Journal of Near-Death Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 191–206 | Cite as

Changes in Heart Transplant Recipients That Parallel the Personalities of Their Donors

  • Paul Pearsall
  • Gary E. R. SchwartzEmail author
  • Linda G. S. Russek


It is generally assumed that learning is restricted to neural and immune systems. However, the systemic memory hypothesis predicts that all dynamical systems that contain recurrent feedback loops store information and energy to various degrees. Sensitive transplant patients may evidence personal changes that parallel the history of their donors. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether changes following heart transplant surgery parallel the history of the donors. We conducted open-ended interviews with volunteer transplant recipients, recipient families or friends, and donor families or friends, in hospitals in various parts of the country. Patients included ten recipients who had received heart or heart–lung transplants. Main outcome measures were transcripts of audiotaped interviews quoted verbatim. Two to 5 parallels per case were observed between changes following surgery and the histories of the donors. Parallels included changes in food, music, art, sexual, recreational, and career preferences, as well as specific instances of perceptions of names and sensory experiences related to the donors. The incidence of recipient awareness of personal changes in cardiac transplant patients is unknown. The effects of the immunosuppressant drugs, stress of the surgery, and statistical coincidence are insufficient to explain the findings. We suggest that cellular memory, possibly systemic memory, is a plausible explanation for these parallels.

heart transplant personality change cellular memory alternative medicine energy medicine systemic memory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Hameroff, S. R, and Penrose, R. (1996). Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. In Hameroff, S. R., Kaszniak, A.W., and Scott, A. C. (Eds.), Toward a science of consciousness: The first Tucson discussions and debates (pp. 507-540). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  2. James, W. (1897). Presidential address. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 12, 2-10.Google Scholar
  3. Kuhn, W. F., Myers, B., Brennan, A. F., Davis, M. H., Lippmann, S. B., Gray, L. A., and Pool, G. E. (1988). Psychopathology in heart transplant candidates. Journal of Heart Transplantation, 7, 223-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lunde, D. T. (1967). Psychiatric complications of heart transplants. American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 1190-1195.Google Scholar
  5. Mai, F. M. (1986). Graft and donor denial in heart transplant recipients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1159-1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York, NY: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  7. Pearsall, P. (1998)The heart's code: Tapping the wisdom and power of our heart energy.The new findings about cellular memories and their role in the mind/body/spirit connection. New York, NY: Broadway BooksGoogle Scholar
  8. Russek, L. R. S., and Schwartz, G. E. R. (1994). Interpersonal heartbrain registration and the perception of parental love: A 42year followup of the Harvard Mastery of Stress Study. Subtle Energies, 5, 195-208.Google Scholar
  9. Russek, L. G. S., and Schwartz, G. E. R. (1996). Energy cardiology: A dynamical energy systems approach for integrating conventional and alternative medicine. Advances: The Journal of MindBody Health, 12(4), 4-24.Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz, G. E. R., and Russek, L. G. S. (1997). Dynamical energy systems and modern physics: Fostering the science and spirit of complimentary and alternative medicine. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 3(3), 46-56.Google Scholar
  11. Schwartz, G. E. R., and Russek, L. G. S. (1998a). Do all dynamical systems have memory? Implications of the systemic memory hypothesis for science and society. In Pribram, K. H. (Ed.), Brain and values: Is a biological science of values possible? (pp. 259-273).Google Scholar
  12. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schwartz, G. E. R., and Russek, L. G. S. (1998b). The origin of holism and memory in nature: The systemic memory hypothesis. Frontier Perspectives, 7(2), 23-30.Google Scholar
  13. Schwartz, G. E. R., and Russek, L. G. S. (1998c). The plausibility of homeopathy: The systemic memory mechanism. Integrative Medicine, 1(2), 53-60.Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, G. E.R., and Russek, L.G. S. (1999). The living energy universe. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton RoadsGoogle Scholar
  15. Song, L. Z. Y. X., Schwartz, G. E. R., and Russek, L. G. S. (1998). Heart focused attention and heartbrain synchronization: Energetic and physiological mechanisms. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 4(5), 44-63.Google Scholar
  16. Sylvia, C., and Novak, W. (1997). A change of heart. New York, NY: Warner BooksGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiller, W. A. (1997). Science and human transformation: Subtle energies, intentionality and consciousness. Walnut Creek, CA: Pavior.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Pearsall
    • 1
  • Gary E. R. Schwartz
    • 2
    Email author
  • Linda G. S. Russek
    • 2
  1. 1.University of HawaiiUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations