Religious Intellectuals, the “Woman Question,” and the Struggle for the Creation of a Democratic Public Sphere in Iran

  • Farideh Farhi


The ideas of the new generation of religious intellectuals in Iran have been the main engine for the call for reform. These intellectuals have attempted to locate their views about the way women are and should be treated in Islamic societies in their much broader—and to them more significant—attempt to offer a modernist religious understanding and a more democratic reading of the role of religion in modern polity. Iranian feminists, on the other hand, have begun to insist that the particular situation of women in Iran is in need of more attention. Religious intellectuals have responded by engaging in reluctant analysis of the way the “woman question” poses itself in the Iranian context. So far, their analyses fail to take into account the gender implications of the struggle against absolutism and traditional authority. However, the dynamic interaction of the reform project with demands and aspirations of various sectors of Iranian public life will not allow the issue to rest here. Religious intellectuals, in their attempt to recreate essential religious truth in the form of new intellectual concepts and systems, will increasingly have to deal with systemic gender inequalities in a more systematic manner.

religious intellectuals women Iran Islam 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdi, Abbas 1378/1999. Interviews in Zanan, Nos. 57, 58, 59, including, “Roashanfekri-ye Dini va Masayel-eh Foritar az Masale-ye Zanan” (Religious Intellectualism and More Urgent Problems than theWomen's Problem), Zanan 58 (Azar).Google Scholar
  2. Adelkhah, Fariba 2000. Being Modern in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, Leila 1986. “Women and the Advent of Islam.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11, 4.Google Scholar
  4. Alavi Tabar, Alireza 1379/2000. “Masale-ye Zanan dar Iran (Women's Problem in Iran), Zanan 65 (Tir).Google Scholar
  5. Appadurai, Arjun 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Babayan, Kathryn 1998. “The Aqa'id al-Nisa: A Glimpse at Safavid Women in Local Isfahani Culture,” in Gavin R. G. Hambly (ed.), Women in the Medieval Islamic World: Power, Patronage, and Piety, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baqi, Emadeddin 1378/1999. Interviews in Zanan, Nos. 57, 58, 59.Google Scholar
  8. Birjandi, Mahmoud Fazel. 1379/2000. “Mardan, bedouneh Zanan” (Men, without Women), Jameah-Madani 1, 18 (8 Bahman).Google Scholar
  9. Calhoun, Craig (ed.) 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eley, Geoff 1992. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century,” in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eshkevari, Hassan Youssefi 1379/2000. Zanan 62 (Farvardin).Google Scholar
  12. Farhi, Farideh 1999. “Political Islam in Iran,” The Brown Journal of International Affairs, 6:1 (Winter/Spring).Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, Nancy 1997. Justice Interrupts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jurgen 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the Category of the Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hambly, Gavin R.G. 1998. Women in the Medieval IslamicWorld: Power, Patronage, and Piety. New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jahanbegloo, Ramin 2000. “The Role of the Intellectuals,” Journal of Democracy 11, 4 (October).Google Scholar
  17. Jalaeipour, Hamidreza 2000. “Religious Intellectuals and Political Action in the Reform Movement.” Paper presented at the Conference on Intellectual Trends in 20th Century Iran, Princeton University, October, 21. Posted at Scholar
  18. Jalaeipour, Hamidreza 1378/1999. Response to questions posed in Zanan 59 (Dey), 38–9.Google Scholar
  19. Kar, Mehrangiz 1377/1998. “Roshanfekri-ye Dini va Masale-ye Zanan” (Religious Intellectualism and theWomen's Problem), Rah-e No 1, 16 (17 Mordad).Google Scholar
  20. Kashi, Mohammad Javad 1379/2000. Interview in Zanan 61.Google Scholar
  21. Khoramshahi, Bahauddin 1378/1999. Discussion with Abdolkarim Soroush on the prophetic experience, Kiyan 74 (Tir).Google Scholar
  22. Malekian, Mostafa 1379/2000. “Zan, Mard, Kodam Tasvir?” (Woman, Man, which Image?), Zanan 64 (Khordad).Google Scholar
  23. Mardiha, Morteza 1378/1999. “Masale-ye ‘Zanan’ Nah, ‘Masale-ye Zanan” ('Women's’ Problem No, ‘Women's Problem') Zanan 60 (Bahman).Google Scholar
  24. The Merriam Webster Dictionary 1998. “Intellectualism,” Tenth edition. Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  25. Mir-hosseini, Ziba 1999. Islam and Gender: The Religious Debate in Contemporary Iran. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mobasser, Nilou 1378/1999. Translation of Abdolkarim Soroush, “Qabz va Bast-e Hoquq-e Zanan” (Contraction and Expansion of Women's Rights), Zanan 59 (8 Dey). Posted at Scholar
  27. Moghissi, Haideh 1999. Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mohamadi, Majid 1378/1999. “Jensiat: Khat-e Qermez-e Roshanfekran-e Dini” (Sexuality: The Red Line of Religious Intellectuals), Zanan 58 (Azar).Google Scholar
  29. Najmabadi, Afsaneh 1993. “Veiled Discourse-Unveiled Bodies.” Feminist Studies 19, 3 (Fall), 1993: 486–517.Google Scholar
  30. Nateq Nouri, Ali Akbar 1379/2000. Interview in Kayhan, 26 and 27 (Bahman).Google Scholar
  31. Norouzi, Kambiz 1379/2000. “Hoquq-e Zanan: Tarh-e Masale-ye Digar” (Women's Rights: Putting Forth Another Issue), Zanan 67 (Shahrivar).Google Scholar
  32. Nourbaksh, Safoura 1378/1999. “Masale-ye Mardiha Nah Masale-ye Zanan” (Mardiha's Problem Not Women's Problem), Zanan 61 (Esfand).Google Scholar
  33. The Oxford English Dictionary 1991. “Intellectualism,” Second (boxed) edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sadri, Mahmoud and Ahmad Sadri 1999. “Introduction,” to Abdolkarim Soroush, Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Saghafi, Morad 1999. “The Temptation of Democracy,” The Middle East Report, 212 (Fall).Google Scholar
  36. 2001. Postings of articles about and interviews with Abdolkarim Soroush.Google Scholar
  37. Soltani, Ebrahim K. 2000. “The New Generation of Muslim Intellectuals in Iran: A Copernican Revolution,” Paper presented at the Conference on Intellectual Change and the New Generation of Iranian Intellectuals held at theWoodrowWilson International Center for Scholars, October 24.Google Scholar
  38. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1379/2000. Interview with Jeameah-Madani (23 Bahman).Google Scholar
  39. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1999. Lectures and interviews on Islam and women in Ziba Mir-hosseini Islam and Gender: The Religious Debate in Contemporary Iran. Princeton, Princeton University Press. (1999).Google Scholar
  40. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1378/1999a. “Qabz va Bast-e Hoquq-e Zanan” (Contraction and Expansion of Women's Rights), Zanan 59 (8 Dey). Translated by Nilou Mobasser and posted at Scholar
  41. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1378/1999b. Discussion with Bahauddin Khoramshahi on the prophetic experience. Kiyan 74 (Tir).Google Scholar
  42. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1378/1999c. “Intellectuals: The Powerless Wielders of Power,” an interview posted at Scholar
  43. Soroush, Abdolkarim 1370/1991. “Farbehtar az Ideolozhi” (More Robust than Ideology), first published in Kiyan and then as a book in Tehran by Sarat Cultural Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Tavakoli-Targhi, Mohamad 2000. Review of Mehrzad Boroujerdi, “Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farideh Farhi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations