Determination of Plasma Protein Adsorption on Magnetic Iron Oxides: Sample Preparation
- 262 Downloads
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the sample preparation on the plasma protein adsorption pattern of polysaccharide-stabilized iron oxide particles by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-D PAGE).
Methods. The iron oxide particles were incubated in vitro in human plasma for five minutes. Thereafter, four different methods for particle recovery, including adsorbed proteins from surplus plasma, were investigated: centrifugation, magnetic separation, gel filtration and membrane-based static microfiltration. Adsorbed proteins were desorbed from the particle surfaces by surfactants and analyzed by 2-D PAGE, as described elsewhere (1,2).
Results. All the techniques investigated were able to separate small-size iron oxides (approx. 110 nm) and adsorbed proteins from excess plasma. The gels obtained by the different separation procedures displayed almost identical adsorption patterns. Major proteins identified were: fibrinogen, IgG, albumin and an unclassified protein of about 70 kDa with a pI value of 6.5−7.5.
Conclusions. Centrifugation was regarded as the most suitable separation method due to its speed and ease of use. In contrast to gel filtration, any washing media can be used. The magnetic separation process is restricted to particles with high inducible magnetic saturation, in particular, to iron oxides with overall sizes > 50 nm.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. F. Hochstrasser, M. G. Harrington, A.-C. Hochstrasser, M. J. Miller and C. R. Merril. Anal. Biochem. 173:424–435 (1988).Google Scholar
- 2.T. Blunk. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kiel, 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.J. T. Ferrucci and D. D. Stark. Am. J. Roentgenol. 155:943–950 (1990).Google Scholar
- 4.R. C. Brasch. Radiology 183:1–11 (1992).Google Scholar
- 5.R. Weissleder and M. Papisov. Reviews of Magn. Reson. Med. 4:1–20 (1993).Google Scholar
- 6.B. Hamm, T. Staks, M. Taupitz, R. Maibauer, A. Speidel, A. Huppertz, T. Frenzel, R. Lawaczeck, K. Wolf, and L. Lange. JMRI 4:659–668 (1994).Google Scholar
- 7.P. Reimer, E. Rummeney, H. Daldrup, T. Balzer, B. Tombach, T. Berns and P. Peters. Radiology 195:489–496 (1995).Google Scholar
- 8.R. H. Müller. Colloidal Carriers for Controlled Drug Delivery and Targeting, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, 1991.Google Scholar
- 9.C. J. Van Oss. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 32:19–39 (1978).Google Scholar
- 10.R. Weissleder, J. F. Heautot, B. K. Schaffer, N. Nossiff, M. I. Papisov, A. Bogdanov, and T. J. Brady. Radiology 191:225–230 (1995).Google Scholar
- 11.Y. Anzai, K. E. Blackwell, S. L. Hirschowitz, J. W. Rogers, Y. Sato, W. T. C. Yuh, V. M. Runge, M. R. Morris, S. J. McLachlan, and R. B. Lufkin. Radiology 192:709–715 (1994).Google Scholar
- 12.M. Kresse. Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 1994.Google Scholar
- 13.D. Pfefferer. Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
- 14.J. E. Diederichs. Electrophoresis 17:607–611 (1996).Google Scholar
- 15.T. Blunk, D. F. Hochstrasser, J.-C. Sanchez, B. W. Müller, and R. H. Müller. Electrophoresis 14:1382–1387 (1993).Google Scholar
- 16.R. D. Appel, D. F. Hochstrasser, M. Funk, J. R. Vargas, C. Pellegrini, A. F. Muller, and J. R. Scherrer. Electrophoresis 12:722–735 (1991).Google Scholar
- 17.O. Golaz, G. J. Hughes, J. Frutiger, N. Paquet, A. Bairoch, C. Pasquali, J.-C. Sanchez, J.-T. Tissot, R. D. Appel, C. Walzer, L. Balant, and D. F. Hochstrasser. Electrophoresis 14:1223–1231 (1993).Google Scholar
- 18.N. L. Anderson and N. G. Anderson. Electrophoresis 12:883–906 (1991).Google Scholar