Advertisement

Quality and Quantity

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Musical Notation of Non-Musical Courses

  • Eva Johanson
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Good graphic representations are a great help to directly see patterns in research results.Courses are no exception. However, a course means that time has to be a component in the representation. If the components are few, it is easy to draw conventional graphic representations over a time axis.However, if there are more than, say, 12–15 components under study the result becomes unreadable. If, instead, we use musical notation we can notate hundreds of components with the time given according to the time scale that suits the data. Readability is kept. The method is developed for two special cases; courses, where the duration of components is known, and courses where the order of components is known but not their duration. Information is shown on one or several staves as something resembling a musical score. As a by-product a modified musical notation is shown to be useful also for complicated cross-sections. These are working methods facilitating final analysis in making directly readable what should otherwise be exceeding the range of vision.

components courses graphic representation time musical notation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ellegå rd, K. (1983). Människa, produktion. Tidsbllder av ett produktionssystem. Medd. fr. Göteborgs universitets geografiska institution, Ser B, 72 Göteborg.Google Scholar
  2. Hägerstrand, T. (1982). Diorama, path and project. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 73: 323-337.Google Scholar
  3. Johanson, E. (1958). A study of schizophrenia in the male. Acta psychiatrica et neurologica scandinavica 33(125): 119-120.Google Scholar
  4. Johanson, E. (1981). Recidivistic criminals and their families: morbidity, mortality and abuse of alcohol. Scandinavian Journal of social medicine, Suppl. 27, pp. 22-26.Google Scholar
  5. Johanson, E. (1987). Registration of longitudinal data by means of musical notation. Quality, multidimensionality, time: description of a method. Quality & Quantity 21: 59-69.Google Scholar
  6. Johanson, E. (1991). High precision registration of complicated longitudinal and cross-sectional data. Quality & Quantity 25: 321-326.Google Scholar
  7. Johanson, E. (1997). Registration of longitudinal data by means of musical notation: some applications. Quality & Quantity 31: 207-215.Google Scholar
  8. Kihlgren, M., Hallgren, A., Norberg, A., & Karlsson, I. (1994). Integrity promoting care of demented patients. Patterns of interaction during morning care. The international journal of ageing and human development 39: 303-312.Google Scholar
  9. Rennie, T. A. C. (1939). Follow-up study of 500 patients with schizophrenia, admitted to hospital from 1913 to 1923. Archives of neurology and psychiatry 42: 877-891.Google Scholar
  10. Sällström, P. (1991). Tecken att tänka med. Stockholm, Carlssons, pp. 82-88.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, C. P., Franz, C. E. (1992). Appendix 1: Practice materials for learning the scoring systems. In: Smith, C. P. (ed.), Motivation and personality. Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (S.O. U.): 72 (1987) Juristkommissionens rapport. Part 2, App. 3. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  13. Stokes, H., Farrand, Ph., Brunelle, G., Roerden, D., Herzog, T. & Pugue, D. (1987, 1989). Finale. Version 2,5. CODA Music Software.Google Scholar
  14. Turner, B. (1965). Musical notation. In: Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 15, pp. 1085-1087.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Johanson
    • 1
  1. 1.SmedstorpSweden

Personalised recommendations