Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 251–266 | Cite as

Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching

  • Deryn M. Watson
Article

Abstract

This paper addresses a conundrum: despite the ubiquity of technology in the business world, no clear role has emerged in education. After many years of national policies and investment in Information Technologies in the UK and elsewhere, technology is still an imposed and novel 'outsider' in the pedagogy of schools. This paper charts a series of experiences and failures in the UK, and highlights the unresolved dichotomy of purpose about why Information and Communication Technology (ICT) should be used in education. Understanding the problematic of using Information Technologies demands a consideration of some more fundamental educational issues. ICT is often perceived as a catalyst for change, change in teaching style, change in learning approaches, and change in access to information. Yet the rhetoric for change has been too associated with the symbolic function of technology in society, which sits uncomfortably with teachers' professional judgements. So educational computing, it would appear, has yet to find its own voice. This paper explores this notion.

ICT and pedagogy teachers change information knowledge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTa) (2000) Connecting Schools, Networking People 2000: ICT Planning, Purchasing and Good Practice for the National Grid for Learning. BECTa, Coventry. [www.becta.org.uk].Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. S. (ed) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bowers, C. (1998) The Cultural Dimension of Educational Computing. Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bryson, M. and de Castell, S. (1994) Telling tales out of school: modernist, critical and postmodern “true stories” about educational computing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(3), 199–221.Google Scholar
  5. Carnall, C. (1990) Managing Change in Organisations. Prentice-Hall, London.Google Scholar
  6. Conlon, T. (2000) Visions of change: information technology, education and postmodernism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 109–116.Google Scholar
  7. Cornu, B. (2000) Didactics, information and communication technologies, and the teacher of the future. In The Bookmark of the School of the Future, H. Taylor and P. Hogenbirk (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Cuban, L. (1986) Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Department for Education (1989, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1997) Survey of Information Technology in Schools. DES/ DfEE, London.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Education and Science (1990) Technology in the National Curriculum. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Education (1995) Information Technology in the National Curriculum. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Education and Employment (2001) Curriculam Online-A Consultation Paper. www.dfee. gov.org [June 2001].Google Scholar
  13. Department for Education and Employment (1997) Connecting the Learning Society: National Grid for Learning The Government's Consultation Paper. DfEE, London.Google Scholar
  14. Department for Educational Employment (1998) The Government's National Grid for Learning Challenge. NGfL. www.ngfl.gov.uk.Google Scholar
  15. Fullan, M. (1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change. (Second edition). Cassell, London.Google Scholar
  16. Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jarman, R., Reilly, C., and McNally, H. (1992) Pupils' Learning and Accesses to Information Technology: An Evaluation. School of Education, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
  17. Gates, B. (1996) The Road Ahead. Viking, London.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1985) Politics as Technology: The Return of Grand Theory V, Jurgen Habermas, Australian Society, 17.5.85.Google Scholar
  19. Goodson, I. F., Mangan, J. M., and Rhea, V. A. (1991) Curriculam and Context in the Use of Computers for Classroom Learning: Summative Report from the Project. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
  20. Hawkridge, D. (1990) Who needs computers in schools, and why? In Computer Assisted Learning, M. Kibby (ed), Selected Proceedings from the CAL'89 Symposium. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Her Majesties Inspectorate (1989) Information Technology from 5 to 16. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  22. MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds) (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  23. McKinsey and Company (1997) The Future of Information Technology in UK Schools. McKinsey and Company, London.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, L. and Olson, J. (1994) Putting the computer in its place: a study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 121–141.Google Scholar
  25. Moran, E. (1999) Les sept savoirs necessaires a l'education du futur. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. National Curriculum Council (1989) Non-Statutory Guidance: Information Technology Capability. NCC, New York.Google Scholar
  27. OFSTED (2001) ICT in schools: the impact of government initiatives. An Interim Report April 2001. Office for Standards in Education, London.Google Scholar
  28. Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. Harvester Press, Brighton.Google Scholar
  29. Passey, D. (1999) Strategic Evaluation of the impact on learning of educational technology. Education and Information Technologies, 4(3) 223–250.Google Scholar
  30. Pelgrum, W. J. and Plomp, T. (1991) The Use of Computers in Education Worldwide. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Pelgrum, W. J. and Anderson, R. E. (eds) (1999) ICT and the Emerging Paradigm for Lifelong Learning. IEA, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  32. Preston, N. (1992) Computing and teaching: A socially critical review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 8, 49–56.Google Scholar
  33. Ragsdale, R. (1991) Effective computing in education. Teachers, tools and training. Education and Computing, 7, 157–166.Google Scholar
  34. Ridgeway, J. (2001) What to put in the bookmark of the school of the future: Building on an evidence base. In The Bookmark of the School of the Future, H. Taylor and P. Hogenbirk (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Sarason, S. B. (1990) The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  36. Selwyn, N. (2000) Researching computers and education-glimpses of the wider picture. Computers and Education, 34, 93–101.Google Scholar
  37. Somekh, B. (2000) New technology and learning: policy and practice in the UK, 1980-2010. Education and Information Technologies, 5(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
  38. Stevenson, D. (1997) Information and Communications Technology in UK Schools: An Independent Inquiry. Independent ICT in Schools Commission, London.Google Scholar
  39. Times Educational Supplement (TES). Schools lead in IT. 24.2.95.Google Scholar
  40. Turkle, S. (1996) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of Internet. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.Google Scholar
  41. Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Simon Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Watson, D. M. (ed) (1993) The Impact Report: An Evaluation of the Impact of Information Technology on Children's Achievements in Primary and Secondary Schools. Department for Education and King's College Centre for Educational Studies, London.Google Scholar
  43. Watson, D. and Tinsley, D. (eds) (1995) Integrating Information Technology into Education. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  44. Watson, D. M. (1993) Do enthusiastic users inhibit change? In D. C. Johnson and B. Samways (eds), Informatics and Changes in Learning, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 269–276.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, D. M. (1998) Blame the technocentric artefact! What research tells us about problems inhibiting teacher use of IT. In Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries, G. Marshall and M. Ruohonen (eds), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 185–192.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., and Tuson, J. (2000) Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.Google Scholar
  47. Willis, J. (1993) What conditions encourage technology use? It depends on the context. Computers in the Schools, 9(4), 13–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deryn M. Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationKing's College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations