European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 347–356

Do cardiovascular risk factors in men depend on their spouses' occupational category?

  • C. Ribet
  • T. Lang
  • M. Zins
  • A. Bingham
  • J. Ferrières
  • D. Arveiler
  • P. Amouyel
  • S. Bonenfant
  • J.F. Chastang
  • M. Goldberg
  • P. Ducimetière
Article

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the relationships between major cardiovascular risk factors in French men and their spouses' occupational category (OC), taking their own OC into account. Design: A large sample of volunteers working in the French National Electricity and Gas Company (GAZEL). As a check of the robustness, the same analysis was performed in a population-based survey (French multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease (MONICA) registers). Setting: Any site of the company in France. Representative sample from the population of the three registers (Lille, Strasbourg, Toulouse). Participants: 9486 and 534 men respectively, in working activity, living in couple and aged 40 to 50 years. Main outcome measures: Self-reported arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, leisure time sedentary lifestyle, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and alcohol consumption. Results: In the GAZEL study, diabetes, smoking status, and alcohol consumption in men were associated with their own OC. In contrast, spouses' OC was independently associated with men's hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, sedentary lifestyle, and BMI: men whose spouses were unoccupied or workers have higher risk factors levels. In the MONICA study, the results were mostly comparable, at least for hypercholesterolemia, sedentary lifestyle, smoking status and alcohol consumption. Conclusion: Spouses' OC was independently associated with several cardiovascular risk factors in men. These results might indicate that socioeconomic status of the couple, and not only individual characteristics, should be taken into account for a better understanding of cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular risk factors Health inequalities Social class Spouses 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Desplanques G. L'inégalité socíale devant la mort. In: Bouvier-Colle MH, Vallin J, Hatton F (eds), Mortalité et causes de décès en France. Paris: INSERM Ed, 1990; 257–287.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marmot MG, Smith DG, Stansfeld S, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991; 337: 1387–1393.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic health differences in the Netherlands: A review of recent empirical findings. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 213–226.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lang T, Ducimetière P, Arveiler D, et al. Incidence, case fatality, risk factors of acute coronary heart disease and occupational categories in men aged 30–59 in France. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: 47–57.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Sociocconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: A review of the literature. Circulation 1993; 88: 1973–1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marmot MG, McDowall ME. Mortality decline and widening social inequalities. Lancet 1986; 2: 274–276.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, et al. Social capital, income inequality and mortality. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1491–1498.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haynes SG, Eaker ED, Feinleib M. Spouse behaviour and coronary heart disease in men: Prospective results from the Framingham Heart Study. I: Concordance of risk factors and the relationship of tupsychosocial status to coronary incidence. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 188: 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eaker ED, Haynes SG, Feinleib M. Spouse behaviour and coronary heart disease in men: Prospective results from the Framingham Heart Study. II: Modification of risk in Type A husbands according to the social and psychological status of their wives. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 188: 23–41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bosma H, Appels A, Sturmans F, et al. Educational level of spouses and risk of mortality: The WHO Kaunas-Rotterdam Intervention Study (KRIS). Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: 119–126.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strogatz DS, Siscovick DS, Weiss NS, et al. Wife's level of education and husband's risk of primary cardiac arrest. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 1491–1493.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldberg M, Leclerc A. Cohorte GAZEL: 20,000 Volontaires d'EDF-GDF pour la recherche médicale. Bilan 1989–1993. (The GAZEL Study cohort: 20,000 French electrical and gaz workers, volunteers for medical research. Situation in the period 1989–1993). Paris: INSERM Ed, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    INSEE. Nomenclature des Professions et Catégories Socio-professionnelles (PCS). Paris: INSEE Ed, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, et al. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents. Circulation 1994; 90: 583–612.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th Edn., Cary, NC: SAS institute, Inc. 1989.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    BMDP Manual, Version 7. University of California Press, Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, INC., 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mackenbach JP, Looman CW, Van der Meer JB. Differences in the misreporting of chronic conditions by level of education: The effect of inequalities in prevalence rates. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 706–711.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niedhammer I, Goldberg M, Leclerc A, et al. Psychosocial work environment and cardiovascular risk factors in an occupational cohort in France. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 93–100.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu K, Cedres LB, Stamler J, et al. Relationship of education to major risk factors and death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes, Findings of three Chicago epidemiologic studies. Circulation 1982; 66: 1308–1314.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hebert PR, Buring JE, O'Connor GT, et al. Occupation and risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 2253–2257.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dennis BH, Zhukovsky GS, Shestov DB, et al. The association of education with coronary heart disease mortality in the USSR Lipid Research Clinics Study. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22: 420–427.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pekkanen J, Tuomilehto J, Uutela A, et al. Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland. Br Med J 1995; 311: 589–593.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chaturvedi N, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH. The relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control and complications in the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 423–430.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chaturvedi N, Jarrett J, Shipley MJ, et al. Socioeconomie gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: Cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the Who Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Br Med J 1998; 316: 100–105.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leclerc A, Pietri F, Boitel L, et al. Level of education, lifestyle, and morbidity in two groups of white collar workers. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 403–408.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lang T, Ducimetière P. Premature cardiovascular mortality in France: Divergent evolution between social categories from 1970 to 1990. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: 331–339.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Péquignot G, Crosignani P, Terracini B, et al. Etude comparative de la consommation de tabac et d'alcool et des habitudes alimentaires dans des échantillons de population en France, Italie, Espagne et Suisse. III. Consommation d'alcool. (A comparative study of smoking, drinking and dietary habits in population samples in France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. III. Consumption of alcohol). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1988; 36: 177–185.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vernon SW, Buffler PA. The status of status inconsistency. Epidemiol Rev 1988; 10: 65–86.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shekelle RB, Ostfeld DAM, Oglesby P. Social status and incidence of coronary heart disease. J Chron Dis 1969; 22: 381–389.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suarez L, Barret-Conner E. Is an educated wife hazardous to your health? Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 1244–1249.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1988; 10: 87–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Ribet
    • 1
  • T. Lang
    • 2
  • M. Zins
    • 3
  • A. Bingham
    • 1
  • J. Ferrières
    • 2
  • D. Arveiler
    • 4
  • P. Amouyel
    • 5
  • S. Bonenfant
    • 3
  • J.F. Chastang
    • 3
  • M. Goldberg
    • 3
  • P. Ducimetière
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM U258Villejuif
  2. 2.INSERM U558Toulouse
  3. 3.INSERM U88Saint-Maurice
  4. 4.Laboratoire d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Faculté de MédecineStrasbourg
  5. 5.INSERM U508LilleFrance

Personalised recommendations