Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 181–194 | Cite as

Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox

  • Graham Sewell
  • James R. Barker


We argue for a discursive ethic of surveillancethat accounts for the paradoxes that thephenomenon presents to today's organisationalmembers. We first we develop a genealogy ofprivacy and illustrate its relation tosurveillance, focusing on the antinomianrelationship between the “public” and “private.” Then we review the common ethicaltensions that arise in today's technologicallyintensive workplace. Lastly, we develop acritical approach to the ethical status ofprivacy and surveillance – a “micro-ethics” – that remains open todiscursively-based negotiation by those whofind themselves at the verypoint of scrutiny.


Information System User Interface Human Computer Interaction Ethical Status Technology Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Robert John Ackermann. Nietzsche: A Frenzied Look. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Jean-Marie Apostolidès. Le roi machine: Spectacle et politique au temps. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Jon Bannister, Nicholas R. Fyfe and Ade Kearns. Closed Circuit Television and the City. In Clive Norris, Jade Moran and Gary Armstrong, editors, Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television, and Social Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. James Barker and Graham Sewell. 'Here' Looking at You': Surveillance as a Trope for Organizational Domination. Department of Management Working Paper 2000/ 17, University of Melbourne, Australia, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. James R. Barker. The Discipline of Teamwork. Newbury Park CA: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. James R. Barker and George Cheney. The Concept and the Practices of Discipline in Contemporary Organizational Life. Communication Monographs, 61: 19–43, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Stanley I. Benn and Gerald Gaus. The Private and the Public in Social Policy. London: Croom Helm, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. Jeremy Bentham. The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. William Bogard. The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Roy Boyne. Post-Panopticism. Economy and Society, 29: 285–307, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Harry Braverman. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. David Brin. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. John Deigh. Ethics. In Robert Audi, editor, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. John Deigh. The Sources of Moral Agency: Essays in Moral Psychology and Freudian Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. Gilles Deleuze. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Guy Dubord. La société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet-Chastel, 1967.Google Scholar
  18. Norbert Elias. The Civilizing Process: The Development of Manners, Vol. I. New York: Urizen Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. David Flaherty. Privacy in Colonial New England. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Peter Fleming and Graham Sewell. Looking for The Good Soldier, Švejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace. Department of Management Working Paper 2000/ 18, University of Melbourne, Australia, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Michel Foucault. Space, Knowledge, and Power. In Paul Rabinow, editor, The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984a.Google Scholar
  22. Michel Foucault. On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Process. In Paul Rabinow, editor, The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984b.Google Scholar
  23. Michel Foucault. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In James Bernauer and David Rasmussen, editors, The Final Foucault. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. Michel Foucault. What is called ‘Punishing’? In James D. Faubion, editor, Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984: Volume 3 (Power). New York: New Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Colin Gordon. Introduction. In James D. Faubion, editor, EssentialWorks of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984: Volume 3 (Power). New York: New Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Ian Hacking. Making up People. In Thomas C. Heller, Morton Sosna and David E. Wellbery, editors, Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  27. Martin Heidegger. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Row, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Gertrude, Himmelfarb. The Haunted House of Jeremy Bentham. In Richard Herr and Harold T. Parker, editors, Ideas in History. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. Keith W. Hoskins and Richard H. Macve. Accounting as Discipline: The Overlooked Supplement. In Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway and David J. Sylvan, editors, Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  30. Luca D. Introna and Athanasia Pouloudi. Privacy in the Information Age: Stakeholders, Interests, and Values. Journal of Business Ethics, 22: 27–38, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. Martin Jay. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. J.L. Johnson. Privacy and the Judgement of Others. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 23: 259–275, 1989.Google Scholar
  33. David S. Landes. What Do Bosses Really Do? Journal of Economic History, XLVI: 585–623, 1986.Google Scholar
  34. Oren M. Levin-Waldman. Reconceiving Liberalism: Dilemmas of Contemporary Liberal Public Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  35. David Lyon. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  36. Stephen A. Marglin. What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production. In Victor D. Lippit, editors, Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis. Armok NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994 [1974].Google Scholar
  37. Jacques-Alain Miller. Jeremy Bentham' Panoptic Device. October, 41 ( Summer): 3–29, 1987 [1973].Google Scholar
  38. Stephen Paul Miller. The Seventies Now: Culture as Surveillance. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. Vance Packard. The Naked Society. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1964.Google Scholar
  40. Mary Poovey. The History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  41. Roy Porter. Enlightenment: Britain and the Making of the Modern World. London: Allen Lane, 2000.Google Scholar
  42. Tom Rockmore. Heidegger on Technology and Democracy. In Andrew Feenberg and Alastair Hannay, editors, The Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. James Rule. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. London: Allen & Lane, 1973.Google Scholar
  44. Graham Sewell. Be Seeing You: A Rejoinder to Webster and Robins and to Jenkins. Sociology, 30: 785–797, 1996.Google Scholar
  45. Graham Sewell. Plenary Address. International Workshop on Lean Production, Rende, Italy, March, 2000.Google Scholar
  46. Alan Sheridan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. London: Tavistock Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  47. Ferdinand Shoeman. Privacy: Philosophical Dimensions of the Literature. In Ferdinand Shoeman, editor, Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  48. William G. Staples. The Culture of Surveillance: Discipline and social control in the United States. New York: St. Martin' Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  49. Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. The Right to Privacy [the Implicit Made Explicit. In Ferdinand Shoeman, editors, Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Reginald Whitaker. The End of Privacy? How Total Surveillance is Becoming a Reality. New York: New Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  51. Steve Woolgar. Science and Technology Studies and the Renewal of Social Theory. In Stephen P. Turner, editor, Social Theory and Sociology: The Classics and Beyond. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Sewell
    • 1
  • James R. Barker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUnited States Air Force AcademyUSAF AcademyUSA

Personalised recommendations