Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 20, Issue 2–3, pp 195–208

Market Discipline of Banks: The Asset Test

  • Donald P. Morgan
  • Kevin J. Stiroh
Article

Abstract

As the banking business grows more complex, government supervisors of banks seem increasingly willing to share the role of policing bank risk with private investors, especially bondholders. Using spreads on nearly 500 bank bond issues between 1993 and 1998, this paper investigates the relationship between the spreads on those bonds and the full portfolio of assets held by the issuing bank. Our results show that bond spreads reflect the overall mix of banks' assets at the time of issuance, even after controlling for the standard measures of risk and performance used in earlier studies. Banks contemplating a shift into riskier activities like trading, for example, can expect to pay higher spreads as a result. Credit card and commercial and industrial lending also carry a penalty in terms of higher spreads. Overall, these results suggest that investors do price the ex ante credit and other risks implicit in banks' asset portfolios. Their vigilance should help to deter excessive or inefficient risk taking by banks.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avery, R., T. Belton, and M. Goldberg. “Market Discipline in Regulating Bank Risk: New Evidence from the Capital Markets.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (1988), 597-619.Google Scholar
  2. Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, “New Capital Adequacy Framework.” Basel, Switzerland, June 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Benink, Harold, and Charles Calomiris. “Pushing for a Sub Debt Requirement.” The Banker (1999), 17-18.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, Allen, Sally Davies, and Mark Flannery. “Comparing Market and Supervisory Assessments of Bank Performance: Who Knows What When?” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (2000), 641-667.Google Scholar
  5. Black, Sandra, and Donald P. Morgan. “Meet the New Borrowers.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (1999).Google Scholar
  6. Bliss, Robert and Mark Flannery. “Market Discipline in the Governance of U.S. Bank Holding Companies: Monitoring vs. Influencing.” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2000).Google Scholar
  7. Calomiris, Charles. The Postmodern Bank Safety Net. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Cantor, R., and F. Packer. “The Credit Rating Industry.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review (Summer/Fall 1994), 1-26.Google Scholar
  9. Demsetz, Rebecca S., and Philip E. Strahan. “Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29 (1997), 300-314.Google Scholar
  10. Flannery, Mark J. “Using Market Information in Prudential Bank Supervision: A Review of the U.S. Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30 (1998), 273-305.Google Scholar
  11. Flannery, Mark J., and Sorin M. Sorescu. “Evidence of Bank Market Discipline in Subordinated Debenture Yields.” Journal of Finance 51 (1996), 1347-1377.Google Scholar
  12. Hentschel, L., and C. Smith. “Derivatives Regulation: Implications for Central Banks.” Monetary Policy and Financial Markets. Studienzenrum Gerzensee (1996).Google Scholar
  13. Jagtiani, Julapa, George Kaufman, and Catharine Lemieux. “Do Markets Discipline Banks and Bank Holding Companies? Evidence from Debt Pricing.” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Supervision and Regulation Department. S&R-99-3R (2000).Google Scholar
  14. Morgan, Donald P., “Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry.” American Economic Review (forthcoming 1999).Google Scholar
  15. Morgan, Donald P., and Kevin J. Stiroh. “Bond Market Discipline of Banks: Is the Market Tough Enough?” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, no. 95 (2000).Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, Donald P., and Ian Toll. “Bad Debt Rising.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 3 (1997).Google Scholar
  17. Myers, S., and R. Rajan. “The Paradox of Liquidity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1998), 733-773.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald P. Morgan
  • Kevin J. Stiroh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations