Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 65–74

An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making

  • Joseph G. P. Paolillo
  • Scott J. Vitell
Article

Abstract

This exploratory study of ethical decision making by individuals in organizations found moral intensity, as defined by Jones (1991), to significantly influence ethical decision making intentions of managers. Moral intensity explained 37% and 53% of the variance in ethical decision making in two decision-making scenarios. In part, the results of this research support our theoretical understanding of ethical/unethical decision-making and serve as a foundation for future research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C. S. and H. J. Becker: 1978, 'The Use of Vignettes In Survey Research', Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93–104.Google Scholar
  2. Brass, D. J., K. D. Butterfield and B. C. Skaggs: 1998, 'Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective', The Academy of Management Review 23, 14–31.Google Scholar
  3. Brommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravender and M. Tuttle: 1997, 'A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265–280.Google Scholar
  4. Chonko, L. B. and S. D. Hunt: 1985, 'Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination', Journal of Business Research 13, 339–359.Google Scholar
  5. Churchill, G. A., N. Ford and O. Walker: 1976, Am Ethical Investigation on Ethical Decision Making 73 'Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction in the Salesforce', Journal of Marketing Research 13, 323–332.Google Scholar
  6. Deshpande, S. P.: 1996, 'The Impact of Ethical Climate Types on Facets of Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation,' Journal of Business Ethics 15(6), 655–660.Google Scholar
  7. Dornhoff, R. J. and C. B. Tankersley: 1975, 'Perceptual Differences in Market Transactions: A Source of Consumer Frustration', Journal of Consumer Affairs 9, 97–103.Google Scholar
  8. Dubinsky, A. J. and S. Hartley: 1986, 'A Path Analytic Study of a Model of Salesperson Performance', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 14, 36–46.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework of Understanding Ethical Decision-making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.Google Scholar
  10. Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, 'Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature', Journal of Business Ethics 13(3), 205–221.Google Scholar
  11. Harrington, S. J.: 1997, 'A Test of a Person-Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision Making in Organizations', Journal of Business Ethics 16(4), 363–375.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, J. S. and R. E. Freeman: 1999, 'Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives', Academy of Management Journal 42, 479–485.Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, 'A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing 8, 5–16.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, S. D., J. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, 'Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 53, 70–90.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision-making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  16. Kahn, W. A.: 1990, 'Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research', Academy of Management Review 15, 311–328.Google Scholar
  17. Loe, T. W., L. Ferrell and P. Mansfield: 2000, 'A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business', Journal of Business Ethics 25(3), 185–204.Google Scholar
  18. Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York)Google Scholar
  19. Rallapalli, K. C., S. J. Vitell and J. H. Barnes: 1988, 'The Influence of Norms on Ethical Judgements and Intentions: An Empirical Study of Marketing Professionals', Journal of Business Research 43, 157–168.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, M. S.: 1996, 'The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgements of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public', Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 469–474.Google Scholar
  21. Singer, M. S. and A. E. Singer: 1997, 'Observer Judgements about Moral Agents' Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity', Journal of Business Ethics 16(5), 473–484.Google Scholar
  22. Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1990, 'Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives', Journal of Macromarketing 12, 4–18.Google Scholar
  23. Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell and K. L. Kraft: 1996, 'The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1131–1140.Google Scholar
  24. Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell and G. R. Franke: 1999, 'Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  25. Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision-making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model', The Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  26. Vitell, S. J. and D. Davis: 1990, 'The Relationship Between Ethics and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 489–494.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph G. P. Paolillo
    • 1
  • Scott J. Vitell
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationThe University of MississippiUniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations