Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 241–249 | Cite as

The Lame and the Blind, or how much Physics does Chemistry Need?

  • Nikos Psarros
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. D. Hartmann. Naturwissenschaftliche Theorien. Mannheim a.o.: Bibliographisches Institut, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. G.K. Hunter. Is Biology Reducible to Chemistry? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 40: 130-138, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. P. Janich. Protophysics of Time. Constructive Foundation and History of Time Measurement. Dordrecht a.o., 1985.Google Scholar
  4. P. Janich. The Concept of Mass. In R.E. Butts and J.R. Brown (Eds.), Constructivism and Science. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. P. Janich. Protochemie, Programm einer konstruktiven Chemiebegründung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25: 71-87, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Mosini. Some Considerations on the Reducibility of Chemistry to Physics. Epistemologia 17: 205-223, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. N. Psarros. What has Philosophy to Offer to Chemistry? Foundations of Science 3: 183-202, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Psarros, The Tiniest Parts of... — The Concept of Molecule in Chemistry, Physics and Biology. In P. Janich and N. Psarros (Eds.), The Autonomy of Chemistry in Relationship to the other Natural Sciences. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 1998b.Google Scholar
  9. N. Psarros. Die Chemie und ihre Methoden. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. J.L. Ramsey. Molecular Shape, Reduction, Explanation and Approximate Concepts. Synthese 111: 233-251, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Psarros. Things, Stuffs, and Coincidence — A Non-Ontological Approach. Hyle 7: 1-7, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. D. Rothbart. On the Relationship between Instrument and Specimen in Chemical Research. Foundations of Chemistry 1: 257-270, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. E.R. Scerri. Correspondence and Reduction in Chemistry. In S. French and H. Kamminga (Eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. E.R. Scerri. It all Depends what you Mean by Reduction. In K. Mainzer, A. Müller and W.G. Saltzer (Eds.), From Simplicity to Complexity. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. H. Vancik. Opus Magnum: An Outline for the Philosophy of Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 1: 241-256, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. G.K. Vemulapalli and H. Byerly. Remnants of Reductionism. Foundations of Chemistry 1: 17-41, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikos Psarros
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations