Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 12, Issue 9, pp 773–784 | Cite as

Pooled exposure–response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts of silica-exposed workers: an IARC multicentre study

  • Kyle Steenland
  • Andrea Mannetje
  • Paolo Boffetta
  • Leslie Stayner
  • Michael Attfield
  • Jingqiong Chen
  • Mustafa Dosemeci
  • Nicholas DeKlerk
  • Eva Hnizdo
  • Riitta Koskela
  • Harvey Checkoway
Article

Abstract

Objectives: Silica is one of the most common occupational exposures worldwide. In 1997 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified inhaled crystalline silica as a human carcinogen (group 1), but acknowledged limitations in the epidemiologic data, including inconsistencies across studies and the lack of extensive exposure–response data. We have conducted a pooled exposure–response analysis of 10 silica-exposed cohorts to investigate lung cancer.

Methods: The pooled cohort included 65,980 workers (44,160 miners, 21,820 nominees), and 1072 lung cancer deaths (663 miners, 409 nonminers). Follow-up has been extended for five of these cohorts beyond published data. Quantitative exposure estimates by job and calendar time were adopted, modified, or developed to permit common analyses by respirable silica (mg/m3) across cohorts.

Results: The log of cumulative exposure, with a 15-year lag, was a strong predictor of lung cancer (p = 0.0001), with consistency across studies (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.34). Results for the log of cumulative exposure were consistent between underground mines and other facilities. Categorical analyses by quintile of cumulative exposure resulted in a monotonic trend with odds ratios of 1.0, 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6. Analyses using a spline curve also showed a monotonic increase in risk with increasing exposure. The estimated excess lifetime risk (through age 75) of lung cancer for a worker exposed from age 20 to 65 at 0.1 mg/m3 respirable crystalline silica (the permissible level in many countries) was 1.1–1.7%, above background risks of 3–6%.

Conclusions: Our results support the decision by the IARC to classify inhaled silica in occupational settings as a carcinogen, and suggest that the current exposure limits in many countries may be inadequate. These data represent the first quantitative exposure–response analysis and risk assessment for silica using data from multiple studies.

lung cancer multicentre study silica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1997) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 68: Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-Aramid Fibrils. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hessel P, Gamble J, Gee J, et al. (2000) Silica, silicosis, and lung cancer: a response to a recent working group report. J Occup Environ Med 42: 704–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friedenreich C (1993) Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 4: 295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gordon I, Boffetta P, Demers P (1998) A case study comparing a meta-analysis and a pooled analysis of studies of sinonasal cancer among wood workers. Epidemiology 9: 518–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meijers J, Swaen G, Slangen J (1996) Mortality and lung cancer in ceramic workers in the Netherlands. Am J Ind Med 30: 26–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reid P, Sluis-Cremer G (1996) Mortality of white South African gold miners. Occup Environ Med 49: 459–464.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherry N, Burgess G, Turner S, McDonald J (1998) Crystalline silica and risk of lung cancer in the potteries. Occup Environ Med 55: 779–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison J, Brower P, Attfield M, et al. (1997) Surface composition of respirable silica particles in a set of US anthracite and bituminous coal mine dusts. J Aerosol Sci 28: 689–696.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fubini B, Bolis V, Cavenago A, Volante M (1995) Physicochemical properties of crystalline silica dusts and their possible implication in various biological response. Scand J Work Environ Health 21(Suppl. 2): 9–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller B, Buchanan D, Hurley J, et al. (1997) The effects of exposure to diesel fumes, low-level radiation, respirable dust and quartz, on cancer mortality in coalminers. Institute of Occupational Medicine Report TM/97/04, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steenland K, Brown D (1995) Mortality study of gold miners exposed to silica and non-asbestiform amphibole mineral: an update with 14 more years of follow-up. Am J Ind Med 27: 217–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koskela R, Klockars M, Laurent H, Holopainen M (1994) Silica dust exposure and lung cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 20: 407–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen J, McLaughlin JK, Zhang J, et al. (1992) Mortality among dust-exposed Chinese mine and pottery workers. J Occup Med 34: 311–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steenland K, Sanderson W, Deddens J (2001) Lung cancer among industrial sand workers exposed to high levels of silica. Am J Epidemiol 153: 695–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Klerk N, Musk A (1998) Silica, compensated silicosis, and lung cancer in Western Australian gold miners. Occup Environ Med 55: 243–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costello J, Graham W (1988) Vermont granite workers' mortality study. Am J Indust Med 13: 483–497.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Checkoway H, Heyer N, Seixas N, et al. (1997) Exposure-response associations of silica with non-malignant respiratory disease and lung cancer mortality in the diatomaceous earth industry. Am J Epidemiol 145: 680–688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rice F, Park R, Stayner L, Smith R, Gilbert S, Checkoway H (2001) Crystalline silica exposure and lung cancer mortality in diatomaceous earth industry workers: a quantitative risk assessment. Occup Environ Med 58: 38–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seixas N, Heyer N, Welp E, Checkoway H (1997) Quantification of historical exposures in the diatomaceous earth industry. Ann Occup Hyg 41: 591–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hnizdo E, Sluis-Cremer G (1991) Silica exposure, silicosis, and lung cancer: a mortality study of South African gold miners. Br J Indust Med 48: 53–60.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hnizdo E, Murray J, Klempman S (1997) Lung cancer in relation to exposure to silica dust, silicosis, and uranium production in S. Africa gold miners. Thorax 52: 271–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roscoe R, Steenland K, Halperin W, Beaumont J, Waxweiler R (1989) Lung cancer mortality among nonsmoking uranium miners exposed to radon daughters. JAMA 262: 629–633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hornung R, Deddens K, Roscoe R (1998) Modifiers of lung cancer risk in uranium miners from the Colorado Plateau. Health Phys 74: 12–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steenland K, Brown D (1995) Silicosis among gold-miners: exposure-response analysis and risk assessment. Am J Public Health 85: 1372–1377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McDonald J, Gibbs G, Liddell W, McDonald A (1978) Mortality after long-term exposure to cummingtonite-gruncrite. Am Rev Respir Dis 118: 271–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McDonald A, McDonald J, Rando R, Hughes J, Weill H (2001) Cohort mortality study of North American industrial sand workers. I. Mortality from lung cancer, silicosis, and other causes. Ann Occup Hyg 45: 193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Banks D, Morring K, Boehlecke B (1981) Silicosis in the 1980s. J Am Indust Hyg Assoc 42: 77–79.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Banks D, Morring K, Boehlecke B, Rochelle A, Merchant J (1981) Silicosis in silica flour workers. Am Rev Respir Dis 124: 445–450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sanderson W, Steenland K, Deddens J (2000) Historical respirable quartz exposures of industrial sand workers: 1947–1996. Am J Indust Med 38: 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hewson G (1993) Estimates of silica exposure among metalliferous miners in Western Australia (1925–1993). Department of Minerals and Energy of Western Australia, Perth.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davis L, Wegman D, Monson R, Froines J (1983) Mortality experience of Vermont granite workers. Am J Indust Med 4: 704–723.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eisen A, Smith T, Wegman D, Louis T, Froines J (1984) Estimation of long term dust exposures in the Vermont granite sheds. J Am Indust Hyg Assoc 45: 89–94.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Theriault G, Burgess W, DiBerardinis L, Peters J (1974) Dust exposure in the Vermont granite sheds. Arch Environ Health 28: 12–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dosemcci M, Chen J, Hearl F, et al. (1993) Estimating historical silica exposure among mine and pottery workers in the People's Republic of China. Am J Indust Med 24: 55–66.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McLaughlin J, Chen J-Q, Dosemeci M, et al. (1992) A nested case-control study of lung cancer among silica exposed workers in China. Br J Indust Med 49: 167–171.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhuang Z, Hearl F, Chen W, et al. (2001) Estimating historical respirable crystalline silica exposure for Chinese pottery workers, iron/copper, tin, and tungsten miners. An Occup Hyg (in press).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koskela R (1995) Association of silica dust exposure with lung cancer and other disease. Dissertation, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Steenland K, Spaeth S, Cassinelli R, et al. (1998) NIOSH life table program for personal computers. Am J Indust Med 34: 517–518.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferlay J, Parkin D, Pisani P (1998) Globocan I: Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. Lyon: IARC Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    SAS (1991) SAS User's Guide: Statistics (Version 6.07). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steenland K, Deddens J (1997) Increased precision using counter-matching in nested case-control studies. Epidemiology 8: 238–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harrell FE, Lee KL, Pollock BG (1988) Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 80: 1198–1202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gail M (1975) Measuring the benefits of reduced exposure to environmental carcinogens. J Chron Dis 28: 135–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stayner L, Smith R, Thun M, Schnorr T, Lemen R (1992) A dose-response analysis and quantitative assessment of lung cancer risk and occupational cadmium exposure. Anns Epidemiol 2: 177–194.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hornung R, Meinhardt T (1987) Quantitative risk assessment of lung cancer in US uranium miners. Health Phys 52: 417–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Steenland K, Deddens J, Stayner L (1998) Diesel exhaust and lung cancer in the trucking industry exposure-response analysis and risk assessment. Am J Indust Med 34: 220–228.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hertz-Piccioto I, Smith A (1993) Observations on the dose-response curve for arsenic exposure and lung cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 19: 217–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Steenland K, Piacitelli L, Deddens J, Fingerhut M, Chang Lihlng (1999) Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): an update and exposure-response analysis of the NIOSH TCDD cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 779–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Siemiatycki J, Wacholder S, Dewar R, Cardis E, Greenwood C, Richardson L (1988) Degree of confounding bias related to smoking, ethnic group, and socioeconomic status in estimates of the association between occupation and cancer. J Occup Med 30: 617–625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Checkoway H, Franzblau A (2000) Is silicosis required for silica-associated lung cancer? Am J Indust Med 37: 252–259.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Flegal K, Keyl P, Nieto J (1991) Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. Am J Epidemiol 134: 1233–1244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Correa-Villasenor A, Steward W, Franco-Marian F, Seacat H (1995) Bias from nondifferential misclassification in case-control studies with three exposure levels. Epidemiology 6: 276–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Steenland K, Deddens J (2000) Biases in estimating the effect of cumulative exposure in linear and log-linear models when exposure is subject to Berkson-type errors. Scand J Work Environ Health 26: 37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Deddens J, Hornung R (1995) Quantitative examples of continuous exposure measurement errors that bias risk estimates away from the null. In: Smith C, Christiani D, Kelsey K, eds. Chemical Risk Assessment of Occupational Health. London: Auburn, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gibb H, Lees P, Pinsky P, Rooney B (2000) Lung cancer among workers in chromium chemical production. Am J Indust Med 38: 115–116.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Enterline P, Henderson V, Marsh G (1987) Exposure to arsenic and respiratory cancer. Am J Epidemiol 25: 929–938.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    ICNCM (International Committee on Nickel Carcinogenesis in Man) (1990) Report of the International Committee on Nickel Carcinogenesis in Man. Scand J Work Environ Health 16: 1–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyle Steenland
    • 1
  • Andrea Mannetje
    • 2
  • Paolo Boffetta
    • 2
  • Leslie Stayner
    • 1
  • Michael Attfield
    • 3
  • Jingqiong Chen
    • 4
  • Mustafa Dosemeci
    • 5
  • Nicholas DeKlerk
    • 6
  • Eva Hnizdo
    • 3
  • Riitta Koskela
    • 7
  • Harvey Checkoway
    • 8
  1. 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
  3. 3.National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthMorgantownUSA
  4. 4.Tongji Medical UniversityWuhanChina
  5. 5.National Cancer InstituteWashingtonUSA
  6. 6.Australia
  7. 7.Finnish Institute of Occupation HealthHelsinkiFinland
  8. 8.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations