Advertisement

Quality and Quantity

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 389–405 | Cite as

Holism versus Reductionism in Modern Social Science Research

  • Piet J. M. Verschuren
Article

Abstract

Since an early stage in most of thetechnical sciences, and during the last fewdecades in many of the social sciences,reductionistic research has become a mainstream typeof empirical research. This research, to becharacterised methodologically in this article, hasproven to be very successful in buildinga body of abstract and generalisable theoreticalknowledge, for reasons that are made clearin this article. However, does reductionism graspreality in its full extent, the whole beingmore than the sum of its parts? In this articlearguments and research strategies for holisticempirical research are presented, offering advantagesand possibilities for modern social scienceresearch.

reductionism holistic empirical research social science research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the Future; a Systems Approach to Societal Problems. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  2. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research Design; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse de la Methode pour bien Conduire sa Raison, et Trouver la Verité dans les Sciences.Google Scholar
  5. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Lowe, A. (1991). Management Research, An Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, T.W. (1999). Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Miles, M. B. amp; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Mill, J. S. (1973). A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ragin, C. C. (1989). The Comparative Method; Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Swanborn, P. G. (1996a). A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research. Quality & Quantity 30: 19-35.Google Scholar
  15. Swanborn, P. G. (1996b). Case-Study's; Wat, Wanneer en Hoe? Amsterdam/Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
  16. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  17. Verschuren, P. J. M. (forthcoming). Case study as a research strategy; some ambiguities and opportunities.Google Scholar
  18. Verschuren, P. & Doorewaard, H. (1999). Designing a Research Project. Utrecht Holland: Lemma.Google Scholar
  19. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piet J. M. Verschuren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Methodology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations