Can People Predict Chaotic Sequences?
- 22 Downloads
Previous studies suggesting that people predict chaotic sequences better than chance have not discriminated between sensitivity to nonlinear determinism and facilitation using autocorrelation. Since prediction accuracy declines with increases in the look-ahead window in both cases, a decline in prediction accuracy does not imply chaos sensitivity. To overcome this problem, phase-randomized surrogate time series are used as a control. Such series have the same linear properties as the original chaotic sequence but contain no nonlinear determinism, i.e. chaos. In the experimental task, using a chaotic Hénon attractor, participants viewed the previous eight days temperatures and then predicted temperatures for the next four days, over 120 trials. The control group experienced a sample from a corresponding phase-randomized surrogate series. Both time series were linearly transformed to provide a realistic temperature range. A transformation of the correlation between observed and predicted values decreased over days for the chaotic time series, but remained constant and high for the surrogate series. The interaction between the days and series factors was statistically significant, suggesting that people are sensitive to chaos, even when the autocorrelation functions and power spectra of the control and experimental series are identical. Implications for the psychological assessment of individual differences in human prediction are discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Casdagli, M. (1992). Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic non-linear modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 54, 303–328.Google Scholar
- Ferriere, R., Cazelles, B., Cezilly, F., & Desportes, J.-P. (1996). Predictability and chaos in bird vigilant behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 52, 457–471.Google Scholar
- Heath, R. A. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics: Techniques and applications in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Heath, R. A., Kelly, A., & Longstaff, M. (2000). Detecting nonlinearity in psychological data: Techniques and Applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation & Computers, 32, 280–289.Google Scholar
- Hegger, R., Kantz, H., & Schreiber, T. (1999). Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. Chaos, 9, 413–435.Google Scholar
- Herbert, B. (1999). Decision making and chaotic sensitivity in humans. Unpublished Honours thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, D., & Glass, L. (1995). Understanding nonlinear dynamics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Khadra, L. M., Maayah, T. J., & Dickhaus, H. (1997). Detecting chaos in HRV signals in human cardiac transplant recipients. Computers and Biomedical Research, 30, 188–199.Google Scholar
- Mandelbrot, B. B. (1999). Multifractals and 1/f noise. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Metcalf, L. (2000). Chaos prediction ability and intelligence: An initial examination. Unpublished Masters degree thesis. School of Behavioural Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar
- Metzger, M. A. (1994). Have subjects been shown to generate chaotic numbers? Commentary on Neuringer and Voss. Psychological Science, 5, 111–114.Google Scholar
- Metzger, M. A. (1995). Multiprocess models applied to cognitive and behavioral dynamics. In Port, R.F., & van Gelder, T. (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. (pp. 491–526) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Metzger, M. A., & Theisz, M. F. (1994). Forecast: Program to obtain forecasts from subjects for successive values of chaotic time series. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 387–394.Google Scholar
- Neuringer, A., & Voss, C. (1993). Approximating chaotic behavior. Psychological Science, 4, 113–119.Google Scholar
- Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Ruxton, G. D., & Roberts, G. (1999). Are vigilance sequences a consequence of intrinsic chaos or external changes? Animal Behaviour, 57, 493–495.Google Scholar
- Smithson, M. (1997). Judgment under chaos. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 59–66.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd Ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Ward, L. M, & West, R. L. (1998). Modeling human chaotic behavior: Nonlinear forecasting analysis of logistic iteration. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 261–282.Google Scholar