Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 115, Issue 1–4, pp 47–52 | Cite as

First demonstration of “white-light” laser cooling of a stored ion beam

  • S.N. Atutov
  • V. Biancalana
  • R. Calabrese
  • T. Clauser
  • R. Grimm
  • V. Guidi
  • G. Lamanna
  • I. Lauer
  • P. Lenisa
  • V. Luger
  • E. Mariotti
  • L. Moi
  • U. Schramm
  • V. Stagno
  • M. Stößel
  • L. Tecchio
  • V. Variale
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

“White-light” cooling of an ion beam confined in a storage ring has been demonstrated at Test Storage Ring in Heidelberg. Measurements aimed at comparing “white-light” with single-mode laser cooling show that “white-light” cooling gives lower temperatures at higher ion densities both in a coasting and in a bunched beam.

Keywords

Laser Cool Frequency Comb Bunched Beam Total Laser Power Longitudinal Velocity Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H.-J. Miesner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1992) 623.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H.-J. Miesner et al., in: Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics, Montreaux (1993), ed. Bosser, CERN94-03 349 (Geneva, 1994).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.F. Hangst et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4432.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Calabrese et al., Hyp. Interact. 99 (1996) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.N. Atutov et al., Opt. Comm. 132 (1996) 269.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. Moi, Opt. Comm. 50 (1984) 349.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Strohmeier et al., Opt. Comm. 73 (1989) 451.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    I.C.M. Littler et al., Z. Phys. D 18 (1991) 307.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Zhu, W. Oates and J.L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 46.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S.N. Atutov et al., to appear in Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. Petrich et al., Phys. Rev. A 48 (1993) 2127.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Ellert et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 314 (1992) 399.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Max-Planck-Inst. für Kernphysik, Annual Report (1996) p. 146.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    S.N. Atutov et al., Hyp. Interact. 109 (1997) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    H.-J. Miesner et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 383 (1996) 634.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Max-Planck-Inst. für Kernphysik, Annual Report (1995) p. 139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.N. Atutov
    • 1
  • V. Biancalana
    • 1
  • R. Calabrese
    • 1
  • T. Clauser
    • 1
  • R. Grimm
    • 2
  • V. Guidi
    • 1
  • G. Lamanna
    • 1
  • I. Lauer
    • 2
  • P. Lenisa
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Luger
    • 2
  • E. Mariotti
    • 1
  • L. Moi
    • 1
  • U. Schramm
    • 3
  • V. Stagno
    • 1
  • M. Stößel
    • 2
  • L. Tecchio
    • 4
  • V. Variale
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Università di Ferrara and INFN – Sezione di FerraraFerraraItaly
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik and Physikalisches Institut der UniversitätHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Sektion Physik, LMU MünchenGarchingGermany
  4. 4.Laboratori Nazionali di LegnaroLegnaro (PD)Italy

Personalised recommendations