Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 455–472 | Cite as

Participation disadvantage in Australian higher education: An analysis of some effects of geographical location and socioeconomic status

  • Richard James
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the resultsof a study that re-examined the relatively lowhigher education participation rate of peopleliving in rural or isolated Australia. Thefocus of the study was the goals and plans ofAustralian school students in their seniorschool years and the underlying attitudestowards education. The study suggests highereducation participation for people in rural andisolated areas may be affected less by distancefrom university campuses than by socioeconomiccircumstances and the influences of ruralsocial and cultural contexts. Socioeconomiceffects are generally more pronounced andpervasive than any effects of locationidentified by this study. The implications ofthe findings for equity policy and programs arediscussed.

access and equity higher education access and participation rurality and isolation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.S. and Vervoorn, A.E. (1983). Access to Privilege: Patterns of Participation in Australian Postsecondary Education. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, L., Aungles, P., Baker, S. and Sarris, A. (1998). The Characteristics and Perfor-mance of Higher Education Institutions. Canberra: Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs. (http://www.deetya.gov.au/highered/otherpub/characteristics.pdf)Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1990a). Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas Catalogue No. 1356.0. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1990b). Australian Standard Geographic Classification (ASGC). Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  5. Behrens, N., O'Grady, J., Hodgson, S., Hoult, P. and Hughes, A. (1978). The Huon Valley Study: Opportunities and Educational Priorities in a Tasmanian Country Area. Hobart: Education Department of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R.W., White, V.M. and Johnston, K.M. (1991). Running Twice as Hard: The Disadvantaged School Program in Australia. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (2000). Performance Indicators of Higher Education Institutions 2000: Preliminary Report. (http://www.detya.gov.au/ archive/highered/statistics/characteristics/contents.htm.) 5 April 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Employment, Education and Training, National Board of Employment, Education and Training (1990). A Fair Chance for All: National and Institutional Planning for Equity in Higher Education, a Discussion Paper. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Primary Industries and Energy and Department of Human Services and Health (1994). Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Areas Classification: 1991 Census Edition. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  10. Elsworth, G., Day, N., Hurworth, R. and Andrews, J. (1982). From School to Tertiary Study: Transition to College and University in Victoria. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  11. Floud, J. (1961). ‘Social class factors in educational achievement’, in Halsey, A.H. (ed.), Ability and Educational Opportunity. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnis, C. and Stephanou, A. (1999). Rural and Isolated Students and their Higher Education Choices: A Re-Examination of Student Location, Socioeconomic Background, and Educational Advantage and Disadvantage. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  13. Long, M, Carpenter, P. and Hayden, M. (1999). Participation in Education and Training: 1980–1994. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, P., Cooney, G., Bornholt, L., Harman, K., Ball, S. and Scott, C. (1993). Going to University. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  15. Rogoff, N. (1961). ‘Local social structure and educational selection’, in Halsey, A.H., Floud, J. and Anderson, C.A. (eds.), Education, Economy and Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Skuja, E. (1995). ‘Performance of the Australian university sector in access and equity’, in Postle, G.D., Clarke, J.R., Skuja, E., Bull, D.D., Batorowicz, K. and McCann, H.A. (eds.), Towards Excellence in Diversity: Educational Equity in the Australian Higher Education Sector in 1995: Status, Trends and Future Directions. Toowoomba: USQ Press.Google Scholar
  17. Western, J., McMillan, J. and Durrington, D. (1998). Differential Access to Higher Education: The Measurement of Socioeconomic Status, Rurality and Isolation. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, T., Long, M., Carpenter, P. and Hayden, M. (1993), Entering Higher Education in the 1980s. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard James
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Higher EducationThe University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations