, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 117–150

Logic and Ontology

  • Nino B. Cocchiarella

DOI: 10.1023/A:1012758003706

Cite this article as:
Cocchiarella, N.B. Axiomathes (2001) 12: 117. doi:10.1023/A:1012758003706


A brief review of the historicalrelation between logic and ontologyand of the opposition between the viewsof logic as language and logic as calculusis given. We argue that predication is morefundamental than membership and that differenttheories of predication are based on differenttheories of universals, the three most importantbeing nominalism, conceptualism, and realism.These theories can be formulated as formalontologies, each with its own logic, andcompared with one another in terms of theirrespective explanatory powers. After a briefsurvey of such a comparison, we argue that anextended form of conceptual realism provides themost coherent formal ontology and, as such, canbe used to defend the view of logic as language.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nino B. Cocchiarella

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations