Advertisement

Archives and Museum Informatics

, Volume 13, Issue 3–4, pp 227–247 | Cite as

Science-Based Dating Methods in Historic Preservation

  • R. E. Taylor
Article

Abstract

The use of science-based dating methods in historic preservation contexts represents a specialized use of dating method technologies more broadly employed in prehistoric archaeological studies. This discussion focuses attention on the applications of the radiocarbon, dendrochronology, obsidian hydration, and archaeomagnetic dating in historic preservation. The employment of various analytical and technical approaches — of which chronometric resolution is only one aspect — in elucidating and extending descriptive observations is advancing more broadly-based and insightful understandings of the elements of the cultural patrimony of our nation.

Keywords

Information System Data Structure Information Theory Method Technology Technical Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, M.J., Science-based Dating in Archaeology (London: Longman, 1989).Google Scholar
  2. Bannister, B., “Dendrochronology”, in D. Brothwell and E. Higgs (eds.), Science in Archaeology, 2nd edition (London: Thames and Hudson, 1969), pp. 191-205.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, J. and others, “The contribution of the Swiss lake-dwellings to the calibration of radiocarbon dates”, in R. Berger and H.E. Suess (eds.), Radiocarbon Dating (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979), pp. 566-590.Google Scholar
  4. Damon, P.E. and others, “Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin”, Nature 337 (1989), 611-615.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, J.S., “Dendrochronology”, in R.E. Taylor and M.J. Aitken (eds.), Chronometric Dating in Archaeology (New York: Plenum Press, 1997), pp. 31-64.Google Scholar
  6. Eighmy, J.L. and R.S. Sternberg, Archaeomagnetic Dating (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, C.W. and others, “Determination of the age of Swiss lake dwellings as an example of dendrochronologically-calibrated radiocarbon dating”, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung 21A (1966), pp. 1173-1177.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, I., F.W. Trembour and R.E. Hughes, “Obsidian hydration dating”, in R.E. Taylor and M.J. Aitken (eds.), Chronometric Dating in Archaeology (New York: Plenum Press, 1997), pp. 297-322.Google Scholar
  9. Göksu, H.Y., M. Oberhofer and D. Regulla, Scientific Dating Methods (Dordrecht: Gluwer Academic Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar
  10. deJong, A.F.M. and W.G. Mook, “Medium-term atmospheric 14C variations”, Radiocarbon 22 (1980), pp. 267-272.Google Scholar
  11. Klein, J., J.C. Lerman, P.E. Damon and E.K. Ralph, “Calibration of radiocarbon dates: Tables based on the consensus data of the workshop on calibrating the radiocarbon time scale”, Radiocarbon 24 (1982), 103-150.Google Scholar
  12. Kojo, Y., R.M. Kalin and A. Long, “High-precision 'wiggle-matching' in radiocarbon dating”, Journal of Archaeological Science, (1994, in press).Google Scholar
  13. Kruse, H.H. and others, “Computer-matched radiocarbon dates of floating tree-ring series”, Radiocarbon 22 (1980), pp. 260-266.Google Scholar
  14. Linick, T.W., P.E. Damon, D.J. Donahue and A.J.T. Jull, “Accelerator mass spectrometry: the new revolution in radiocarbon dating”, Quaternary International 1 (1989), pp. 1-6.Google Scholar
  15. Michels, J.W., “Obsidian hydration dating”, Endeavour 10 (1986), pp. 97-100.Google Scholar
  16. Pearson, G.W. and others, “Precise calendrical dating of known growth-period samples using a 'curve fitting' technique”, Radiocarbon 28 (1986), 292-299.Google Scholar
  17. Snethkamp, P.E., R.E. Taylor, R. Maddin, L.A. Payen and P.J. Slota Jr., “The origin of the Goleta Cannons: Inferences of age based on various lines of evidence”, Historical Archaeology 24 (1990), 82-91.Google Scholar
  18. Southon, J.R. and others, “Progress in AMS measurements at the LLNL spectrometer”, Radiocarbon 34 (1992), 473-477.Google Scholar
  19. Sternberg, R., “The geophysical basis of archaeomagnetic dating”, in J.L. Eighmy and R.S. Sternberg (eds.), Archaeomagnetic Dating (Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 1990), pp. 5-28.Google Scholar
  20. Sternberg, R.S., “Archaeomagnetic dating”, in R.E. Taylor and M.J. Aitken (eds.), Chronometric Dating in Archaeology (New York: Plenum Press, 1997), pp. 323-356.Google Scholar
  21. Stevenson, C.M., J. Carpenter and B.E. Scheetz, “Obsidian dating: recent advances in the experimental determination and application of hydration rates”, Archaeometry 31 (1989), pp. 193-206.Google Scholar
  22. Stuiver, M. and R. Kra, “Calibration issue”, Radiocarbon 28 (1986), pp. 805-1030.Google Scholar
  23. Stuiver, M., “A high-precision calibration of the AD radiocarbon time scale”, Radiocarbon 24 (1982), pp. 1-26.Google Scholar
  24. Stuiver, M. (ed.), “Calibration 1993”, Radiocarbon 35 (1993), pp. 1-244.Google Scholar
  25. Suess, H. and C. Strahm, “The neolithic of Auveneir, Switzerland”, Antiquity 44 (1970), pp. 91-99.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, R.E., Radiocarbon Dating An Archaeological Perspective (Orlando: Academic Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, R.E., “Radioisotope dating by accelerator mass spectrometry: archaeological and paleo-anthropological perspectives”, in H.Y. Göksu, M. Oberhofer and D. Regulla (eds.), Scientific Dating Methods (Dordrecht: Gluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), pp. 37-54.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, R.E., “Radiocarbon dating”, in R.E. Taylor and M.J. Aitken (eds.), Chronometric Dating in Archaeology (New York: Plenum Press, 1997), pp. 65-96.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, R.E., A. Long and R.S. Kra (eds.), Radiocarbon After Four Decades An Interdisciplinary Perspective (New York: Springer Verlag, 1992).Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, R.E., L.A. Payen and P.J. Slota Jr., “The age of the Calaveras Skull: Dating the 'Piltdown Man' of the New World”, American Antiquity 57 (1992), pp. 269-275.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, R.E., J.M. Suchey, L.A. Payen, and P.J. Slota Jr., “The use of radiocarbon (14C) to identify human skeletal materials of forensic science interest”, Journal of Foresnsic Sciences 34 (1989), pp. 1196-1205.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, R.E., M. Stuiver and P.J. Reimer, “Development and extension of the calibration of the radiocarbon time scale: Archaeological applications”, Quaternary Sciuence Reviews (Quaternary Geochronology) 15 (1996), 655-668.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies for Prehistoric and Historic Preservation, OTA-E-319 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986).Google Scholar
  34. Wolfli, W., “Advances in accelerator mass spectrometry”, in N.E. Gove, A.E. Litehrland and D. Elmore (ed.), Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (Amsterdam: North-Holland Physics Publishing, 1987), pp. 1-13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiocarbon LaboratoryInstitute of Geophysics and Planetary PhysicsUSA

Personalised recommendations