Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 653–674 | Cite as

Primary Attachment to Parents and Peers during Adolescence: Differences by Attachment Style

  • Harry Freeman
  • B. Bradford Brown
Article

Abstract

This study examines the nature of adolescent attachment to parents and peers during adolescence. A projective measure was used to classify 99 11th and 12th grade students into secure, insecure dismissing, and insecure preoccupied attachment groups. Respondents identified their primary attachment figure by nomination and by rating the level of attachment support they received from mothers, fathers, best friends, and boy/girlfriends. On average, parents and peers were equally likely to be identified as primary attachment figures but individual preference was strongly tied to attachment style. Secure adolescents significantly favored mothers over best friends, boy/girlfriends, and fathers. Although secure adolescents with romantic partners rated mothers lower on attachment support, none of the adolescents from this group nominated a boy/girlfriend as their primary attachment figure. In contrast insecure adolescents indicated a strong preference for boy/girlfriends and best friends as their primary target for attachment and nearly a third of dismissing adolescents identified themselves as their primary attachment figure. Findings are discussed in terms of individual differences in attachment during adolescence.

Keywords

Individual Difference 12th Grade Primary Target Strong Preference Individual Preference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ainsworth, M. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant—mother relationship. Child Dev. 40: 969–1025.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. Am. Psychol. 44(4): 709–716.Google Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, K., and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 226–244.Google Scholar
  4. Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Dev. 53: 1447–1460.Google Scholar
  5. Berndt, T. J., and Perry, T. B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relations. Dev. Psychol. 22(5): 640–648.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bretherton, I. (1990). Open communication and internalworking models: Their role in the development of attachment relationships. In Thompson, R. A. (ed.), Socio-Emotional Development, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1988. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
  8. Buhrmester,D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Dev. 61: 1101–1111.Google Scholar
  9. Buhrmester, D. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In Bukowski, W., Newcomb, A., and Hartup, W. (eds.), The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 158–185.Google Scholar
  10. Buhrmester, D., and Furman,W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Dev. 58: 1101–1113. Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. R. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3—20.Google Scholar
  11. Colin, V. L. (1996). Human Attachment. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Crowell, J. A., Fraley, C. R., and Shaver, P. R. (1999). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. R. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 434–475.Google Scholar
  13. Elicker, J., Englund, M., and Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Predicting peer competence and peer relationships in childhood from early parent—child relationships. In Parke, R. D., and Ladd, G. W. (eds.), Family-Peer Relationships: Modes of Linkage. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilldale, NJ, pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
  14. Entwisle, D. R., and Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Dev. 64: 1521–1540.Google Scholar
  15. Furman, W., and Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Dev. Psychol. 21(6): 1016–1024.Google Scholar
  16. George, C., Kaplan, N., and Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview. University of California, Berkeley, Unpublisned manuscript.Google Scholar
  17. Hauser, R.M. (1994). Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Dev. 64: 1541–1545Google Scholar
  18. Hazan, C., Hutt, M., Sturgeon, J., and Bricker, T. (1991, April). The Process of Relinquishing Parents as Attachment Figures. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, F. T., and Youniss, J. (1982). Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence. Dev. Psychol. 18: 806–811.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, N. (1985). Procedures for Administration of the Hansburg Separation Anxiety Test for Younger Children Adapted From Klagsbrun and Bowlby. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Kobak, R. R., and Sceery,A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence:Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Dev. 59: 135–146.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, R., and Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Dev. 62: 284–300.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, R., Richards, M., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., and Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Dev. Psychol. 32: 744–754.Google Scholar
  24. Laursen, B. (1993). The perceived impact of conflict on adolescent relationships. Merrill-Palmer Q. 39(4): 535–550.Google Scholar
  25. Main, M. (1991). Meta cognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In Parkes, C. M., Hinde, J. S., and Marris, P. (eds.), Attachment Across the Life Cycle. Tavistock Institute, New York, pp. 128–159.Google Scholar
  26. Main, M., Kaplan, N., and Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: Amove to the level of representation. In Bretherton, I., and Waters, E. (eds.), Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research: Monographs of the Society for Social Research in Child Development (Vol. 50(1—2, Serial No. 209)). pp. 66–104.Google Scholar
  27. Marascuilo, L. A., and Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical Methods for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, C. A., and Austin, A. B. (1995, April). Relatedness and autonomy aspects of self concept in 8-to 12-year-old children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  29. Monck, E. (1991). Patterns of confiding relationships among adolescent girls. J. Child Psychiatry 32: 333–345.Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, H. J., and Shaver, P. R. (1999). Attachment processes and commitment to romantic relationships. In Adams, J. M., and Jones, W. H. (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability. Plenum, New York, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
  31. Resnick, G. (1989). Individual Differences in Adolescent Attachment and Its Relationship to Family Cohesion and Adaptability. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MI.Google Scholar
  32. Resnick, G., and Haynes, J. (1995, April). The Automated Separation Anxiety Test: Using Artificial Intelligence and Computer Multimedia to Enhance a Child Semi-Projective Measure. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  33. Rothbard, J. C., and Shaver, P. R. (1991). Continuity of attachment across the life span. In Sperling, M. B., and Berman,W. H. (eds.), Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 31–71.Google Scholar
  34. Savin-Williams, R., and Berndt, T. J. (1990). Friendship and peer relations. In Feldman, S., and Elliot, G. (eds.), At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 277–307.Google Scholar
  35. Shulman, S., Levy-Shiff, R., Kedem, P., and Alon, E. (1997). Intimate relationships among adolescent romantic partners and same-sex friends: Individual and systematic perspectives. In Shulman, S., and Collins, A. W. (eds.), New Directions in Child Development. Romantic Relationships in Adolescence: Developmental Perspectives (vol. 78). pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
  36. Simpson, J. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 971–980.Google Scholar
  37. Sroufe, L. A., and Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Dev. 48: 1184–1199.Google Scholar
  38. Steinberg, L. (1990, August). Adolescent Development: An Ecological Perspective. Invited address to Division 7 (Developmental Psychology) of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Weiss, R. S. (1991). The attachment bond in childhood and adulthood. In Parkes, C. M., Hinde, J. S., and Marris, P. (eds.), Attachment Across the Life Cycle. Tavistock Institute, New York. Wintre, M. G., and Crowley, J. (1993). The adolescent self concept: A functional determinant of consultant preference. J. Youth Adolesc. 22: 1—15.Google Scholar
  41. Wintre, M. G., Yaffe, M., and Crowely, J. (1995). Perception of parental reciprocity scale (POPRS): Development and validation with adolescents and young adults. Soc. Dev. 4: 129–148.Google Scholar
  42. Youniss, J., and Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent Relations With Mother, Father and Friends. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Freeman
    • 1
  • B. Bradford Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of South DakotaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations