Advertisement

Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 499–510 | Cite as

Seed banks and seed population dynamics of halophytes

  • Irwin A. Ungar
Article

Abstract

In this review I will describe the importance of seed banks and thepopulation dynamics of seeds on the distribution of species in salinehabitats. The main questions being examined in this review include: 1.Does the seed bank represent the flora of the entire salinity gradient or isit restricted to the species in each zonal community? 2. Is the size andspecies composition of the persistent seed bank regulated by the degree ofsalt stress in habitats along an environmental gradient? 3. Does thepopulation dynamics of seeds influence the temporal and spatial distributionof plant species in saline habitats? Seed banks may be transient orpersistent depending upon the physiological responses of species and thesoil environment in which the seeds are found. The formation of zonalcommunities in salt marsh environments is affected by changes in soilsalinity and flooding along an elevational gradient. Population dynamics ofseeds have been found to determine the spatial and temporal distributionof species along salinity gradients. The flora and relative density of speciesof zonal communities are significantly dependent upon the stress toleranceof species at different stages of development and the presence of transientor persistent seed banks. The occurrence of a seed bank is related to thesalinity tolerance of species at the germination stage of development, aseeds ability to tolerate hypersaline conditions and flooding, and whetheror not species are able to maintain a persistent seed bank until hypersalineconditions are alleviated.

germination halophytes salt marsh salt tolerance seed bank seed demography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D.A. 1963. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina salt marshes. Ecology 44: 445-456.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, S.K. 1995. Recovery from small-scale anthropogenic disturbances by northern California salt marsh plant assemblages. Ecol. Appl. 5: 693-702.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, S.K. 1996. Recruitment and establishment of salt marsh plants following disturbances by flooding. Amer. Midl. Nat. 136: 232-247.Google Scholar
  5. Aziz, S. and Khan, M.A. 1995. Life history characteristics of a coastal population of Cressa cretica. In: Khan, M.A. and Ungar, I.A. (eds.), Biology of Salt Tolerant Plants. pp. 15-22. University of Karachi, Karachi.Google Scholar
  6. Badger, K.S. and Ungar, I.A. 1990. Seedling competition and the distribution of Hordeum jubatum L. along a soil salinity gradient. Funct. Ecol. 4: 639-644.Google Scholar
  7. Badger, K.S. and Ungar;, I.A. 1991. Life history and population dynamics of Hordeum jubatum along a soil salinity gradient. Can. J. Bot. 69: 384-393.Google Scholar
  8. Badger, K.S. and Ungar, I.A. 1994. Seed bank dynamics in an inland salt marsh, with special emphasis on the halophyte Hordeum jubatum L. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155: 66-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakker, J.P. and DeVries, Y. 1992. Germination and early establishment of lower salt-marsh species in a grazed and mown salt marsh. J. Veg. Sci. 3: 247-252.Google Scholar
  10. Baldwin, A.H., McKee, K.L. and Mendelssohn, I.A. 1996. The in-fluence of vegetation, salinity, and inundation on seed banks of oligohaline coastal marshes. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 470-479.Google Scholar
  11. Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. 1978. Seasonal changes in the germination response of Cyperus inflexus seeds to temperature and their ecological significance. Bot. Gazette 139: 231-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. 1998. Seeds, Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Bekker, R.M., Schaminee, J.H., Bakker, J.P. and Thompson, K. 1998. Seed bank characteristics of Dutch plant communities. Acta Bot. Neerl. 47: 15-26.Google Scholar
  14. Bertness, M.D. 1991. Zonation of Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 72: 138-148.Google Scholar
  15. Bertness, M.D. and Ellison A.M. 1987. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh plant community. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 129-147.Google Scholar
  16. Bertness, M.D., Gough, L. and Shumway, S.W. 1992. Salt tolerances and the distribution of fugitive salt marsh plants. Ecology 73: 1842-1851.Google Scholar
  17. Bertness, M.D., Wise, C. and Ellison, A.M. 1987. Consumer pressure and seed set in a salt marsh perennial plant community. Oecologia 71: 190-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cantero, J.J., Leon, R., Cisneros J.M. and Cantero, A. 1998. Habitat structure and vegetation relationships in central Argentina salt marsh landscapes. Plant Ecol. 137: 79-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chapman, V.J. 1974. Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. Verlag von J. Cramer, Bremerhaven.Google Scholar
  20. Clarke, L.D. and Hannon, N.J. 1971. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney District. IV. The significance of species interaction. J. Ecol. 59: 535-553.Google Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. 1857. On the action of sea-water on the germination of seeds. J. Linn. Soc. 1: 130-140.Google Scholar
  22. Davy A.J. and Smith, H. 1988. I. Life history variation and environment. In: Davy, A.J., Hutchinson, J. and Watkinson, A.R. (eds.), Plant Population Biology. pp. 1-22. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Dodd, G.L. and Donovan, L.A. 1999. Water potential and ionic effects on germination and seedling growth of two cold desert shrubs. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1146-1153.Google Scholar
  24. Egan, T.P. and Ungar, I.A. 1999a. The effects of temperature and seasonal change on the germination of salt marsh species along a salinity gradient. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 861-867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Egan, T.P. and Ungar, I.A. 1999b. Similarity between seed banks and aboveground vegetation along a salinity gradient. J. Veg. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Egler, F.E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4: 412-417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellison, A.M. 1987. Effects of competition, disturbance, and herbivory on Salicornia europaea. Ecology 68: 576-586.Google Scholar
  28. Epstein, E. and Rains, D.W. 1987. Advances in salt tolerance. In: Gabelman, H.W. and Loughman, B.C. (eds.), Genetic Aspects of Plant Nutrition. pp. 113-125. Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Fenner, M. 1996. Seeds, the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  30. Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Gulzar, S. and Khan, M.A. 1994. Seed banks of coastal shrub communities. Ecoprint 1: 1-6.Google Scholar
  32. Hartman, J.M. 1988. Recolonization of small disturbance patches in a New England salt marsh. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1625-1631.Google Scholar
  33. Hopkins, D.R. and Parker, V.T. 1984. A study of the seed bank of a salt marsh in northern San Francisco Bay. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 348-355.Google Scholar
  34. Huiskes, A.H.L. 1979. Seedling survival of Halimione portulacoides. In: Delta Hydrobiological Research Progress Report. pp. 45-56. Yerseke.Google Scholar
  35. Hutchings, M.J. and Russell, P.J. 1989. The seed regeneration dynamics of an emergent salt marsh. J. Ecol. 77: 615-637.Google Scholar
  36. Jefferies, R.L., Davy, A.J. and Rudmick, J. 1981. Population biology of the salt marsh annual Salicornia europaea agg. J. Ecol. 69: 17-31.Google Scholar
  37. Jefferies, R.L., Jensen, A. and Bazely, D. 1983. The biology of the annual Salicornia europaea agg., at the limit of its range in Hudson Bay. Can. J. Bot. 61: 762-773.Google Scholar
  38. Jerling, L. 1983. Composition and viability of the seed bank along a successional gradient on a Baltic sea shore meadow. Holarctic Ecol. 6: 150-156.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, E.A. 1975. Buried seed populations in the subarctic forest east of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories. Can. J. Bot. 53: 2933-2941.Google Scholar
  40. Josselyn, M.N. and Perez, R.J. 1981. Sediment characteristics and vegetation colonization. In: Niessen, T. and Josselyn, M.N. (eds.), The Hayward Regional Seashore Marsh Restoration: Biological Succession During the First Year of Dike Removal. Technical Report 1, Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies. Tiburon, California.Google Scholar
  41. Jutila, H.M.E. 1998a. Effect of different treatments on the seed bank of grazed and ungrazed Baltic seashore meadows. Can. J. Bot. 76: 1188-1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jutila, H.M.E. 1998b. Seed banks of grazed and ungrazed Baltic seashore meadows. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 395-408.Google Scholar
  43. Keiffer, C.H. and Ungar, I.A. 1997. The effect of extended exposure to hypersaline conditions on the germination of five inland halophyte species. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 104-111.Google Scholar
  44. Khan, M.A. 1990. The relationship of seed bank to vegetation in a saline desert community. In: Sen, D.N. and Mohammed, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Seed Symposium. pp. 87-92. Jodphur.Google Scholar
  45. Khan, M.A. 1993. Relationship of seed bank to plant distribution in saline arid communities. Pakistan J. Bot. 25: 73-82.Google Scholar
  46. Khan, M.A. and Ungar, I.A. 1995. Biology of Salt Tolerant Plants. University of Karachi, Karachi.Google Scholar
  47. Khan, M.A. and Ungar, I.A. 1997. Effects of thermoperiod on recovery of seed germination of halophytes from saline conditions. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 279-283.Google Scholar
  48. Khan, M.A. and Ungar, I.A. 1998. Seed germination of Polygonum aviculare L. as influenced by salinity, temperature, and gibberellic acid. Seed Sci. & Tech. 26: 107-117.Google Scholar
  49. Kigel, J. and Galili, G. 1995. Seed Development and Germination. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. 1989. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, P.C. 1993. The effect of seed dispersal limitations on the spatial distribution of a gap species seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). Can. J. Bot. 71: 978-984.Google Scholar
  52. Looney, P.B. and Gibson, D.J. 1995. The relationship between the soil seed bank and above-ground vegetation of a coastal barrier island. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 825-836.Google Scholar
  53. Loveless, M.D. and Hamrick, J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maranon, T. 1998. Soil seed bank and community dynamics in an annual-dominated Mediterranean salt marsh. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 371-378.Google Scholar
  55. McGraw, J.B. 1987. Seed-bank properties of an Appalachian sphagnum bog and a model of the depth of distribution of viable seeds. Can. J. Bot. 65: 2028-2035.Google Scholar
  56. McMahon, K. and Ungar, I.A. 1978. Phenology, distribution and survival of Atriplex triangularis Willd. in an Ohio salt pan. Amer. Midl. Nat. 100: 1-14.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, W.R. and Egler, F.E. 1950. Vegetation of theWequetequock-Pawcatuck tidal-marshes, Connecticut. Ecol. Monogr. 20: 143-172.Google Scholar
  58. Milton, W.E.J. 1939. The occurrence of buried viable seeds in soils at different elevations and on a salt marsh. J. Ecol. 27: 149-159.Google Scholar
  59. Mohammed, S. and Sen, D.N. 1988. A reort of polymorphic seeds in halophytes. Current Sci. 57: 616-617.Google Scholar
  60. Myers, B.A. and Morgan, W.C. 1989. Germination of the salttolerant grass Diplachne fusca. II. Salinity responses. Aust. J. Bot. 37: 239-251.Google Scholar
  61. Packham, J.R. and Willis, A.J. 1997. Ecology of Dunes, Salt Marsh and Shingle. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  62. Parker, V.T. and Leck, M.A. 1985. Relationships of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. Amer. J. Bot. 72: 161-174.Google Scholar
  63. Philipupillai, J. and Ungar, I.A. 1984. The effect of seed dimorphism on the germination and survival of Salicornia europaea L. populations. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 542-549.Google Scholar
  64. Ranwell, D.S. 1972. Ecology of Salt Marshes and Sand Dunes. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  65. Redfield, A.C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 201-237.Google Scholar
  66. Rejmankova, E., Pope, K.O., Post R. and Maltby, E. 1996. Herbaceous wetlands of the Yucatan peninsula: communities at extreme ends of environmental gradients. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 81: 223-252.Google Scholar
  67. Roberts, H.A. 1970. Viable weed seeds in cultivated soils. Rep. Nat. Veg. Res. Station: 25-38.Google Scholar
  68. Roberts, H.A. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6: 1-55.Google Scholar
  69. Runge, F. 1972. Dauerquadratbeobachtungen bei salzweisenassoziationen. In: Tuxen, R. (ed.), Grundfragen und Methoden in der Pflanzensoziologie. pp. 419-425. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  70. Sanchez, J.M., Izco, J. and Medrano, M. 1996. Relationships between vegetation zonation and altitude in a salt-marsh system in northwest Spain. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 695-702.Google Scholar
  71. Seabloom, S.W., van der Valk, A.G. and Moloney, K.A. 1998. The role of water depth and soil temperature in determining initial composition of prairie wetland coenoclines. Plant Ecol. 138: 203-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shumway, S.W. and Bertness, M.D. 1992. Salt stress limitation of seedling recruitment in a salt marsh plant community. Oecologia 92: 490-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith, L.M. and Kadlec, J.A. 1983. Seed banks and their role during drawdown of a North American marsh. J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 673-684.Google Scholar
  74. Templeton, A.R. and Levin, D.A. 1979. Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. Amer. Nat. 114: 232-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson, K., Bakker, J. and Bekker, R. 1997. The soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density, and longevity. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Torstensson, P. 1987. Population dynamics of the annual halophyte, Spergularia marina, on a Baltic seashore meadow. Vegetatio 68: 169-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ungar, I.A. 1962. Influence of salinity on seed germination in succulent halophytes. Ecology 43: 763-764.Google Scholar
  78. Ungar, I.A. 1965. An ecological study of the vegetation of the Big Salt Marsh, Stafford County, Kansas. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 46: 1-98.Google Scholar
  79. Ungar, I.A. 1966. Salt tolerance of plants growing in saline areas of Kansas and Oklahoma. Ecology 47: 154-155.Google Scholar
  80. Ungar, I.A. 1974a. Halophyte communities of Park County, Colorado. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 101: 145-152.Google Scholar
  81. Ungar, I.A. 1974b. Inland halophytes of the United States. In: Reimold, R. and Queen, W. (eds.), Ecology of Halophytes. pp. 235-305. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  82. Ungar, I.A. 1978. Halophyte seed germination. Bot. Rev. 44: 233-264.Google Scholar
  83. Ungar, I.A. 1979. The effect of seed reserves on species composition in zonal halophyte communities. Bot. Gazette 141: 447-452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ungar, I.A. 1984. Autecological studies with Atriplex triangularis Willdenow. In: Tiedemann, A.R., McArthur, E.D., Stutz, H.C., Stevens, R. and Johnson, K.L. (eds.), Proceedings Symposium on the Biology of Atriplex and Related Chenopods. General Technical Report INT-172, pp. 40-52. U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Intermountain Range and Forest Experiment Station. Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  85. Ungar, I.A. 1987a. Population characteristics, growth, and survival of the halophyte Salicornia europaea. Ecology 68: 569-575.Google Scholar
  86. Ungar, I.A. 1987b. Population ecology of halophyte seeds. Bot. Rev. 53: 301-334.Google Scholar
  87. Ungar, I.A. 1988. A significant seed bank for Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae). Ohio J. Sci. 88: 200-202.Google Scholar
  88. Ungar, I.A. 1991. Ecophysiology of Vascular Halophytes. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  89. Ungar, I.A. 1995. Seed germination and seed-bank ecology in halophytes. In: Kigel, J. and Galili, G. (eds.), Seed Development and Germination. pp. 529-544. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  90. Ungar, I.A. 1996. Effect of salinity on seed germination, growth, and ion accumulation of Atriplex patula (Chenopodiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 604-607.Google Scholar
  91. Ungar, I.A. 1998. Are biotic factors significant in influencing the distribution of halophytes in saline habitats. Bot. Rev. 64: 176-199.Google Scholar
  92. Ungar, I.A. and Riehl, T.E. 1980. The effect of seed reserves on species composition in zonal halophyte communities. Bot. Gazette 14: 447-452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ungar, I.A. and Woodell, S.R.J. 1993. The relationship between the seed bank and species composition of plant communities in two British salt marshes. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 531-536.Google Scholar
  94. Ungar, I.A. and Woodell, S.R.J. 1996. Similarity of seed banks to aboveground vegetation in grazed and ungrazed communities on the Gower peninsula, South Wales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 746-749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ungar, I.A., Benner, D.K., and McGraw, D.C. 1979. The distribution and growth of Salicornia europaea on an inland salt pan. Ecology 60: 329-336.Google Scholar
  96. Valiela, I. and Rietsma, C.S. 1995. Disturbance of salt marsh vegetation by wrack mats in Great Sippewissett Marsh. Oecologia 102: 106-112.Google Scholar
  97. van der Valk, A.G. and Davis, C.B. 1976. The seed banks of prairie glacial marshes. Can. J. Bot. 54: 1832-1838.Google Scholar
  98. van der Valk, A.G. and Davis, C.B. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322-335.Google Scholar
  99. Venable, D.L. 1989. Modeling the evolutionary ecology of seed banks. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. pp. 67-87. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Waisel, Y. 1972. Biology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  101. Waisel, Y. 1989. Screening for salt resistance. In: Proceedings of the 21st. Colloquium of the International Potash Institute, Bern. pp. 143-155.Google Scholar
  102. Waisel, Y. 1991. Adaptation to salinity. In: Raghavendra, A. (ed.), Physiology of Trees. pp. 359-381. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  103. Welling, C.H., Pederson, R.L. and van der Valk, A.G. 1988. Temporal patterns in recruitment from the seed bank during drawdowns in a prairie wetland. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 999-1007.Google Scholar
  104. Wertis, B.A. and Ungar, I.A. 1986. Seed demography and seedling survival in a population of Atriplex trianguaris Willd. Amer. Midl. Nat. 116: 152-162.Google Scholar
  105. Wiehe, P.O. 1935. A quantitative study of the influence of tide upon populations of Salicornia europaea. J. Ecol. 23: 323-333.Google Scholar
  106. Wijte, A.H.B.M. and Gallagher, J.L. 1996a. Effect of oxygen availability and salinity on early life history stages of salt marsh plants. I. Different germination strategies of Spartina alterni-flora and Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1337-1342.Google Scholar
  107. Wijte, A.H.B.M. and Gallagher, J.L. 1996b. Effect of oxygen availability and salinity on early life history stages of salt marsh plants. II. Early seedling development advantage of Spartina alterniflora over Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1343-1350.Google Scholar
  108. Woodell, S.R.J. 1985. Salinity and seed germination in coastal plants. Vegetatio 61: 223-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zaman, A.U. and Khan, M.A. 1992. The role of buried viable seeds in saline desert plant community. Bangladesh J. Bot. 21: 1-10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irwin A. Ungar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Plant BiologyOhio UniversityAthensU.S.A

Personalised recommendations