Forewarning of a threat and prior knowledge of outcome: Effects on children's emotional responses to a film sequence. Human Communication Research, 16, 323-354.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Factors affecting children's enjoyment of a frightening film sequence. Communication Monographs, 58, 41-62.Google Scholar
  31. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  32. Hosmer, D.W., Jr., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 4, 4th ed., pp. 387-467). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Izard, C. E., Dougherty, L., & Hembree, E. (1983). A system for identifying affect expression by holistic judgments (AFFEX). Newark: Instructional Resources Center, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  35. Kuryla, M. (1996, January 1). Girls get their own shows. Variety, 361, 73.Google Scholar
  36. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82-173). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Luecke-Aleksa, D., Anderson, D. R., Collins, P. A., & Schmitt, K. L. (1995). Gender constancy and television viewing. Development Psychology, 31, 773-780.Google Scholar
  38. Lyle, J., & Hoffman, H. R. (1972). Children's use of television and other media. In E. A. Rubinstein, G. A. Comstock, & J. P. Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 129-256). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  39. Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  40. Mifflin, L. (1998, November 2). Planned TV channels raise gender stereotype worries. New York Times, p. C8.Google Scholar
  41. Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 56-81). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mischel, W. (1970). Sex-typing and socialization. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Charmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 3-72). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Norusis, M. J. (1992). Spss for Windows: Advanced statistics (Release 5). Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  44. O'Brien, M., Peyton, V., Mistry, R., Hruda, L., Jacobs, A., Caldera, Y., et al. (2000). Gender-role cognition in three-year-old boys and girls. Sex Roles, 42, 1007-1024.Google Scholar
  45. Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315-342.Google Scholar
  46. Oliver, M. B. (2000). The respondent gender gap. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment (pp. 215-234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Petrozello, D. (1998, November 2). Fun with digital Dick & Jane. Broadcasting and Cable, 40-41.Google Scholar
  48. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pollitt, K. (1991, April 7). The smurfette principle. New York Times Magazine, 140, 222-223.Google Scholar
  50. Shields, S. A. (1987). Women, men, and the dilemma of emotion. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 229-250). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Signorielli, N. (1990). Children, television and gender roles: Messages and impact. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 11, 50-58.Google Scholar
  52. Slaby, R. G., & Frey, K. S. (1975). Development of gender constancy and selective attention to same-sex models. Child Development, 46, 849-856.Google Scholar
  53. Sparks, G. G. (1986). Developing a scale to assess cognitive responses to frightening films. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 65-73.Google Scholar
  54. Stereotypical TV: Gender dividing cable channels will teach all the wrong lessons. (1998, November 4). Intelligencer Journal, A10.Google Scholar
  55. Tamborini, R., & Stiff, J. (1987). Predictors of horror film attendance and appeal: An analysis of the audience for frightening films. Communication Research, 14, 415-436.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, T. L., & Zerbinos, E. (1995). Gender roles in animated cartoons: Has the picture changed in 20 years? Sex Roles, 32, 651-673.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, T. L., & Zerbinos, E. (1997). Television cartoons: Do children notice it's a boy's world? Sex Roles, 37, 415-432.Google Scholar
  58. Valkenburg, P. M., Cantor, J., & Peeters, A. L. (2000). Fright reactions to television: A child survey, Communication Research, 27, 82-99.Google Scholar
  59. Van Evra, J. (1990). Television and child development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Williams, J. E., Bennett, S. M., & Best, D. L. (1975). Awareness and expression of sex stereotypes in young children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 635-642.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, B. J., Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1987). Children's perceptions of the effectiveness of techniques to reduce fear from mass media. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 39-52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA;
  2. 2.Texas A & M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations