Advertisement

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 135–151 | Cite as

Noise and the PSTH Response to Current Transients: I. General Theory and Application to the Integrate-and-Fire Neuron

  • A. Herrmann
  • W. Gerstner
Article

Abstract

An analytical model is proposed that can predict the shape of the poststimulus time histogram (PSTH) response to a current pulse of a neuron subjected to uncorrelated background input. The model is based on an explicit description of noise in the form of an escape rate and corresponding hazard function. Two forms of the model are presented. The full model is nonlinear and can be integrated numerically, while the linearized version can be solved analytically. In the linearized version, the PSTH response to a current input is proportional to a filtered version of the input pulse. The bandwidth of the filter is determined by the amount of noise. In the limit of high noise, the response is similar to the time course of the potential induced by the input pulse, while for low noise it is proportional to its derivative. For low noise, a second peak occurs after one mean interval. The full nonlinear model predicts an asymmetry between excitatory and inhibitory current inputs. We compare our results with simulations of the integrate-and-fire model with stochastic background input. We predict that changes in PSTH shape due to noise should be observable in many types of neurons in both subthreshold and suprathreshold regimes.

PSTH noise integrate-and-fire noisy integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeles M (1991) Corticonics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Amit DJ, Tsodyks MV (1992). Effective neurons and attractor neural networks in cortical environment. Network 3:121.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett J (1975) Motoneuron dendrites: Role in synaptic integration. Fed. Proc. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 34:1398-1407.Google Scholar
  4. Bernander Ö, Douglas RJ, Martin KA, Koch C (1991) Synaptic background activity influences spatiotemporal integration in single pyramidal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:11569-11573.Google Scholar
  5. Brunel N, Hakim V (1999) Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput. 11:1621-1671.Google Scholar
  6. Calvin WH (1974) Three modes of repetitive firing and the role of threshold time course between spikes. Brain Res. 59:341-346.Google Scholar
  7. Cox DR (1962) Renewal Theory. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  8. Fetz EE, Gustafsson B (1983) Relation between shapes of postsynaptic potentials and changes in firing probability of cat motoneurones. J. Physiol. 341:387-410.Google Scholar
  9. Gammaitoni L, Hänggi P, Jung P, Marchesoni F (1998) Stochastic resonance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70:223-287.Google Scholar
  10. Gerstner W (1995) Time structure of the activity in neural network models. Phys. Rev. E 51(1):738-758.Google Scholar
  11. Gerstner W (1999) A framework for spiking neuron models: The spike response method. Preprint. To appear in Gielen S, et al., eds. The Handbook of Biological Physics. Elsevier. Available at http://diwww.epfl.ch/lami/team/gerstner/.Google Scholar
  12. Gerstner W (2000) Population dynamics of spiking neurons: Fast transients, asynchronous states and locking. Neural Comput. 12:1-46.Google Scholar
  13. Herrmann AK, Gerstner W (forthcoming) Noise and the PSTH response to current transients: II. Application to motoneuron data. J. Comp. Neurosci. Google Scholar
  14. Holmes W, Woody C (1989) Effects of uniform and non-uniform synaptic activation-distributions on the cable properties of modeled cortical pyramidal neurons. Brain Res. 505:12-22.Google Scholar
  15. Johannesma PIM (1968) Diffusion models of the stochastic activity of neurons. In Caianello ER, ed. Neural Networks. Springer, Berlin, pp. 116-144.Google Scholar
  16. Kempter R, Gerstner W, van Hemmen JL, Wagner H (1998) Extracting oscillations: Neuronal coincidence detection with noisy periodic spike input. Neural Comput. 10:1987-2017.Google Scholar
  17. Kenyon GT, Puff RD, Fetz EE (1992) A general diffusion model for analyzing the efficacy of synaptic input to threshold neurons. Biol. Cybern. 67(2):133-141.Google Scholar
  18. Kirkwood PA, Sears TA (1978) The synaptic connexions to intercostal motoneurones as revealed by the average common excitation potential. J. Physiol. 275:103-134.Google Scholar
  19. Kistler WM, Gerstner W, van Hemmen JL (1997) Reduction of Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a single-variable threshold model. Neural Comput. 9:1015-1045.Google Scholar
  20. Knox CK (1974) Cross-correlation functions for a neuronal model. Biophy. J. 14:567-582.Google Scholar
  21. Koch C (1999) Biophysics of computation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Midroni G, Ashby P (1989) How synaptic noise may affect cross-correlations. J. Neurosci. Meth. 27:1-12.Google Scholar
  23. Miller MI, Mark KE (1992) A statistical study of cochlear nerve discharge patterns in response to complex speech stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:202-209.Google Scholar
  24. Moore GP, Segundo JP, Perkel DH, Levitan H (1970) Statistical signs of synaptic interaction in neurons. Biophys. J. 10:876-900.Google Scholar
  25. Paré D, Shink E, Gaudreau H, Destexhe A, Lang E (1998) Impact of spontaneous synaptic activity on the resting properties of cat neocortical neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 79:1450-1460.Google Scholar
  26. Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, Moore GP (1967) Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes I. The single spike train. Biophys. J. 7:391-418.Google Scholar
  27. Plesser HE, Gerstner W (2000) Noise in integrate-and-fire neurons: from stochastic input to escape rates. Neural Comput. 12:367-384.Google Scholar
  28. Plesser HE, Tanaka S (1997) Stochastic resonance in a model neuron with reset. Phys. Lett. A 225:228-234.Google Scholar
  29. Poliakov AV, Powers RK, Binder MD (1997) Functional identification of the input-output transforms of motoneurones in the rat and cat. J. Physiol. 504(Pt. 2):401-424.Google Scholar
  30. Poliakov AV, Powers RK, Sawczuk A, Binder MD (1996) Effects of background noise on the response of rat and cat motoneurones to excitatory current transients. J. Physiol. 495(Pt. 1):143-157.Google Scholar
  31. Powers RK, Binder MD (1996) Experimental evaluation of input-output models of motoneuron discharge. J. Neurophysiol. 75:367-379.Google Scholar
  32. Rapp M, Yarom Y, Segev I (1992) The impact of parallel fiber background activity on the cable properties of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neural Comput. 4:518-533.Google Scholar
  33. Schwindt PC, Crill WE (1982) Factors influencing motoneuron rhythmic firing: Results from a voltage-clamp study. J. Neurophysiol. 48:875-890.Google Scholar
  34. Shadlen M, Newsome W (1994) Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Current Opinion in Neurobiol. 4:569-579.Google Scholar
  35. Siebert WM, Gray PR (1963) Random process model for the firing pattern of single auditory neurons. Q. Prog. Rep. Res. Lab. of Elec. MIT 71:241.Google Scholar
  36. Stein RB (1967) Some models of neuronal variability. Biophys. J. 7:37-68.Google Scholar
  37. Tuckwell HC (1989) Stochastic Processes in the Neurosciences. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  38. Uhlenbeck GE, Ornstein LS (1930) On the theory of Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36:823-841.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson HR, Cowan JD (1972) Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys. J. 12: 1-24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Herrmann
    • 1
  • W. Gerstner
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Computational NeuroscienceSwiss Federal Institute of Technology, EPFL-DILausanne-EPFLSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations