Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 45, Issue 1–2, pp 31–52 | Cite as

Young Adults' Perceptions and Memories of a Televised Woman Hero

  • Sandra L. Calvert
  • Tracy A. Kondla
  • Karen A. Ertel
  • Douglas S. Meisel
Article

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-nine young adults viewed one of three episodes of a television program about a female action hero titled Xena: Warrior Princess. Programs varied in portrayals of Xena's shadow, the dark but also life-preserving facet of the personality. Participants of both genders who had higher levels of traditionally masculine personality characteristics were most likely to perceive Xena as a role model. Men were more likely than women to perceive Xena as a role model when she was portrayed with very little male shadow. Story themes describing women's heroic roles involved using your mind, not the sword, as well as the value of compassion during conflicts, themes that are in keeping with traditional feminine values. The results suggest that viewer acceptance of heroic qualities in women depends on viewer characteristics as well as program themes that include valued feminine qualities. Implications for portrayals of heroic women characters are discussed.

Keywords

Young Adult Social Psychology Personality Characteristic Role Model Television Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of gendertyping. Psychological Review, 88, 352-364.Google Scholar
  3. Calvert, S. (1999). Children's journeys through the information age. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Calvert, S., & Huston, A. (1987). Television and children's gender schemata. In L. Liben & M. Signorella (Eds.), Children's gender schemata: Origins and implications. In the quarterly series, New Directions in Child Development, 38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, E. (1998, October 4). Disney's character flaws. The Washington Post, pp. F1, F4.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, C., & Nordby, V. (1973). A primer of Jungian psychology. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
  7. Heilman, M., & Stopeck, M. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 70, 379-388.Google Scholar
  8. Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Huston, A. (1983). Sex-typing. In E. M. Hetheringon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Huston, A., Wright, J., Rice, M., Kerkman, D., & St. Peters, M. (1990). The development of television viewing patterns in early childhood: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 26, 409-420.Google Scholar
  11. Inness, S. (1999). Tough girls: Women warriors and wonder women in popular culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jung, C. (1954). Collected works: Vol. 9i. The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jung, C. (1959). The basic writings of C.G. Jung. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  14. Jung, C. (1968). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self. In Sir H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans., 2nd ed., Vol. 9, Part II). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Polster, M. (1992). Eve's daughters: The forbidden heroism of women. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Pratt, A. (1985). Spinning among fields: Jung, Frye, Levi-Strauss and feminist archetypal theory. In E. Lauter & C. Rupprecht (Eds.), Feminist archetypal theory. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  17. Renn, J., & Calvert, S. (1993). The relation between gender schemas and young adults' recall of stereotyped and counterstereotyped television content. Gender Roles, 28, 449-459.Google Scholar
  18. Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Ruble, D., & Martin, C. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Spence, J., & Helmrich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ventura, M. (1998, December). Warrior women. Psychology Today.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra L. Calvert
    • 1
  • Tracy A. Kondla
    • 1
  • Karen A. Ertel
    • 1
  • Douglas S. Meisel
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityUSA;

Personalised recommendations