Argumentation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 457–470

The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions

  • M.A. van Rees
Article

Abstract

In this article, the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is demonstrated to provide a useful instrument for discovering causes of an unsatisfactory development of problem-solving discussions. First a sketch is given of the development of a problem-solving discussion which, in the opinion of the participants themselves, developed in an unsatisfactory fashion. Then it is argued that this development can be traced back to flaws in the execution of the stages of a critical discussion.

Critical discussion problem-solving discussion verbal interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bales, R. F.: 1950, Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions.A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Mouton de Gruyter, Dordrecht, Foris/Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies.A Pragma-dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, B. A.: 1970, 'Decision Emergence: Phases in Group Decision-Making', Speech Monographs 37, 53–66.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, B. A.: 1980, Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Frey, L. R.: 1996, 'Remembering and 'Re-membering': A History of Theory and Research on Communication and Group Decision Making', in R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole (eds.), Communication and Group Decision Making (2nd edition), Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 19–55.Google Scholar
  8. Gouran, D. S.: 1988, 'Group Decision Making: An Approach to Integrative Research', in C. H. Tardy (ed.), A Handbook for the Study of Human Communication, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 247–267.Google Scholar
  9. Gouran, D.S. et al.: 1978, 'Behavioral Correlates of Perceptions of Quality in Decision-Making Discussions', Communication Monographs 45, 51–63.Google Scholar
  10. Hirokawa, R. Y., L. Erbert and A. Hurst: 1996, 'Communication and Group Decision-Making Effectiveness', in R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole (eds.), Communication and Group Decision Making, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 269–301.Google Scholar
  11. Jefferson, G.: 1989, 'Notes on a Possible Metric Which Provides for a 'standard Maximum Silence' of Approximately One Second in Conversation', in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: an Interdisciplinary Perspective, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 166–196.Google Scholar
  12. Poole, M. S.: 1981, 'Decision Development in Small Groups I: A Comparison of Two Models', Communication Monographs 48, 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Poole, M. S.: 1983, 'Decision Development in Small Groups III: A Multiple Sequence Theory of Decision Development', Communication Monographs 50, 321–341.Google Scholar
  14. Poole, M. S. and J. Roth: 1989, 'Decision Development in Small Groups IV: A Typology of Group Decision Paths', Human Communication Research 15, 323–356.Google Scholar
  15. Rees, M. A. van: 1991, 'Problem Solving and Critical Discussion', in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Argumentation Illuminated, Sicsat, Amsterdam, pp. 281–292.Google Scholar
  16. Rees, M. A. van: 1995, 'Analyzing and Evaluating Problem-Solving Discussions', Argumentation 9, 343–362.Google Scholar
  17. Rees, M. A. van: 1996, 'Accounting for Transformations in the Dialectical Reconstruction of Argumentative Discourse', in J. van Benthem, F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst and F. Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation, KNAW Verhandelingen, Nieuwe Reeks, 170, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
  18. Senge, P. M.: 1990, The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.A. van Rees
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiteit van AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations