Quality of Life Research

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 347–357 | Cite as

Can parents rate their child's health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review

  • Christine Eiser
  • Rachel Morse


A systematic review was conducted to determine the relationship between ratings of children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) made by parents and children. This was investigated in relation to four questions:- is agreement greater for some domains (e.g. physical HRQoL) than others?; do parents perceive illness to have a greater impact than their child?; how is agreement affected by child age, gender and illness status?; and is the relationship between proxy ratings affected by the method of data collection? Fourteen studies were identified. Consistent with previous research, there was greater agreement for observable functioning (e.g. physical HRQoL), and less for non-observable functioning (e.g. emotional or social HRQoL). Three studies assessed whether parents perceive the illness to have a greater impact than their child, but no clear conclusions could be drawn given differences in measures used. Agreement is better between parents and chronically sick children compared with parents and their healthy children, but no effects were found for age or gender. All of these results may be dependent on the specific measure of HRQoL employed. There remain strong arguments for obtaining information from both parents and children whenever possible.

Children Chronic illness Proxy raters Quality of life measures 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Goodwin DA, Boggs SR, Graham-Pole J. Development and validation of the Pediatric Oncology Quality of Life Scale. Psychol Assess 1994; 6(4): 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 743–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camp LD, O'Sullivan PS. Comparison of medical, surgical, and oncology patients' descriptions of pain and nurses' documentation of pain assessments. J Adv Nursing 1987; 12: 593–598.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teske K, Daut RL, Cleeland CS. Relationships between nurses' observations and patients' self-reports of pain. Pain 1983; 16(3): 289–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derogatis LR, Abeloff MD, McBeth CD. Cancer patients and their physicians in the perception of psychological symptoms. Psychosomatics 1976; 17: 197–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jachuck SJ, Brierley H, Jachuck S, Willcox PM. The effects of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life. J Royal College General Practice 1982; 32: 103–105.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT. Child/adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 1987; 101(2): 213–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ennett ST, DeVellis BM, Earp JA, Kredich D, Warren RW, Wilhelm CL. Disease experience and psychosocial adjustment in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: Children's versus mothers' reports. J Pediat Psychol 1991; 16(5): 557–568.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patrick DL, Bergner M. Measurement of health status in the 1990s. Annu Rev Public Health 1990; 11(165): 183.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality-of-life. Ann Internal Med 1993; 118: 622–629.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walker LS, Heflinger CA. Quality of life predictors of outcome in pediatric abdominal pain patients: Findings at initial assessment and 5–year follow-up. In: Drotar D (ed.), Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glaser AW, Abdul RN, CL U, Walker DA. School behaviour and health status after central nervous system tumours in childhood. Brit J Cancer 1997a; 76(5): 643–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glaser AW, Davies K, Walker D, Brazier D. Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood. Qual Life Res 1997b; 6(1): 43–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Billson AL, Walker DA. Assessment of health status in survivors of cancer. Arch Dis Childhood 1994; 70(3): 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phipps S, Dunavant M, Jayawardene D, Srivastiva DK. Assessment of health related quality of life in acute in-patient settings: Use of the BASES Scales in children under-going bone marrow transplantation. Int J Cancer 1999; S12: 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aaronson NK. Assessing the quality of life of patients in cancer clinical trials: Common problems and common sense. European Journal of Cancer 1992; 28A(8–9): 1304–1307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 8 for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen L, Holliday M. Statistics for Social Scientists. London. Harper & Row. 1982.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruil J. Development of a Quality of Life Instrument for Children with Chronic Illness. The Netherlands: Health Psychology, Leiden University, 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: Measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 1999; 37(2): 126–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varni JW, Katz ER, Seid M, Quiggins DJ, Friedman-Bender A, Castro CM. The Pediatric Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PCQL). I. Instrument development, descriptive statistics, and cross-informant variance. J Behavioral Med 1998; 21(2): 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eiser C, Havermans T, Craft A, Kernahan JA. Development of a measure to assess the perceived illness experience after treatment for cancer. Arch Dis Childhood 1995; 72(4): 302–307.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vogels T, Verrips GH, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in children: The development of the TACHRQOL parent form. Qual Life Res 1998; 7(5): 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Varni JW, Katz ER, Quiggins DJL, Friedman-Bender A. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory-32 (PCQL-32): I. Reliability and validity. Cancer 1998; 82: 1184–1196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Langeveld JH, Koot HM, Passchier J. Headache intensity and quality of life in adolescents: How are changes in headache intensity in adolescents related to changes in experienced quality of life? Headache 1996; 37(1): 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Theunissen NC, Vogels T, Koopman HM, et al. The proxy problem: Child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res 1998; 7(5): 387–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Czyzewski DI, Mariotto MJ, Bartholomew LK, LeCompte SH, Sockrider MM. Measurement of quality of well being in a child and adolescent cystic fibrosis population. Med Care 1994; 32(9): 965–972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: Types of validity for an index of well-being. Health Services Res 1976; 11: 478–507.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graham P, Stevenson J, Flynn D. A new measure of health-related quality of life for children: Preliminary findings. Psychol Health 1996; 12(5): 655–665.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(6): 923–928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 36(ii): 307–310.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, Sprangers MAG, Detmar SB, Wever LD, Schornagel JH. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(7): 617–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Landgraf JM, Abetz LN. Functional status and well-being of children representing three cultural groups: Initial self-reports using the CHQ-CF87. Psychol Health 1997; 12(6): 839–854.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Epstein AM, Hall JA, Tognetti J, Son LH, Conant L. Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information anout patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care? Med Care 1989; 27: S91–S98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Phipps S, Hinds PS, Channell S, Bell GL. Measurement of behavioural, affective, and somatic responses to pediatric bone marrow transplantation: Development of the BASES scale. J Pediat Oncol Nursing 1994; 11(3): 109–117.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eiser C, Koper S, Cool P, Grimer R. The perceived illness. Experience scale (PIE): reliability and validity revisited. Child, Care Health and Development 1999; 25: 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRC Child and Family Research Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of Sheffield, Western BankSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations