Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 53–57

Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism A Multimodal Approach

  • S. D. Chunilal
  • J. S. Ginsberg
Article
venous thromboembolism D-dimer pretest probabililty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL, et al. Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 1981;64:622–625.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahn SR. The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: integrating incidence, risk factors, symptoms and signs. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2315–2323.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep–vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995;345:1326–1330.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value of assessment of the pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997;350:1795–1798.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber T, et al. D–dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. Shortcut to diagnosis? Arch Intern Med 1996;156:939–945.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee AYY, Ginsberg JS. The role of D–dimer in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Curr Opin Pul Med 1997;86:93–99.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, et al. Non–invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in out–patients. Lancet 1999;353:190–195.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bates S, Grand'Maison A, Johnston M, et al. A latex D–dimer reliably excludes venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:447–453.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Kearon C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid whole blood assay for D–dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:1006–1011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Douketis J, et al. The use of the D–dimer testing and impedance plethysmographic examination in patients with clinical indications of deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1077–1081.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kearon C, Julian J, Newman T, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:663–677.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heijboer H, Buller H, Lensing AWA, et al. Comparison of realtime compression ultrasound with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1365–1369.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wells P, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of impedance plethysmography and compression ultrasound in outpatients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis. A two center paired–design prospective trial. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:1423–1427.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelson MH, et al. Detection of deep vein thrombosis: Prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR 1993;161:131–139.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spritzer CE, Norconk JJ, Sostman HD, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Chest 1993;104:54–60.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum, et al. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: Comparison with contrast venography and duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:734–741.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A, et al. Role of MR venography in the evaluation of deep venous thrombosis. Acta Radiologica 1997;38:907–912.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, et al. D–dimer testing as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. BMJ 1998;337–340.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henry JW, Relyea V, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli in patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest 1995;107:1375–1378.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulis CA, et al. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and negative pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1978;126:561–567.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung. Ann Intern Med 1983;89:891–899.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfuperfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990;263:2753–2759.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for the safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:997–1005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Remy–Jardin M, Remy J, Cauvain O, et al. Diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism with helical CT: role of two dimensional multiplanar reformations. AJR 1995;5:1131–1138.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bates SM, Grand'Maison A, Johnston M, et al. A latex D–dimer reliably excludes venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:447–453.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maeney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1422–1427.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999;210:353–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Chunilal
    • 1
  • J. S. Ginsberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MedicineJohn Hunter HospitalNew LambtonAustralia
  2. 2.McMaster University Medical CenterHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations