Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 693–712 | Cite as

The Effects of Treatments for Depression on Perceived Failure in Self-Regulation

  • Timothy J. Strauman
  • Gregory G. Kolden
  • Valerie Stromquist
  • Nancy Davis
  • Lori Kwapil
  • Erin Heerey
  • Kristin Schneider
Article

Abstract

Two studies examined the effect of treatments for depression on perceived failure in self-regulation, operationalized as within-self discrepancy. In Study 1, patients received group cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT); in Study 2, patients received either individual CBT, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), or medication. Treatments showed equivalent efficacy, but only psychotherapy was associated with decreased self-discrepancy and priming reactivity. Highly self-discrepant patients showed less improvement than other patients in all treatments, even after controlling for initial severity. The findings suggest that treatments differ in their impact on self-regulatory cognition, and that highly self-discrepant patients may require longer or alternative treatment.

depression cognitive–behavioral therapy interpersonal psychotherapy self-regulation self-discrepancy antidepressant medication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Antonuccio, D. O., Danton, W. G., & DeNelsky, G. Y. (1995). Psychotherapy versus medication for depression: Challenging the conventional wisdom with data. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 574–585.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 561–571.Google Scholar
  4. Beutler, L. (1991). Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.'s verdict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 226–232.Google Scholar
  5. Blatt, S. J. (1995). The destructiveness of perfectionism: Implications for the treatment of depression American Psychologist, 50, 1003–1020.Google Scholar
  6. Brewin, C. R. (1989). Cognitive change processes in psychotherapy. Psychological Review, 96, 379–394.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  8. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3–52). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Cicchetti, D., & Tucker, D. (1994). Development and self-regulatory structures of the mind. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 533–549.Google Scholar
  10. Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.Google Scholar
  11. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, M., Piasecki, J., Kriss, M., & Hollon, S. (1984). Raters' manual for the Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (Patient ed., SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Gottschalk, L. A., & Gleser, G. C. (1969). The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gottschalk, L. A., & Hoigaard-Martin, J. (1986). A depression scale applicable to verbal samples. Psychiatry Research, 17, 213–227.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
  17. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.Google Scholar
  18. Higgins, E.T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46).Google Scholar
  19. Higgins, E. T., Bond, R., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. J. (1986). Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, type and accessibility of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 5–15.Google Scholar
  20. Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1992). Cognitive therapy and the prevention of depression. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 89–95.Google Scholar
  21. Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308.Google Scholar
  22. Kendler, K. S., Kessler, R. D., Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1993). The prediction of major depression in women: Toward an integrated etiologic model. Archives of General Psychiatry, 150, 1139–1148.Google Scholar
  23. Klerman G. L., Weissman, M. M., Rounsaville, B. J., & Chevron, E. S. (1984). Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Kupfer, D. (1993). The mission of therapeutics. Neuropsychopharmacology, 9, 169–180.Google Scholar
  25. Ogles, B. M., Sawyer, J.D., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 321–326.Google Scholar
  26. Persons, J. B., & Miranda, J. (1995). The search for mode-specific effects of cognitive and other therapies: A methodological suggestion. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 102–112.Google Scholar
  27. Persons, J. B., Thase, M. E., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1996). The role of psychotherapy in the treatment of depression: A review of two practice guidelines. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 283–290.Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, L., & O'Hara, M. (1993). Self-discrepancies in clinically anxious and depressed university students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 282–287.Google Scholar
  30. Segal, Z. V., & Ingram, R. E. (1994). Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 663–695.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, B. (1984). Specification of the training and evaluation of cognitive therapists for outcome studies. In J. B.W. Williams & R. L. Spitzer (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Where we are and where we should go (pp. 173–188). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.Google Scholar
  33. Simons, A. D., Gordon, J. S., Monroe, S. M., & Thase, M. E. (1995). Toward an integration of psychologic, social, and biologic factors in depression: Effects on outcome and course of cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 369–377.Google Scholar
  34. Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.Google Scholar
  35. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I. History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 624–629.Google Scholar
  36. Strauman, T. J. (1989). Self-discrepancies in clinical depression and social phobia: Cognitive structures that underlie affective disorders? Journal of Abnormal Psychology,98, 1–22.Google Scholar
  37. Strauman, T. J. (1992). Self-guides, autobiographical memory, and anxiety and dysphoria: Toward a cognitive model of vulnerability to emotional distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101,87–95.Google Scholar
  38. Strauman, T. J. (1996a). Self-beliefs, self-evaluation, and depression: A perspective on emotional vulnerability. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 175–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Strauman, T. J. (1996b). Stability within the self:Alongitudinal study of the implications of self-discrepancy theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1142–1153.Google Scholar
  40. Strauman, T. J. (1999). Is depression a dysfunction in self-regulating the brain/behavior system for approach? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 571–572.Google Scholar
  41. Strauman, T. J. (2000). Self-discrepancy and major depressive disorder: Cross-sectional and predictive associations. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  42. Strauman, T. J., (2001). Self-discrepancy as a predictor of subsequent depressive symptoms. Manuscript under review, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.Google Scholar
  43. Teasdale, J. D., & Barnard, P. J. (1993). Affect, cognition, and change: Re-modeling depressive thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Whisman, M. A. (1993). Mediators and moderators of change in cognitive therapy for depression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 248–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy J. Strauman
    • 1
  • Gregory G. Kolden
    • 2
  • Valerie Stromquist
    • 2
  • Nancy Davis
    • 2
  • Lori Kwapil
    • 3
  • Erin Heerey
    • 3
  • Kristin Schneider
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology: Social and Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurham
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Wisconsin—Madison
  3. 3.Department of Psychology: Social and Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurham

Personalised recommendations